The Bush administration on Wednesday asked a federal judge to order
Google to turn over a broad range of material from its closely guarded
databases.
The move is part of a government effort to revive an Internet child
protection law struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court. The
law was meant to punish online pornography sites that make their
content accessible to minors. The government contends it needs the
Google data to determine how often pornography shows up in online
searches.
In court papers filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Justice
Department lawyers revealed that Google has refused to comply with a
subpoena issued last year for the records, which include a request for
1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from
any one-week period.
The Mountain View-based search and advertising giant opposes
releasing the information on a variety of grounds, saying it would
violate the privacy rights of its users and reveal company trade
secrets, according to court documents.
Nicole Wong, an associate general counsel for Google, said the company will fight the government's effort ``vigorously.''
``Google is not a party to this lawsuit, and the demand for the information is overreaching,'' Wong said.
The case worries privacy advocates, given the vast amount of information Google and other search engines know about their users.
``This is exactly the kind of case that privacy advocates have long
feared,'' said Ray Everett-Church, a South Bay privacy consultant.
``The idea that these massive databases are being thrown open to anyone
with a court document is the worst-case scenario. If they lose this
fight, consumers will think twice about letting Google deep into their
lives.''
Everett-Church, who has consulted with Internet companies facing
subpoenas, said Google could argue that releasing the information
causes undue harm to its users' privacy.
``The government can't even claim that it's for national security,''
Everett-Church said. ``They're just using it to get the search engines
to do their research for them in a way that compromises the civil
liberties of other people.''
3:16:43 PM PermaLink /
|