|
| |
|
|
Friday, December 8, 2006 |
The number of journalists jailed worldwide for their work rose for the second year with Internet bloggers and online reporters now one third of those incarcerated, a U.S.-based media watchdog said on Thursday. |
Online Media Representatives Face Jail. OSDNBoss writes "According to the US Watchdog Committee to Protect Journalists a total of 134 journalists were in jail on December 1, 49 of which were Internet journalists. China leads the way with the highest number in jail. I'm sure the censors have already blocked Slashdot and other news and opinion sites in the countries mentioned. It begs the question, however, as the blogosphere grows are online journalists and editors more or less protected than their print and TV counterparts?" From the article: "China is challenging the notion that the Internet is impossible to control or censor, and if it succeeds there will be far-ranging implications, not only for the medium but for press freedom all over the world." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online] |
When UBS PaineWebber hired Roger Duronio as a full-time IT systems administrator in 1999, it failed to do a background check on him. A background investigation most likely would've revealed that Duronio has a criminal record that includes charges of burglary and aggravated assault. |
Are Background Checks Necessary For IT Workers? 4foot10 writes "UBS PaineWebber learned a hard lesson after hiring an IT systems admin without conducting a background check. Now its ex-employee is slated to be sentenced for launching a 'logic bomb' in UBS' computer systems that crashed 2,000 of the company's servers and left 17,000 brokers unable to make trades." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online] |
RIAA Mischaracterizes Letter Received From AOL.
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In Elektra v. Schwartz, an RIAA case against a Queens woman with Multiple Sclerosis who indicates that she had never even heard of file sharing until the RIAA came knocking on her door, the judge held that Ms. Schwartz's summary judgment request for dismissal was premature
because the RIAA said it had a letter from AOL 'confirm[ing] that
defendant owned an internet access account through which copyrighted
sound recordings were downloaded and distributed.' When her lawyers got
a copy of the actual AOL letter they saw that it had no such statement in it, and asked the judge to reconsider." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online] |
HP Pays $14.5M to Make Civil Charges Disappear.
theodp writes "The California Attorney General's Office negotiated a $14.5 million payoff from HP
as part of a settlement that calls for the state not to pursue civil
charges related to the now infamous spy scandal against the company and
its current or former officers or directors (felony criminal charges
against five individuals still remain). HP also agreed to maintain the
watchdog positions of chief ethics officer and chief privacy officer for five years." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online] |
US outlines privacy safeguards - and reveals plans to mine personal data. |
Oppose Broadcast and Radio Flag Legislation in Lame Duck Session. |
DRM Fading for Music: The Year in Review. |
UK plans 'real-time' no-fly lists plus fingerprint ID for air travel. |
HP Settles Civil Lawsuit Over Spying. Agrees to pay $13.5 million to a state fund to enforce privacy laws. [PC World: Latest Technology News] |
Microsoft Readies Windows, Other Security Fixes. Company will release six security updates next week. [PC World: Latest Technology News] |
Information Security [^] Whose Responsibility is It? This paper, contributed by Guillermo Ortiz-Caceres, discusses the responsibility consumers have and how security can be achieved through education of best practices. By Guillermo Ortiz-Caceres. [Infosec Writers Latest Security Papers] |