Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Washington State Representative Introduces RFID Legislation - RFID Journal
  • FTC Staff Revises Online Behavioral Advertising Principles
  • Why I'm Switching to the Google Chrome Browser (New Privacy Enhancements)
  • Policing the Online Ad Market
  • Dear Attorney General Mukasey... ( CIA torture tapes )
  • Hacked E-Mails Fuel Global Warming Debate
  • MIT Coders' Free Speech At Stake

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Viacom Says "YouTube Depends On Us"

Submitted by MacRonin on March 26, 2007 - 4:02pm
  • Companies
  • Company Legal Issues
  • Copyright
  • DMCA
  • Entertainment
  • Michael Fricklas
  • Person Career
  • Rights
  • YouTube

Viacom Says "YouTube Depends On Us": "Anonycat writes 'Michael Fricklas, a lawyer for Viacom, has an opinion piece in the Washington Post laying out Viacom's side in their $1 billion lawsuit against YouTube. Fricklas asserts that the DMCA's 'safe harbor' provisions don't apply because YouTube is knowledgeable to infringement and furthermore derives financial benefit from it. He also argues that putting the onus of spotting infringement onto the content providers represents an undue burden on them. Fricklas caps the argument by stating, 'Google and YouTube wouldn't be here if not for investment in software and technologies spurred by patent and copyright laws.''

(Via Slashdot.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog

Recent blog posts

  • More choice for users: browser-based opt-out for Google Analytics on the way
  • An uphill battle for online privacy
  • Policing the Online Ad Market
  • Why I'm Switching to the Google Chrome Browser (New Privacy Enhancements)
  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.