Vista Security Claims Debunked
Vista Security Claims Debunked: An anonymous reader writes "Apparently Microsoft still hasn't learned that counting vendor acknowledged vulnerabilities isn't a good way to establish the security of an OS. As an analysis of Microsoft's claims on Full Disclosure shows, we see that the methodology used was badly flawed. A bug in Firefox (not to mention emacs), counts as a flaw for Linux, while IE bugs get ignored on Vista's chart. Then we see that vulnerabilities aren't vulnerabilities when they're security-challenged features such as Vista's Teredo. Also, there's far too little consideration given to severity, given that it stoops to counting even extra access restrictions on a file in OSX to have something to show. In short, the original Microsoft analysis was good PR and poor research."
(Read Original Article - Via Slashdot.)
Recent blog posts
- Sweden Probing Cisco, NASA Hacks
- Jurors: Stop Twittering
- NBC Removes Conan O'Brien From the Web
- EFF Asks Court to Suppress Evidence Illegally Gathered From Password-Protected Phone
- Google Superbowl Ad Explains The Need for Search Privacy
- EFF Fights for Cell Phone Users' Privacy in Thursday Hearing
- Identifying John Doe: It might be easier than you think
- ShmooCon: Inside FarmVille's sinister underbelly
- More Details on the Chinese Attack Against Google (Schneier)
- The top 5 mistakes of privacy awareness programs