Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • The Right to Privacy
  • Massive Takedown of Anti-Scientology Videos on YouTube
  • Zero Day Threats: Part 1 - What They Are, and What They're Not
  • Judge Says RIAA "Disingenuous," Decision Stands
  • Florida defendant goes after RIAA for fraud, conspiracy, and extortion
  • Data export leaves firms vulnerable, says research
  • FBI's $500 Million Wiretap Retrofitting Fund Empty

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Privacy issues allow blogger to contest

Submitted by MacRonin on July 26, 2007 - 5:18pm
  • Companies
  • Decisions
  • First Amendment
  • HIPAA
  • Hmmm
  • ID
  • ISP - Internet Service Providers
  • Person Career
  • Privacy


Privacy issues allow blogger to contest - The Paris News
: "Essent, parent company of Paris Regional Medical Center, and SuddenLink, an internet service provider, have reached an agreement in the lawsuit brought by PRMC against unknown bloggers.

SuddenLink had been ordered to release the name of the owner of the blog site by 62nd District Court Judge Scott McDowell, after PRMC accused the blogger of defaming the hospital and breaking the law in releasing patient confidential information.

McDowell gave Sudden-Link 20 days to release the name, but that deadline has passed, and the internet provider gave the court a further look at privacy laws.

Tuesday, a new order came down from the court addressing the privacy issue.

SuddenLink will be required to send notice requiring the addressee's signature acknowledging receipt within three calendar days from entry of the order and informing the subscriber SuddenLink has been ordered to disclose his or her name and address.

SuddenLink then is ordered to advise the court and PRMC of the date the subscriber was notified.

Should the subscriber file a responsive pleading or opposition to disclosure of his or her name, SuddenLink will not be required to disclose the requested information unless and until the court considers and disposes of that challenge.

The subscriber has 10 days from receipt of the notice to provide a signature or refuse to sign and challenge the disclosure.
"

(Read Original Article - Via The Paris Texas News .)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.