Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • ITU botnet paper published in draft form, comments requested
  • Mythbusters Gagged: Did Credit Card Companies Kill Episode Exposing RFID Security Flaws ?
  • The dismal legacy of Bush's top yes man
  • #BurningMan ticket policy = #FAIL / Know Before You Go: Tickets May Come at a Higher Price Than You Realize
  • When the RIAA loses its mind
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • U.K. student records to sit in accessible database

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Should the FCC Parent the Parents?

Submitted by MacRonin on September 7, 2007 - 8:34am
  • ACLU
  • Activists
  • Alert
  • Editorial
  • Entertainment
  • FCC - Federal Communication Commission
  • First Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Proposed Laws
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone

Should the FCC Parent the Parents?: "In June, a federal appeals court found the FCC's policies on punishing on-air expletives 'arbitrary and capricious,' spurring Senator Jay Rockefeller to introduce legislation that would deem any 'fleeting expletive'— like the one Bono spontaneously uttered at the 2003 Golden Globe awards — indecent. Rockefeller's also looking to give the FCC authority to regulate violence on TV as well.

Today, the Christian Science Monitor featured an op-ed from ACLU Legislative Director Caroline Fredrickson, who spoke out against FCC regulation of television programming:

'The ACLU is not blind to the issue at hand. We can see why some parents are upset about what they see on television. But the answer lies in teaching those parents how they can limit what their children watch — not censorship. Congress may choose to play a role in educating parents on the dangers of overexposure to media. But government focus should then be on providing those educational opportunities — not on replacing parents as the primary decisionmakers in their own homes. Government should not parent the parents.'

If you agree that parents, not the FCC, should have ultimate control over the programming their kids watch, please send an email to your senators and representatives telling them you oppose government control of television content.

"

(Read Original Article - Via ACLU Blog - Free Speech.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.