Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Privacy concerns on speed cameras
  • Google Introduces New Cell Phone Mapping Service
  • Analysis: Spy Ruling Portends Hurdles for AT&T Eavesdropping Case
  • Personal Data of Georgia Medicaid, PeachCare Recipients Lost - April 2007
  • All Your Data Belongs to Us - MIT Technology Review
  • Senate Approves Vital Health Privacy Bill
  • Federal Court Rules That D.C. Police Unlawfully Arrested Anti-Bush Protesters On Inauguration Day

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Federal judge faults Bush administration for excessive secrecy

Submitted by MacRonin on September 12, 2007 - 10:24am
  • Activists
  • Court (US)
  • Decisions
  • DOJ - Dept of Justice
  • EPIC
  • FOIA
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Privacy
  • Rights
  • Surveillance
  • White House

Federal judge faults Bush administration for excessive secrecy - firstamendmentcenter.org: news: WASHINGTON — A U.S. judge scolded the Bush administration yesterday for responding with sometimes blanket secrecy to a request for documents on its warrantless-wiretapping program.

Privacy groups and civil rights organizations sued the Justice Department last year, demanding it release documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The government refused to release most of the records, arguing that such a move could jeopardize national security and undermine terrorism investigations.

But U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. said that reasoning is not good enough.

"While the court is certainly sensitive to the government's need to protect classified information and its deliberative processes, essentially declaring 'because we say so' is an inadequate" defense, Kennedy wrote in EPIC v. Department of Justice.

Kennedy sided with the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the American Civil Liberties Union about some of the documents, saying those should be turned over to the groups. As to other records, Kennedy agreed with the Justice Department that they should not be turned over, either because they were classified or because they were drafts of documents not covered by public records laws.

(Read Original Article - Via firstamendmentcenter.org.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.