Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
  • FAQ
  • Wishlists
  • Contact
  • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

RSS Feed + Site Map

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

GPS Tracking
Search By Phone Number
Hosting
Home Security Systems Toronto
Mercedes-Benz Luxury Cars News
Disk Encryption
spy camera

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Wikileaks Publishes FBI VoIP Surveillance Docs
  • EFF - Minilinks for 2007-10-22
  • Senate Committee Sets Subpoena Vote for NSA Docs
  • Cablevision Scores Copyright Victory Against Hollywood
  • NBC-Vista copy-protection snafu reminds us why DRM stinks
  • Pentagon Seeks a New Generation of Hackers
  • U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Misses the Transparency Memo

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

Performancing Metrics Blog Statistics
EatonWeb Blog Directory
Listed on BlogShares
View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Verizon Reverses Course on Abortion Text-Messaging

Submitted by MacRonin on September 30, 2007 - 9:53pm.
  • ACLU
  • Alert
  • Editorial
  • First Amendment
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • News Follow-up Update/Correction
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • Studies
  • Telecommunications
  • Verizon

Verizon Reverses Course on Abortion Text-Messaging: "If you want to see what the Internet will look like in a few years without net neutrality, you need look no further than this week's stories about Verizon Wireless' attempts to censor messages on its text-message network. Today the telecommunications giant reversed a decision it made last week to reject NARAL Pro-Choice America's request to make a text-message advocacy campaign available on Verizon networks. The program would allow people to sign up for text messages with NARAL by sending a five digit 'short code.' These types of programs have become very popular with activist groups and political candidates.

Earlier, Verizon told NARAL it does not accept programs from any group ‘that seeks to promote an agenda or distribute content that, in its discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory to any of our users.’ Never mind that you have to sign up for the program so you don't get unsolicited messages. If Verizon says your program is controversial or unsavory, you can always go elsewhere.

The problem with that philosophy is that 'going elsewhere' is becoming less of an option. As companies gobble other companies to become giant behemoths, competition becomes scarce. The same kind of discrimination against content is happening in the Internet broadband world — in which Verizon is a major player — where there is even less competition, and where the threat of this kind of censorship has even broader implications.

Verizon and AT&T, among others, are spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress for the right to discriminate against content on the Internet it deems controversial, unsavory, or even just contrary to its own business interests. Net neutrality would protect your right to see and hear what you wish on the Internet without your service provider acting as a censor. According to the Verizon and AT&T lobbyists, net neutrality would stifle innovation. Translation: it would mean we couldn't force you to see only what we want you to see.

So now that Verizon's changed its mind and will allow NARAL's campaign to move forward, does this mean we don’t need to worry? No. Verizon changed its mind this time, but it can change it again at any time. Only a federal policy of nondiscrimination in content will guarantee this doesn’t happen again.

If the Internet is to truly be a powerful force for freedom of expression, we cannot allow big business OR government to choose the content. Today, it’s Verizon shutting out NARAL. Who will it be tomorrow?

"

(Read Original Article - Via ACLU Blog - Free Speech.)


Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • Technorati Technorati
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Apple patching serious SMS vulnerability on iPhone
  • Enter the Advertisers - self-regulatory principles ?
  • Out of business, Clear may sell customer data
  • TSA asked to ensure safety of customer data after Clear closing
  • Several Facts about Google and HTTPS
  • China thinks twice – and its 300m internet users scent a rare victory
  • Did the Sanford E-Mail Tipster or the Newspaper Break the Law?
  • Supreme Court Serves Up Remote-Recording Victory
  • Deep-Packet Inspection in U.S. Scrutinized Following Iran Surveillance
  • ATM Vendor Halts Researcher’s Talk on Vulnerability
more
Compilation © Copyright 1997-2009 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.