Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • More IT Pros Could Turn To E-Crime In Poor Economy
  • Congress Expected to Pass Health Privacy Protections
  • Beta Test MySpace's Kid-Tracking Software
  • Privacy report a major disappointment
  • New Facebook Privacy Policies Will Have A Significant Impact On Platform Applications
  • Inside Operation Highlander: the NSA's Wiretapping of Americans Abroad
  • ACLU Says Extracting DNA From Suspects Unconstitutional

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Spying and Congress -- chicagotribune.com

Submitted by MacRonin on October 19, 2007 - 2:27pm
  • Activists
  • Congress
  • Editorial
  • FISA - Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Laws
  • Privacy
  • Proposed Laws
  • Remember
  • Spin Zone
  • Surveillance
  • Telecommunications
  • White House

Spying and Congress -- chicagotribune.com: The Democrats in Congress did a smart thing in last summer's intense debate over limits on American eavesdropping on terror suspects overseas. The Democrats folded. They agreed to plug a huge gap in that foreign surveillance: They helped pass a bill that expanded the government's authority to eavesdrop -- without a warrant -- on international phone calls and other communications that pass through U.S. networks.

But the new law came with an expiration date of February 2008.

And almost as soon as the ink was dry, some Democrats suffered buyer's remorse. The bill was overly broad and lacked effective court oversight, some civil libertarians said. Critics said the Democrats had been rolled by the Republican White House, stampeded by fears that they would be blamed if there was a terrorist attack and they hadn't fixed the intelligence law.

Now Congress and the White House are sparring again. The House is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a bill that many Democrats say would fix the current law's excesses and assure Americans that their privacy rights aren't being trampled by overzealous federal wiretappers. Republicans have labeled the Democrats' new proposal deeply flawed.

So the fight is on. Sticking points include:

(Read Original Article - Via chicagotribune.com .)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
  • Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Unite
  • Case Report – BCCA says aerial surveillance by telphoto zoom lens not a search
  • Obama threatens to veto greater intelligence oversight
  • EFF Asks Illinois Appellate Court to Block Unmasking of Anonymous Online Critic
  • Who You Love Shouldn't Matter When You Serve
  • EFF Posts Documents Detailing Law Enforcement Collection of Data From Social Media Sites
  • Smackdown: Consumer Privacy vs. Advertiser Revenue
  • Secret Document Calls Wikileaks ‘Threat’ to U.S. Army
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.