Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

car insurance prices
Tracking System

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • University of Washington Tracking the Edge of Privacy
  • Ex AT&T Tech Says NSA Monitors All Web Traffic
  • Telemarketing poppycock elimination laws take effect today
  • We Can Have "Win-Win" on Security vs. Privacy, says UK Academy
  • Verizon Violates Net Neutrality with DNS Deviations
  • ASCII Art Steganography
  • PIN Crackers Nab Holy Grail of Bank Card Security

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining DMCA Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Facebook changes the norms for web purchasing and privacy

Submitted by MacRonin on November 25, 2007 - 11:06pm
  • Activists
  • Advertising
  • Alert
  • Anonymity
  • Companies
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • Editorial
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Reviews
  • Rights
  • Security
  • Surveillance
  • Tracking

Facebook changes the norms for web purchasing and privacy: There’s no global opt-out - no ability to tell Facebook, “Please stop posting my purchase behavior from any third-party sites to my feed.” You’ve got to opt out from each new partner you encounter, either by clicking on the window on the purchase site, or by turning off this “feature” for each partner on Facebook.

I had two reactions when I saw a demo of this feature on Tuesday. One was “Well, that looks like a good reason to get off Facebook.” And the other, hearkening back to my days as the creator of ad-driven user-created-content websites, was “Hot damn, someone finally did it.” Because, of course, this is the sort of information that ad targeting companies would kill for.

For me, the overwhelming feeling was one of uneasiness - in my head, at least, this isn’t how the web works. When you’re doing business with a website, your interactions have consequences only on that site, not on a completely unrelated website, right? Of course, that’s not true - it hasn’t been for a while. HTTP supports the ability to load items from multiple sites on the same webpage - you’re loading this page from ethanzuckerman.com, but the badge of flickr.com pictures in the sidebar is loading from flickr.com. It’s pretty common on content websites to accept ad banners loaded from a third party, and cookies set in your browser that can be used to track your browsing behavior between different sites. (Here’s a useful tool that allows you to detect ad-tracking cookies installed on your browser and opt out of those networks.)

So why is this alliance between Overstock and Facebook any different? Well, technically, it does something that’s unfamiliar and uncomfortable for people who’ve written web programs that use cookies. A cookie is supposed to be a secret string of information written by one website to your browser and accessible only to that website. You shouldn’t be able to write a script that asks for information in a cookie set by another server. (There’s a form of cross-site scripting attack called “cookie theft” designed to do exactly this.) It looks like Overstock is somehow accessing your profile information on Facebook, which it shouldn’t be able to do.

Of course, what’s actually happening is that when you load Overstock’s “transaction complete” page, you’re also loading something from Facebook, likely an invisible image, and a script, which allows Facebook to access your Facebook.com cookie, which containts account information. Because Facebook and Overstock are cooperating in building a joint webpage, they can do something that seems… unheimlich… to those of us who’ve been playing on the web for the last dozen years.

(Read Original Article - Via Ethan Zuckerman's musings.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • The Secrecy Double-Standard
  • Fully-qualified Nonsense in the SSL Observatory
  • Appeals Court Strengthens Warrantless Searches at Border
  • Justice Dept. to Congress: Don’t Saddle 4th Amendment on Us
  • Feds, RIAA Ask $22,500 in Damages Per Song
  • Building a better Certificate Authority (CA) infrastructure
  • Where’s EFF? Why EFF Is Sometimes Quiet About Important Cases
  • Congressman Wants YouTube Video Covered Up
  • Man Creates "Creepy" Stalking App
  • Boston College Says Using WiFi Is a Sign of Infringement
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.