Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • EFF: Aug 3: Danny O'Brien speaks at Defcon about "Digital Rights Worldwide: Or How to Build a Global Hacker Conspiracy"
  • Tracking of Web Use by Marketers Gains Favor
  • When the RIAA loses its mind
  • Diebold Unloads Beleaguered Voting Machine Division
  • Tracing attack source key to cybersecurity strategy, Chertoff says
  • U.K. student records to sit in accessible database
  • Pentagon Wants Kill Switch for Planes

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Government Drops Pursuit of Online Used-Book Buyers

Submitted by MacRonin on November 30, 2007 - 11:28pm
  • Activists
  • Anonymity
  • Databases
  • Decisions
  • DOJ - Dept of Justice
  • First Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • ID
  • Law Enforcement
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights

Government Drops Pursuit of Online Used-Book Buyers - Via washingtonpost.com - Technology:

Federal prosecutors have withdrawn a subpoena seeking the identities of some people who bought used books through Amazon.com, newly unsealed court records show.

The withdrawal came after a judge ruled that the customers have a First Amendment right to keep their reading habits from the government.

The subpoena's "chilling effect on expressive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America," U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker wrote in a June ruling.

"Well-founded or not, rumors of an Orwellian federal criminal investigation into the reading habits of Amazon's customers could frighten countless potential customers into canceling planned online book purchases," the judge wrote in a ruling he unsealed last week.

Amazon, based in Seattle, said in court documents that it hopes Crocker's decision will make it more difficult for prosecutors to obtain records involving book purchases. Assistant U.S. Attorney John Vaudreuil said yesterday that he doubted that the ruling would hamper legitimate investigations.

Crocker, who unsealed documents against prosecutors' wishes, said he believed prosecutors were seeking the information for a legitimate purpose. But he said First Amendment concerns were justified and outweighed the subpoena's law enforcement purpose.

"The subpoena is troubling because it permits the government to peek into the reading habits of specific individuals without their knowledge or permission," Crocker wrote. "It is an unsettling and un-American scenario to envision federal agents nosing through the reading lists of law-abiding citizens while hunting for evidence against somebody else."

Federal prosecutors issued the subpoena last year as part of a grand jury investigation into a former official in Madison, Wis., who was a prolific seller of used books on Amazon.com. They were looking for buyers who could be witnesses in the case.

The official, Robert D'Angelo, was indicted last month on fraud, money-laundering and tax-evasion charges. Prosecutors said he ran a used-book business out of his city office and did not report the income. He has pleaded not guilty.

D'Angelo sold books through the Amazon Marketplace feature, and Amazon took a commission from the sales.

"We didn't care about the content of what anybody read. We just wanted to know what these business transactions were," Vaudreuil said yesterday. "These were simply business records we were seeking to prove the case of fraud and tax crimes against Mr. D'Angelo."

The initial subpoena sought records of 24,000 transactions dating to 1999. The company turned over many records but refused to identify the book buyers, citing a First Amendment right to keep their reading choices private.

(Read Original Article - Via washingtonpost.com - Technology.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.