Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Redbox, Movie Studios, and Subversion of First Sale
  • Groups: Record Data Breaches in 2007
  • U.S. Diverts Spy Drone from Afghanistan to Haiti
  • Stanford Law Professor Larry Lessig Explores A Bid for Congress
  • Web networkers 'at risk of fraud'
  • Eyes on the Prize as the Patriot Debates Unfold
  • Schneier on Security: Conversation with Kip Hawley, TSA Administrator (Part 3)

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Scotland Yard Investigator Wants to Collect DNA from School Children

Submitted by MacRonin on March 20, 2008 - 3:51am
  • Academia
  • Alert
  • Databases
  • Editorial
  • Europe
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Law Enforcement
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Security
  • Spin Zone
  • Tracking

Scotland Yard Investigator Wants to Collect DNA from School Children - Via Threat Level:

The director of Scotland Yard's forensics division says that Britain should be collecting DNA samples from any primary school children who show signs of behavior that exhibit a propensity for later crimes, according to an article in the Observer.

The Yard's Gary Pugh says the idea that trivial offenses committed early in life can forecast more serious crimes later in life is supported by studies, and that identifying these individuals when they're children would not only aid crime-solving later, but possibly deter some of these suspects from committing crimes when they're adults.

'If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large,' said Pugh. 'You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find who are possibly going to be the biggest threat to society.'

Pugh admitted that the deeply controversial suggestion raised issues of parental consent, potential stigmatisation and the role of teachers in identifying future offenders, but said society needed an open, mature discussion on how best to tackle crime before it took place.

The director of Liberty, a civil liberties group in the UK, swatted Pugh for his suggestion. "Whichever bright spark at Acpo thought this one up should go back to the business of policing or the pastime of science fiction novels," she told the Observer.

The U.K. has the largest DNA database of any country, with samples from 5.2 percent of the country's population, according to Britain's Home Office. The Observer parses that figure to 4.5 million genetic samples.

Currently, the country collects samples only from crime scenes and from anyone over the age of 10 who is arrested for a recordable offense and detained in police custody, whether or not they are ever charged for the offense. It's estimated that a year from now the DNA database will hold about 1.5 million genetic samples taken from youths between the ages of 10 and 18.

Last year a UK judge said he believed the country should be taking DNA samples from the entire UK population and every visitor who enters its borders because otherwise a disproportionate number of people currently in the database are ethnic minorities, creating defacto racial profiling. He also said that taking samples only from people already arrested for crimes means that authorities miss the chance to solve other crimes committed by people who have never been arrested and have no DNA sample in the database.

(Read Original Article - Via Threat Level.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
  • Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Unite
  • Case Report – BCCA says aerial surveillance by telphoto zoom lens not a search
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.