Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
  • FAQ
  • Wishlists
  • Contact
  • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

RSS Feed + Site Map

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

GPS Tracking
Search By Phone Number
Hosting
Home Security Systems Toronto
Mercedes-Benz Luxury Cars News
Disk Encryption
spy camera

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Joining Princeton's InfoTech Policy Center
  • All in a Day's Work ( unlawful detention, interrogation and torture )
  • iPhone Forensics: Recovering Evidence, Personal Data, and Corporate Assets
  • Exclusive: Widespread cell phone location snooping by NSA?
  • RIAA Trying To Avoid a Jury Trial
  • Immigration Bill Expands National ID Nightmare
  • U.S. Funded Health Search Engine Blocks 'Abortion'

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

Performancing Metrics Blog Statistics
EatonWeb Blog Directory
Listed on BlogShares
View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Viacom's Statement on YouTube User Data Controversy

Submitted by MacRonin on July 5, 2008 - 6:12pm.
  • Activists
  • Alert
  • Anonymity
  • Copyright
  • Court (US)
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • Decisions
  • DMCA
  • Editorial
  • EFF
  • Entertainment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Google
  • Hmmm
  • ID
  • Infrastructure
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Security
  • Spin Zone
  • Tracking

Viacom's Statement on YouTube User Data Controversy - Via EFF.org Updates:

Viacom released the following statement today in response to the YouTube user data controversy (first reported on this blog):

"It is unfortunate that we have been compelled to go to court to protect Viacom's rights and the rights of the artists who work with and depend on us. YouTube and Google have put us in this position by continuing to defend their illegal and irresponsible conduct and profiting from copyright infringement, when they could be implementing the safe and legal user generated content experience they promise.

The Court's recent decision has triggered concern about what information will be disclosed and how it will be used. Viacom has not asked for and will not be obtaining any personally identifiable information of any user. Any information that we or our outside advisors obtain -- which will not include personally identifiable information -- will be used exclusively for the purpose of proving our case against You Tube and Google, will be handled subject to a court protective order and in a highly confidential manner.

In addition, the New York Times reported that:

Google and Viacom said they had had discussions about ways to ensure the data is further protected to assure anonymity.

“We are disappointed the court granted Viacom’s overreaching demand for viewing history,” Catherine Lacavera, Google’s senior litigation counsel, said in a statement. “We are asking Viacom to respect users’ privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court’s order.”

Michael Fricklas, Viacom’s general counsel said: “We are investigating techniques, including anonymization, to enhance the security of information that will be produced.”

Mr. Fricklas added that Viacom would not have direct access to the information Google produces, and that its use would be strictly limited. Viacom would not, for example, be able to chase down users who illegally posted clips from “The Colbert Report” on YouTube.

“The information that is produced by Google is going to be limited to outside advisers who can use it solely for the purpose of enforcing our rights against YouTube and Google,” Mr. Fricklas said. “I can unequivocally state that we will not use any of this information to enforce rights against end users.”

It is encouraging to see that both Viacom and Google are responding to the important privacy interest raised by the court's order. We plan to continue discussions with the parties on ways to protect the privacy of the YouTube users and ensure that their rights under the Video Privacy Protection Act are given effect.

(Read Original Article - Via EFF.org Updates.)


Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • Technorati Technorati
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • A Remedy for Every Wrong? Why We Need a Consistent Privacy Act
  • Give Me My Health Data!
  • CDT, EFF and PK File Brief in Ringtones Case
  • Pirate Bay 2.0: Pay Pirates to Become Consumers
  • Judge Acquits Lori Drew in Cyberbullying Case, Overrules Jury
  • Apple patching serious SMS vulnerability on iPhone
  • Enter the Advertisers - self-regulatory principles ?
  • Out of business, Clear may sell customer data
  • TSA asked to ensure safety of customer data after Clear closing
  • Several Facts about Google and HTTPS
more
Compilation © Copyright 1997-2009 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.