Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Google Shareholders Reject Censorship Proposal
  • Ex-contractor sentenced for sabotaging Navy subs
  • Bill Would Tie Financial Aid To Anti-Piracy Plans
  • Comcast and BitTorrent
  • D.N.J.: Strip search must be on reasonable suspicion
  • The Illegal Spying Game, played over and over
  • AACS Key Revocation: The Future of DRM?

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

CRS Report of the Week - "Spam": An Overview of Issues Concerning Commercial E-Mail

Submitted by MacRonin on July 8, 2008 - 12:35pm
  • Activists
  • Advertising
  • CDT
  • Companies
  • Congress
  • Databases
  • Editorial
  • FTC - Federal Trade Commission
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Laws
  • Privacy
  • Reports
  • Rights
  • Scams
  • Spin Zone

CRS Report of the Week - “Spam”: An Overview of Issues Concerning Commercial E-Mail - Via CDT - PolicyBeta:

The report gives an overview of CAN-SPAM (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act), how it is implemented, related legislation, and legal actions based on the act. The report also looks at the FTC rules on CAN-SPAM compliance and related state anti-spam laws.

CRS No. RL31953, May 14, 2008

From the report’s summary:

Proponents of CAN-SPAM have argued that consumers are most irritated by
fraudulent email, and that the law should reduce the volume of such email because
of the civil and criminal penalties included therein. Opponents counter that
consumers object to unsolicited commercial email, and since the law legitimizes
commercial email (as long as it conforms with the law’s provisions), consumers
actually may receive more, not fewer, UCE messages. Thus, whether or not “spam”
is reduced depends in part on whether it is defined as only fraudulent commercial
email, or all unsolicited commercial email. Many observers caution that consumers
should not expect any law to solve the spam problem — that consumer education and technological advancements also are needed.

(Read Original Article - Via CDT - PolicyBeta.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
  • Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Unite
  • Case Report – BCCA says aerial surveillance by telphoto zoom lens not a search
  • Obama threatens to veto greater intelligence oversight
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.