Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
  • FAQ
  • Wishlists
  • Contact
  • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

RSS Feed + Site Map

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

GPS Tracking
Search By Phone Number
Hosting
Home Security Systems Toronto
Mercedes-Benz Luxury Cars News
Disk Encryption
spy camera

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • CDT, EFF and PK File Brief in Ringtones Case
  • Schneier Talk at the British Computer Society - information security trends and economic considerations
  • Web-based Anonymizer Discontinued
  • Court: Government Must Reveal Watch-List Status to Constantly Detained Americans
  • Internet Security Threat Report - Symantec Corp.
  • FCC Chairman Hints at Order Against Comcast
  • Academic Claims to Find Sensitive Medical Info Exposed on Peer-to-Peer(P2P) Networks

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

Performancing Metrics Blog Statistics
EatonWeb Blog Directory
Listed on BlogShares
View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Stop the Blocking, Feds to Tell Comcast

Submitted by MacRonin on July 13, 2008 - 9:33am.
  • Activists
  • Companies
  • Exploits
  • FCC - Federal Communication Commission
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • ISP - Internet Service Providers
  • Net Neutrality
  • News Follow-up Update/Correction
  • P2P
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone

Stop the Blocking, Feds to Tell Comcast - Via Threat Level:

A little less than a year after Comcast was caught faking internet traffic to limit its customers' peer-to-peer file sharing, government regulators are looking to censure the company for violating government open internet principles, according to Kevin Martin, the head of the Federal Communications Commission.

For its part, Comcast says its policies are already changing and that the FCC doesn't have the authority to tell it how to manage its broadband network, which has 14 million subscribers.

Martin, a Republican, intends to circulate an order to that effect among the other four commissioners Friday, in hopes that a majority of the commission will approve it  in the agency's August 1 meeting.  Martin will likely be joined by Democratic commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein,

The order would mark a significant victory for those who want the federal government to force Internet providers to keep their pipes and would set up a legal showdown with Comcast, which contends that the FCC's open internet principles are not enforceable since they never went through the proper regulatory channels. It would mark the first time that federal regulators dictated how large ISPs manage their networks, and comes at a time where ISPs are experimenting with ways to be more than a utility company. Those attempts have raised security issues and implicated wiretap law.

"Comcast's actions in this instance violated our principles," Martin told the Associated Press Thursday.

Martin's statement came months after the non-profit activist groups Public Knowledge and Free Press filed an official complaint, months of filings to the FCC  and two contentious public hearings, including one where Comcast crowded out activists with paid seat holders and another at Stanford where none of the large ISPs sent a representative.

Backers of so-called net neutrality, such as general counsel Marvin Ammori of Free Press, greeted the AP story with cautious optimism.

"This is an historic test for whether the law will protect the open Internet." Ammori said. "If the commission decisively rules against Comcast, it will be a remarkable victory for organized people over organized money."

Not surprisingly, Comcast denied that its attempts to control bandwidth usage violated anyone's rights and that the FCC has no current authority over ISP network management pratices, according to Comcast spokeswoman Sena Fitzmaurice.

Some technologists accuse Net Neutrality backers of pushing for rules that would hamper technological advances. Treating every packet the same would prevent ISPs from engaging in smart network management practices, such speeding up online phone call traffic to prevent jittery calls.

"The Commission has never before provided any guidance on what it means by 'reasonable network management,'" Fitzmaurice said. "Comcast does not block any Internet content, application, or service."

Although Comcast refuses to speak openly about how it throttles hungry peer-to-peer file services, independent tests show that Comcast networks send fake stop signals to file sharing programs that are uploading. Faking RST packets is a technique often used by repressive regimes to block citizens from viewing black-listed websites.

Comcast says that it only "delays" a small percentage of the massive amounts of peer-to-peer file sharing traffic on its network.

ISPs will fight to keep the order as narrowly tailored to Comcast's particular techniques, and  Comcast is likely to challenge any order in court, according to Art Brodsky, a spokesman for the Open Internet Coalition.

"If the FCC follows through, this is a good first step and sends a message to the industry," Brodsky said. "But obviously there will be legal challenges so the ultimate goal would be to have Congress step forward."

For its part, Comcast is asking the Commission to stick to its policy of not regulating the internet, arguing that its announced partnerships with companies like Vonage and BitTorrent, Inc. and Pando show that market forces are enough to ensure that pipe owners like Comcast don't dictate how the internet grows.

"We believe our actions, taken in good faith in response to consumers' concerns, further confirm the wisdom of the Commission's long-standing policy showing show (sic) regulatory restraint," the company wrote in a July 10 letter (.pdf) to the FCC.

See Also:

  • FCC Gets an Earful From Open-Net Defenders at Stanford
  • Commission Ready To Act in Net Neutrality Fight, Says FCC Chief
  • FCC Opens File-Sharing Probe (Charade) Into Comcast Traffic ...
  • Former Prosecutor: ISP Content Filtering Might be a 'Five Year Felony'

(Read Original Article - Via Threat Level.)


Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • Technorati Technorati
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • A Remedy for Every Wrong? Why We Need a Consistent Privacy Act
  • Give Me My Health Data!
  • CDT, EFF and PK File Brief in Ringtones Case
  • Pirate Bay 2.0: Pay Pirates to Become Consumers
  • Judge Acquits Lori Drew in Cyberbullying Case, Overrules Jury
  • Apple patching serious SMS vulnerability on iPhone
  • Enter the Advertisers - self-regulatory principles ?
  • Out of business, Clear may sell customer data
  • TSA asked to ensure safety of customer data after Clear closing
  • Several Facts about Google and HTTPS
more
Compilation © Copyright 1997-2009 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.