Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
  • FAQ
  • Wishlists
  • Contact
  • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

RSS Feed + Site Map

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

GPS Tracking
Search By Phone Number
Hosting
Home Security Systems Toronto
Mercedes-Benz Luxury Cars News
Disk Encryption
spy camera

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Do Breach Notification Laws Work?
  • Viacom DMCA driftnet: who's driving this thing?
  • FCC Opens File-Sharing Probe (Charade) Into Comcast Traffic-Management Practices
  • Amazon.com Add-On Hack Was a University Project
  • Credit Card Firm Cut Limits After Massage Parlor Visits, Feds Allege
  • CenturyTel joins Charter in data pimping freeze
  • NCTA: HBO's Zitter Says DRM Is Misnomer

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

Performancing Metrics Blog Statistics
EatonWeb Blog Directory
Listed on BlogShares
View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Mukasey Denies 'Dragnet' Surveillance While Demanding Telecom Spying Immunity

Submitted by MacRonin on September 20, 2008 - 7:39pm.
  • Anonymity
  • Companies
  • Congress
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • DOJ - Dept of Justice
  • EFF
  • FBI - Federal Bureau Of Investigation
  • FISA - Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • Laws
  • News Follow-up Update/Correction
  • Privacy
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • Surveillance
  • Telecommunications

Mukasey Denies 'Dragnet' Surveillance While Demanding Telecom Spying Immunity - Via Threat Level:

U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey on Saturday denied that the Bush administration -- in conjunction with the nation's telecommunication companies -- devised a "dragnet" electronic surveillance program that funneled Americans' communications to the National Security Agency without court warrants.

But the attorney general also insisted that telecom companies can not prove there was no dragnet without harming national security.

"Specific information demonstrating that the alleged dragnet has not occurred cannot be disclosed on the public record without causing exceptional harm to national security," Mukasey wrote in a federal court filing in San Francisco. "However, because there was no such alleged content-dragnet, no provider participated in that alleged activity."

It was the first time Mukasey, as the nation's top law enforcement official, or the government provided an emphatic and wholesale denial of allegations contained in lawsuits accusing the Bush administration of wholesale domestic spying in the years following the 2001 terror attacks.

Despite the denial, contained in a court filing (.pdf) made public Saturday, Mukasey asked a federal judge to grant immunity to the nation's telecommunications companies accused of assisting with the alleged surveillance dragnet. It is the first time the government has invoked the immunity legislation Congress approved July 9,  which was signed by President Bush the next day.

The lawsuit was brought in 2006 by the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation. The EFF's lawsuit includes documents from a former AT&T technician that the EFF claims describe a secret room in an AT&T building in San Francisco that is wired up to share raw internet traffic with the NSA.

The attorney general's statements were provided to U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker. Walker, of San Francisco, is overseeing three dozen lawsuits accusing U.S. telecommunication companies of taking part in the government's alleged "dragnet" surveillance program.

According to the immunity bill, Congress authorized Mukasey to inform Judge Walker via classified and non-public documents about why the government is seeking immunity on behalf of the communication companies. According to the legislation, Walker must automatically grant Mukasey's request.

Still, Mukasey's filing did acknowledge the Terrorist Surveillance Program. The so-called TSP authorized the NSA to intercept, without warrants, international communications to or from the United States that the government reasonably believed involved a member or agent of al-Qaeda, or affiliated terrorist organization. Bush acknowledged the program after the New York Times disclosed its existence in 2005.

Mukasey, as part of his court filing, sought immunity for the telecoms that participated in the TSP program. The TSP has now been legalized by Congress as part of the immunity legislation.

See Also:

  • Rights Group Suing AT&T for Spying Sues NSA and Cheney Too
  • ISPs Will All Spy on Their Customers, Professor Warns
  • Gonzales Violated Security Rules with Spy Docs, Lied to Cover it Up
  • Bush Signs Spy Bill, ACLU Sues
  • AT&T Whistleblower: Spy Bill Creates 'Infrastructure for a Police ...
  • Only Government Can Argue in Secret Spy Court, Feds Say
  • Justice Department Moving to Immunize Snooping Telcos
  • NSA Judge: 'I feel like I'm in Alice and Wonderland'
  • EFF Moving to Uncover Telco Immunity Lobbying
  • Analysis: Spy Ruling Portends Hurdles for AT&T Eavesdropping Case
  • Analysis: Spy Ruling Bodes Well for AT&T Eavesdropping Case
  • Lawyers Decry New Spy Law as Unconstitutional, Urge Federal Judge ...

(Read Original Article - Via Threat Level.)


Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • Technorati Technorati
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Apple patching serious SMS vulnerability on iPhone
  • Enter the Advertisers - self-regulatory principles ?
  • Out of business, Clear may sell customer data
  • TSA asked to ensure safety of customer data after Clear closing
  • Several Facts about Google and HTTPS
  • China thinks twice – and its 300m internet users scent a rare victory
  • Did the Sanford E-Mail Tipster or the Newspaper Break the Law?
  • Supreme Court Serves Up Remote-Recording Victory
  • Deep-Packet Inspection in U.S. Scrutinized Following Iran Surveillance
  • ATM Vendor Halts Researcher’s Talk on Vulnerability
more
Compilation © Copyright 1997-2009 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.