Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Kentucky Lawmaker Wants to Make Anonymous Internet Posting Illegal
  • Matthew Oppenheim tries to intervene in North Carolina probable cause hearing against MediaSentry
  • Privacy groups: Google's call for standard insufficient
  • FBI's Sought Approval for Custom Spyware( CIPAV ) in FISA Court
  • CFP08 - Videos up on the conference web site -- and more coverage
  • 500 Thousand MS Web Servers Hacked
  • CDT, EFF and PK File Brief in Ringtones Case

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Privacy Law and Online Advertising: Legal Analysis of Data Gathering By Online Advertisers Such As Double Click and NebuAd

Submitted by MacRonin on February 19, 2009 - 1:44am
  • Advertising
  • Anonymity
  • Companies
  • Congress
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • ISP - Internet Service Providers
  • Laws
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Reports
  • Rights
  • Surveillance

Privacy Law and Online Advertising: Legal Analysis of Data Gathering By Online Advertisers Such As Double Click and NebuAd: Via Open CRS: Recently Added

To produce revenue, websites have placed advertisements on their sites. Advertisers will pay a premium for greater assurance that the advertisement they are purchasing will be seen by users that are most likely to be interested in the product or service offered. As a result, technology has been developed which enables online advertisements to be targeted directly at individual users based on their web surfing activity. This practice is widely known as "behavioral" or "e-havioral" advertising. This individual behavioral targeting has raised a number of privacy concerns. For instance, questions have been asked whether personally identifiable information is being collected; how the information collected is being protected; and whether current laws are being violated if data are being collected without the consent of the parties involved. It is often unclear whether current laws, such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Communications Act, apply to online advertising providers that are collecting data through click tracking, capturing search terms, and other methods. However, it is likely that in many cases these laws could be held to apply to such activities and that these methods of data collection would be forbidden unless consent is obtained from one of the parties to the communication. This report will examine the application of these statutes to online behavioral advertising in more detail. There are no current federal regulations specific to online behavioral advertising. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put forth a number of guiding principles intended to aid the industry in creating self-regulatory principles. The FTC maintains that self-regulation is preferable to government intervention in this case. Organizations such as the Network Advertising Initiative have created policies which many online advertising providers have pledged to follow that represent industry best practices for protecting the privacy of web users. The 110th Congress has expressed interest in this issue. In July of 2008, both the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House Energy and Commerce Committee held hearings to examine the data collection practices of NebuAd, an online advertising provider that collects data on web users by using "deep packet inspection." Representatives Markey and Stearn sent a letter to 33 companies (such as AT&T, Comcast, and Google) on August 1, 2008, requesting additional information about their usage of "deep packet inspection" to collect data on users of their services. The Senate Commerce Committee held another hearing addressing broadband providers and consumer privacy on September 25, 2008.

Read Original Article ( Via Open CRS: Recently Added. )

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
  • Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Unite
  • Case Report – BCCA says aerial surveillance by telphoto zoom lens not a search
  • Obama threatens to veto greater intelligence oversight
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.