Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Law.Gov: America's Operating System, Open Source
  • Can I really comment on threads now?
  • Encryption Passphrase Protected by the 5th Ammendment
  • Judge deals blow to RIAA, says students can respond to John Doe lawsuit
  • Online Privacy Group Seeks Role in Mapping Out Policy / Group Wants Tighter Rules for Collecting, Using Consumer Data
  • NSA Dominance of Cybersecurity Would Lead to 'Grave Peril', Ex-Cyber Chief Tells Congress
  • Facebook Fixes Search Glitch, Explains Privacy Strategy

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Should the Govt Be Allowed toTrack You Via GPS?

Submitted by MacRonin on March 8, 2009 - 3:12pm
  • ACLU
  • Activists
  • Court (US)
  • Editorial
  • EFF
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • GPS
  • Hmmm
  • Law Enforcement
  • Privacy
  • Rights
  • Surveillance
  • Tracking

Should the Govt Be Allowed toTrack You Via GPS?: Via News and Analysis by PC Magazine.

Should the government be able to surreptitiously install GPS tracking devices on your vehicle without a warrant? The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation argued this week that such activity is a violation of civil liberties.

"This gives police unbridled discretion to collect location data on everyone, even if there are no reasonable grounds for suspicion," EFF civil liberties director Jennifer Granick said in a statement. "Investigators could track Americans on a whim -- 24 hours a day, seven days a week."

EFF and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a joint amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. on Tuesday arguing that the practice constitutes unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

The groups' filing focuses on the case of Antoine Jones, a Maryland man who was sentenced to life in prison last year on drugs charges after police seized 213 pounds of cocaine – reportedly one of the largest busts ever in the D.C. area.

During their investigation of Jones, however, police attached a GPS device to his vehicle without a warrant. The device tracked his whereabouts for a month, recording his vehicle movements and locations every 10 seconds, and amassing 3,106 pages of data.

"The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that a warrant is required when police use advanced technology to obtain detailed information about Americans' activities," the filing said. "Remote GPS tracking is such a technology."

Supreme Court cases in the early 1980's allowed the police to use radio "beepers" to keep tabs on vehicles they were following on public roads, but those cases specifically banned "dragnet-style law enforcement practices, or technological intrusion into private places," EFF said.

In the Jones case, EFF argued, police monitored Jones from afar.

"FBI agents did not actually follow Jones' vehicle as it made its way from place to place," the filing said. "Instead, they made use of advanced satellite and computer technology to remotely monitor Jones' movements across public and private areas."

The EFF and ACLU are concerned that such activity might set a dangerous precedent.

The fact that prices on GPS systems have dropped in recent years while their accuracy has improved "would allow law enforcement to create a massive database of Americans' movements without any judicial oversight whatsoever," EFF suggested.

Read Original Article (Via News and Analysis by PC Magazine.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.