Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Book: Contours of Privacy
  • Hotel guest lists may go public in Roseville California
  • RFID Anti-Skimming Laws Approved
  • Tracking People Using Bluetooth
  • Classmates.com’s Facebook Mimicking Prompts Privacy Suit
  • ISP makes movie “Privacy Matters”
  • Facebook Denies ‘All Wrongdoing’ in ‘Beacon’ Data Breach

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

iiNet faces the music in landmark case

Submitted by MacRonin on March 28, 2009 - 3:13pm
  • Australia
  • Companies
  • Copyright
  • Court
  • Entertainment
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • ISP - Internet Service Providers
  • P2P
  • Spin Zone

iiNet faces the music in landmark case: Via BizTech - Technology - smh.com.au .

iiNet is steadfastly refusing to admit that any of its users engaged in illegal downloading, despite forensic evidence presented by movie studios that apparently shows the date and time of thousands of individual copyright infringements.

In the Federal Court today, where iiNet is being sued in a landmark case by seven major movie studios and the Seven Network for allegedly permitting customers to download movies illegally, iiNet's lawyers said they would clarify their position on the issue by next Wednesday.

However, they foreshadowed possible arguments that infringements did not occur, by questioning whether transferring files over BitTorrent on a "one-to-one" basis was equivalent to making them "available to the public" under copyright law.

[...]

"They don't stop customers doing what they're doing and they keep asserting that they have insufficient information."

The studios claim iiNet in effect "authorised" customers' copyright infringement by failing to disconnect them when notified of the infringements by the movie studios.

Read Original Article (Via BizTech - Technology - smh.com.au .)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • EFF to Urge True Transparency in Congressional Hearing Thursday
  • Investigators: Businesses buying your credit card number
  • Global Internet Freedom and the U.S. Government
  • The dark side of DNA
  • EFF Experts to Speak at Privacy Roundtable in Washington, D.C.
  • Telling Friends Where You Are (or Not) - NYT
  • To Stop Crime, Share Your Genes - NYTimes.com ( Op-Ed Contributor )
  • FBI Hoaxes Boost Online Fraud
  • NetFlix Cancels Recommendation Contest After Privacy Lawsuit
  • Advertising - Instant Ads Set the Pace on the Web
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.