Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • EU Politicians Strikes Back Against Three Strikes
  • MySpace Gets False Positive In Sex Offender Search
  • Europe: Your I.P. Address Is Personal
  • Kaspersky's online police state - Security boss calls for end to net anonymity
  • New FTC statistics affirm World Privacy Forum's 2006 Medical Identity Theft report
  • FCC Will Get Passing Votes for Net Neutrality
  • Australian Government Ignoring Problems With Proposed Filters

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

EFF Challenges Government's 'Back Door Wiretap'

Submitted by MacRonin on June 11, 2009 - 1:21pm
  • Activists
  • Alert
  • Companies
  • Court (US)
  • Databases
  • DOJ - Dept of Justice
  • Editorial
  • EFF
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • ISP - Internet Service Providers
  • Law Enforcement
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • Surveillance

EFF Challenges Government's 'Back Door Wiretap': Via EFF.org Updates.

Cincinnati - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and other civil liberties groups filed an amicus brief in Warshak v. United States urging the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday to hold that the government's seizure of email without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment and federal privacy statutes, as well as the Justice Department's own surveillance manual.

During its criminal investigation, the Department of Justice illegally ordered defendant Stephen Warshak's email provider to prospectively "preserve" copies of his future emails, which the government later obtained using a subpoena and a non-probable cause court order. The government accomplished this "back door wiretap" by misusing the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is only supposed to be used for obtaining emails already in storage with a provider.

In Wednesday's filing, EFF argues that the government's seizure violated federal privacy laws and Warshak's Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in his email. As a result, the illegally seized emails should have been suppressed by the district court where Warshak was tried. All told, the government acquired over 27,000 emails spanning over six months from Warshak's email provider, all without probable cause.

"The Justice Department not only violated the Fourth Amendment and federal privacy statutes but its own surveillance manual when it conducted this 'back door wiretap' to intercept six months worth of emails without a warrant," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. "Thankfully, this abuse has given the appeals court yet another opportunity to clarify that the Fourth Amendment protects the privacy of email against secret government snooping, even when it's in the hands of an email provider."

EFF filed a similar amicus brief with the 6th Circuit in 2006 in a civil suit brought by Warshak against the government for its warrantless seizure of his emails. There, the 6th Circuit agreed with EFF that email users have a Fourth Amendment-protected expectation of privacy in the email they store with their email providers, though that decision was later vacated on procedural grounds.

"The government's illegal email surveillance in this case raises troubling questions about how often the Justice Department has bent the law or broken it outright in other criminal investigations," said Bankston. "This 'back door wiretap' is yet another demonstration of why Congress must update the federal surveillance statutes to require comprehensive reporting on how the government is using its spying authorities."

The amicus brief was also signed by the ACLU of Ohio and the Center for Democracy and Technology.

For the full amicus brief:
http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/Warshak_EFF_Amicus_Brief.pdf

Contact:

Kevin Bankston
Senior Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
bankston@eff.org

Read Original Article:(Via EFF.org Updates.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
  • Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Unite
  • Case Report – BCCA says aerial surveillance by telphoto zoom lens not a search
  • Obama threatens to veto greater intelligence oversight
  • EFF Asks Illinois Appellate Court to Block Unmasking of Anonymous Online Critic
  • Who You Love Shouldn't Matter When You Serve
  • EFF Posts Documents Detailing Law Enforcement Collection of Data From Social Media Sites
  • Smackdown: Consumer Privacy vs. Advertiser Revenue
  • Secret Document Calls Wikileaks ‘Threat’ to U.S. Army
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.