Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Mortgage telemarketing gets scrutiny
  • Administrivia: Is the donation code used in Cheerios Helping Hearts promotion re-usable? ( code - h24870p43h8037 )
  • BioShock Demo Installs SecuROM Service - GamingBOB.com
  • Optical nets easier to hack than copper
  • Rulings Leave Online Student Speech Rights Unresolved
  • E-Passports Signed, Sealed, Delivered -- But Not Like You May Think
  • Cryptol, Language of Cryptography, Now Available To the Public

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Thomas judge bars Fair Use defense, OKs MediaSentry evidence

Submitted by MacRonin on June 11, 2009 - 5:36pm
  • Companies
  • Copyright
  • Court (US)
  • Decisions
  • Entertainment
  • Hmmm
  • Legal
  • P2P
  • RIAA

Thomas judge bars Fair Use defense, OKs MediaSentry evidence: Via Law & Disorder Section - Ars Technica.

Jammie Thomas-Rasset's attempt to bar all MediaSentry evidence from her copyright infringement retrial next week has failed, as has her attempt to assert a "fair use" defense.

Judge Michael Davis oversaw the first Jammie Thomas trial and was sympathetic to her plight. After a jury awarded the music labels $222,000 in damages for Thomas' file-sharing, the judge made clear that he disapproved of the penalty:

While the Court does not discount Plaintiffs' claim that, cumulatively, illegal downloading has far-reaching effects on their businesses, the damages awarded in this case are wholly disproportionate to the damages suffered by Plaintiffs. Thomas allegedly infringed on the copyrights of 24 songs—the equivalent of approximately three CDs, costing less than $54, and yet the total damages awarded is $222,000—more than five hundred [emphasis his] times the cost of buying 24 separate CDs and more than four thousand times the cost of three CDs...

Read Original Article:(Via Law & Disorder Section - Ars Technica.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.