Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Why Hollywood Hates RealDVD
  • Officials Say U.S. Wiretaps Exceeded Law
  • Fortune 1000s host bots in the perimeter
  • Google's Data-Storage Fuels Privacy Fears
  • WiFi Safety Tips from Hacker Convention
  • FBI wants to move hunt for criminals into Internet backbone
  • Telling Friends Where You Are (or Not) - NYT

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Editorial - The Eavesdropping Continues - NYTimes.com

Submitted by MacRonin on June 18, 2009 - 9:03pm
  • Alert
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • Editorial
  • Exploits
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • NSA - National Security Agency
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • Surveillance
  • Tracking

Editorial - The Eavesdropping Continues - NYTimes.com: Via NYTimes.com .

Once again, the country is learning about how the federal government has been exceeding its legal authority and violating Americans’ most basic rights in the name of fighting terrorism.

In a disturbing article in The Times on Wednesday, James Risen and Eric Lichtblau said that Congressional investigations suggest that the National Security Agency continues to routinely collect Americans’ telephone calls and e-mail messages — perhaps by the millions.

These sweeps seem unconnected to specific terrorism investigations, and the communications are entirely domestic. The law does not allow fishing trips through Americans’ communications and only permits the government to read e-mails or listen to phone calls in which one party is “reasonably believed” to be outside the United States.

The government offered its usual response: Oops. A spokesman for the intelligence community said any “overcollection” was inadvertent and “when such errors are identified,” they are quickly corrected.

That excuse wore thin long ago. We heard it when the F.B.I. was caught abusing its power to issue “national security letters” to short-circuit constitutional protections. We heard it in April, when the Obama administration first acknowledged that the N.S.A. was exceeding even the expanded authority it was given last year to monitor international calls and e-mail traffic.

Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey, who leads the House panel that oversees intelligence agencies’ operations, was right when he said that “some actions are so flagrant that they can’t be accidental.”

The Times article reported that since 2005, intelligence analysts have used a database called Pinwale, which systematically archives both foreign and domestic e-mail messages by the millions — without regard for whether they are domestic or international or have anything to do with an actual investigation.

Mr. Holt is doing the right thing by pressing for an inquiry. But lawmakers should be clear about how this happened: last year, 293 members of the House and 69 senators voted for a dangerous and mostly unnecessary expansion of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which protected Americans from unwarranted government spying for 30 years.

President George W. Bush started violating that law shortly after 9/11 when he authorized the N.S.A. to conduct domestic wiretapping without first getting the required warrant. When that program was exposed by The Times in late 2004, the Bush team began pressuring Congress to give retroactive legal cover to the eavesdropping operation and to the telecommunications companies that participated in it.

Read Original Article:(Via NYTimes.com .)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.