Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Rootkit unearthed in network security software / Hidden process developer linked to Sony USB fiasco
  • Creationists Silence Critics with DMCA
  • Shocking new revelation: Unchecked government powers get abused
  • EFF Asks Court to Suppress Evidence Illegally Gathered From Password-Protected Phone
  • Dems Pull Through for Majority of Americans in FISA Vote
  • AT&T Whistle-Blower Hits D.C. To Stop Telecom Spying Immunity
  • Craigslist Win Good for Free Speech, But Court Creates Murky "Section 230" Precedent

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

U.S. Objects to China's Mandatory Green Dam Censorware

Submitted by MacRonin on June 25, 2009 - 3:31pm
  • Alert
  • Asia
  • Bot- Nets
  • Companies
  • Editorial
  • Exploits
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • Laws
  • Politics
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Security
  • Software
  • Surveillance

U.S. Objects to China's Mandatory Green Dam Censorware: Via Freedom to Tinker.

Yesterday, the U.S. Commerce Secretary and Trade Representative sent a letter to China's government, objecting to China's order, effective July 1, to require that all new PCs sold in China have preinstalled the Green Dam Youth Escort censorware program.

Here's today's New York Times:

Chinese officials have said that the filtering software, known as Green Dam-Youth Escort, is meant to block pornography and other “unhealthy information.”

In part, the American officials’ complaint framed this as a trade issue, objecting to the burden put on computer makers to install the software with little notice. But it also raised broader questions about whether the software would lead to more censorship of the Internet in China and restrict freedom of expression.

The Green Dam requirement puts U.S.-based PC companies, such as HP and Dell, in a tough spot: if they don't comply they won't be able to sell PCs in China; but if they do comply they will be censoring their customers' Internet use and exposing customers to serious security risks.

There are at least two interesting new angles here. The first is the U.S. claim that China's action violates free trade agreements. The U.S. has generally refrained from treating China's Internet censorship as a trade issue, even though U.S. companies have often found themselves censored at times when competing Chinese companies were not. This unequal treatment, coupled with the Chinese government's reported failure to define clearly which actions trigger censorship, looks like a trade barrier -- but the U.S. hasn't said much about it up to now.

The other interesting angle is the direct U.S. objection to censorship of political speech. For some time, the U.S. has tolerated China's government blocking certain political speech in the network, via the "Great Firewall". It's not clear exactly how this objection is framed -- the U.S. letter is not public -- but news reports imply that political censorship itself, or possibly the requirement that U.S. companies participate in it, is a kind of improper trade barrier.

We're heading toward an interesting showdown as the July 1 date approaches. Will U.S. companies ship machines with Green Dam? According to the New York Times, HP hasn't decided, and Dell is dodging the question. The companies don't want to lose access to the China market -- but if U.S. companies participate so directly in political censorship, they would be setting a very bad precedent.

Read Original Article (Via Freedom to Tinker.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
  • How Privacy Vanishes Online
  • Undercover Feds on Social Networking Sites Raise Questions
  • FBI Uses Fake Facebook Profiles To Spy On Suspects
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.