Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
GPS Tracking
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • JUSTICE: The Remedy for Government Surveillance
  • Obama's civil liberties speech
  • Computer Science Student Targeted for Criminal Investigation for Allegedly Sending Email
  • ACLU Says Extracting DNA From Suspects Unconstitutional
  • ShmooCon: P2P snoopers know what's in your wallet
  • Web firm sounds alert on criminal data trove
  • E-Passports Signed, Sealed, Delivered -- But Not Like You May Think

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Supreme Court Serves Up Remote-Recording Victory

Submitted by MacRonin on June 30, 2009 - 12:35pm
  • Companies
  • Copyright
  • Court (US)
  • Decisions
  • DMCA
  • Editorial
  • Entertainment
  • Hardware
  • Hmmm
  • Infrastructure
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • Supreme
  • Technology

Supreme Court Serves Up Remote-Recording Victory: Via Threat Level.

The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a copyright case testing whether cable operators may permit customers to store television programming on company servers to be viewed at a later time.

The issue concerns an August ruling by a federal appeals court, which lifted (.pdf) an injunction against Cablevision Systems blocking it from offering customers a recording service that stores programming on the cable company’s own servers instead of on viewers’ in-house playback devices.

Hollywood and television programmers maintained Cablevision’s service directly infringes their exclusive rights to both reproduce and publicly perform their copyrighted works. On appeal, they told the high court that the copyright case was the most important lawsuit following the justices’ 1984 ruling declaring American consumers had a fair use right to use videocassette machines to record copyrighted movies at home.

But don’t expect the court’s rejection of the case to be the final word. Renewed litigation over the topic is likely.

Ben Sheffner, the attorney behind the Copyrights & Campaigns blog who once worked on the case on behalf of Fox, has noted that there were several procedural problems making the lawsuit unworthy of the high court’s time.

The Obama administration, for example, wrote the justices that Cablevision and Hollywood’s agreement to take both indirect liability and fair use off the table “would prevent the court from seeing the whole fundamental controversy in this case, making it an unsuitable vehicle for clarifying the applicable legal framework,” Sheffner wrote.

The justices rejected the case without comment.

See Also:

  • Obama Urges Justices to Avoid Cablevision Copyright Case
  • Cablevision Scores Copyright Victory Against Hollywood
  • Comcast Deflects User’s Questions - Updated
  • Some ISPs Still Dodging Data Retention Requests, Help 27B Get the …
  • Obama: Stop Filling Administration with RIAA Insiders
  • Obama, Keep Filling Administration with RIAA Insiders

Read Original Article:(Via Threat Level.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • EFF Asks Court to Suppress Evidence Illegally Gathered From Password-Protected Phone
  • Google Superbowl Ad Explains The Need for Search Privacy
  • EFF Fights for Cell Phone Users' Privacy in Thursday Hearing
  • Identifying John Doe: It might be easier than you think
  • ShmooCon: Inside FarmVille's sinister underbelly
  • More Details on the Chinese Attack Against Google (Schneier)
  • The top 5 mistakes of privacy awareness programs
  • ShmooCon: P2P snoopers know what's in your wallet
  • Can you trust Chinese computer equipment?
  • Authors Guild: ‘To RIAA or Not to RIAA’
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.