Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • DNA Testing Firm Goes Bankrupt; Who Gets the Data?
  • Ameritrade Settling Hacking Lawsuit
  • Federal Court Denies Government Attempt to Delay Release of Telecom Records. Again.
  • Obama Issues Limits on ‘State Secrets Privilege’
  • The Slingbox Pro: Information Leakage and Variable Bitrate (VBR) Fingerprints
  • Microsoft Patents Frustration-Detection System
  • Congressmen: Pass ID Threatens Americans

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining DMCA Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Thoughts on Identity from the Gov 2.0 Summit

Submitted by MacRonin on September 15, 2009 - 1:08am
  • Activists
  • CDT
  • Databases
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • ID
  • Infrastructure
  • Person Career
  • Standards

Thoughts on Identity from the Gov 2.0 Summit: Via CDT - PolicyBeta.

Last week, the federal government announced a pilot project to develop digital identity solutions for federal websites, working with OpenID and Information Cards technologies. This will allow government agencies authenticate the public (for low and no security uses) and provide personalization and services. Online industry leaders have signed up as identity providers, and will allow citizens to use their existing identity online to interact with the government. Even six years ago, one third of online users logged in to government sites. The proliferation of online services and websites surely means that the identity program is something that agencies will be quick to take advantage of. Using a federated identity solution will allow agencies to stop developing and investing in independent solutions and instead use a plug-and-play system for identity. However, linking identities across the .gov web – let alone with the commercial web – carries new issues to be addressed.

There are 300 million Americans, any number of whom may want to do business with government at any time of the day or night. Often, this may just be looking up an address or printing forms, but many interactions will require some way to identify the citizen who is asking for services from the website.

Last week at the Gov 2.0 Summit, federal CIO Vivek Kundra noted that identity is crucial if government websites are to move beyond ‘brochureware” and provide services to and interact with the public. Making government websites more interactive and useful is a key component to the Open Government Initiative, and identity is a step towards that goal.

Identity, privacy, and security are related in any realm, but for government they pose a set of special problems. Government is not well equipped to deal with extra information about citizens, and is typically not allowed to track users. Using third parties and shared protocols to credential users is one solution to this problem, at least for relatively simple applications.

While this could be a move forward in terms of using identity online in government websites and services, there are still quite a few details left to work out before integrating digital identity into government websites. These pilots bring up many questions around privacy and implementation of the identity. A Trust Framework has been developed to assess identity providers against federal requirements. These federal requirements, most accessibly laid out in an OMB Memo in 2004, have been well explained in the materials at IDmanagement.gov, but we have more questions around the implementation and privacy protections as the government moves forward with these pilot programs.

Read Original Article:(Via CDT - PolicyBeta.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • The Secrecy Double-Standard
  • Fully-qualified Nonsense in the SSL Observatory
  • Appeals Court Strengthens Warrantless Searches at Border
  • Justice Dept. to Congress: Don’t Saddle 4th Amendment on Us
  • Feds, RIAA Ask $22,500 in Damages Per Song
  • Building a better Certificate Authority (CA) infrastructure
  • Where’s EFF? Why EFF Is Sometimes Quiet About Important Cases
  • Congressman Wants YouTube Video Covered Up
  • Man Creates "Creepy" Stalking App
  • Boston College Says Using WiFi Is a Sign of Infringement
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.