Ignoring RIAA lawsuits cheaper than going to trial
Ignoring RIAA lawsuits cheaper than going to trial: Via Law & Disorder Section - Ars Technica.
Jammie Thomas-Rasset and Joel Tenenbaum captured the nation's attention when they were defendants in the RIAA's first two trials against accused online infringers. But here's the mind-warping reality: both defendants would have been far better off monetarily if they had simply ignored the complaint altogether and failed to show up in court.
That counterintuitive logic played out again this week in Massachusetts, where federal judge Nancy Gertner issued four default judgments against accused P2P file-swappers who never bothered to respond to the charges against them. Their failure to appear meant an automatic loss, and though the judge does have some discretion in setting penalties, judges often pick the minimum awards in such cases.
Read Original Article:(Via Law & Disorder Section - Ars Technica.)
Recent blog posts
- In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
- Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
- EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
- Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
- Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
- Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
- Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
- Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
- Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
- Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry