Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
GPS Tracking
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Terrorist Watch List Hits One Million Names
  • Even the hackers are nervous
  • ISP Justifies, But Doesn't Explain Secret Customer Eavesdropping
  • Anti-P2P Company Gets Bit by the Torrent
  • Obama Dares Judge to Order Release Of NSA Spy Document
  • Sweden Probing Cisco, NASA Hacks
  • Thoughts on Identity from the Gov 2.0 Summit

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Software Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

UK Police to continue to hold DNA of innocent people | Politics | The Guardian

Submitted by MacRonin on November 13, 2009 - 1:05pm
  • Alert
  • Data Mining
  • Databases
  • DNA & Genetics
  • Europe
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • ID
  • Infrastructure
  • Law Enforcement
  • Laws
  • Person Career
  • Privacy
  • Quotation
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone
  • The Guardian
  • The Guardian
  • Tracking
  • Violations

Police to continue to hold DNA of innocent people: Via Politics | The Guardian .

Profiles to be kept for six years under revised bill

Terror suspects' details could be held indefinitely

Chief constables are to carry on refusing requests to delete the DNA profiles of arrested people released without charge, while a fresh political battle is waged over how long the details should remain on the database.

Home Office ministers confirmed they want to see the DNA profiles of innocent people kept on the national database for six years, after failing to persuade parliament to back a longer period of up to 12 years for the most serious offences.

But senior Labour backbenchers, alongside Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, made clear tonight that they did not believe the government climbdown on DNA went far enough.

It emerged that ministers are advocating a more draconian approach in the case of those arrested under terrorism legislation or national security provisions; their DNA profiles will in future be kept indefinitely.

Ministers are expected to introduce their revised package of measures on the DNA database as part of a policing and crime bill in next week's Queen's speech. In the case of those aged under 18, DNA profiles collected in connection with serious offences will also stay on the database for six years but will be kept for only three years in cases involving minor offences.

The plan to retain the DNA profiles of terrorist suspects indefinitely could draw in some protesters arrested under counter-terrorism legislation.

Ministers believe, however, that the number covered by the provision will only be in the hundreds. The proposal is more onerous than the original package, which proposed a 12-year limit for terrorism suspects who are freed without charge or later cleared.

The new DNA regime will apply in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and these time limits only apply to the innocent. Adults convicted of any offence remain on the database for life.

The shadow home secretary, Chris Grayling, said the Tories would continue to fight the DNA proposals and that they wanted to see the Scottish model adopted under which DNA profiles are kept for up to five years in serious violent and sexual cases only. The profiles are destroyed immediately after someone is released after being held for a minor offence.

Chris Huhne for the Liberal Democrats said the proposals were little better than the previous package. Keith Vaz, Labour chairman of the Commons home affairs select committee, warned they did not go far enough to protect the innocent.

Read Original Article:(Via Politics | The Guardian.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • Sweden Probing Cisco, NASA Hacks
  • Jurors: Stop Twittering
  • NBC Removes Conan O'Brien From the Web
  • EFF Asks Court to Suppress Evidence Illegally Gathered From Password-Protected Phone
  • Google Superbowl Ad Explains The Need for Search Privacy
  • EFF Fights for Cell Phone Users' Privacy in Thursday Hearing
  • Identifying John Doe: It might be easier than you think
  • ShmooCon: Inside FarmVille's sinister underbelly
  • More Details on the Chinese Attack Against Google (Schneier)
  • The top 5 mistakes of privacy awareness programs
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.