| |
|
Saturday, March 3, 2007
|
|
Blacklists appear to be the rage
these days. With the ease of storing and sharing personal information
-- coupled with lax privacy law restrictions on such activities --
companies can increasingly create blacklists of bad customers. In this article from the Ottawa Citizen,
hotels in Australia and Canada (and soon the United States) are signing
up for a service that compiles a blacklist against "bad" hotel guests:
11:55:39 PM
|
|
Under pressure from state investigators, Best Buy is now confirming my
reporting that its stores have a secret intranet site that has been
used to block some consumers from getting cheaper prices advertised on
BestBuy.com.
Company spokesman Justin Barber, who in early February denied the
existence of the internal website that could be accessed only by
employees, says his company is "cooperating fully" with the state
attorney general's investigation.
Barber insists that the company never intended to mislead customers.
State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal ordered the investigation
into Best Buy's practices on Feb. 9 after my column disclosed the
website and showed how employees at two Connecticut stores used it to
deny customers a $150 discount on a computer advertised on BestBuy.com.
Blumenthal said Wednesday that Best Buy has also confirmed to his
office the existence of the intranet site, but has so far failed to
give clear answers about its purpose and use.
"Their responses seem to raise as many questions as they answer,"
Blumenthal said in an interview. "Their answers are less than crystal
clear."
11:26:10 PM
|
|
The Bush administration has accelerated its Internet surveillance
push by proposing that Web sites must keep records of who uploads
photographs or videos in case police determine the content is illegal
and choose to investigate, CNET News.com has learned.
That proposal surfaced Wednesday in a private meeting during which U.S.
Department of Justice officials, including Assistant Attorney General
Rachel Brand, tried to convince industry representatives such as AOL
and Comcast that data retention
would be valuable in investigating terrorism, child pornography and
other crimes. The discussions were described to News.com by several
people who attended the meeting.
A second purpose of the meeting in Washington, D.C., according to the
sources, was to ask Internet service providers how much it would cost
to record details on their subscribers for two years. At the very
least, the companies would be required to keep logs for police of which
customer is assigned a specific Internet address.
Only universities and libraries would be excluded, one participant
said. "There's a PR concern with including the libraries, so we're not
going to include them," the participant quoted the Justice Department
as saying. "We know we're going to get a pushback, so we're not going
to do that."
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has been lobbying Congress for mandatory data retention, calling it a "national problem that requires federal legislation." Gonzales has convened earlier private meetings to pressure industry representatives. And last month, Republicans introduced a mandatory data retention bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would let the attorney general dictate what must be stored and for how long.
11:12:46 PM
|
|
DoJ Mulls Tracking Picture Uploads.
Dominus Suus
passed us a link to a C|Net article about a disturbing threat to
privacy from the Justice Department. According to the article, a
private meeting was held Wednesday between Justice officials and
telecom industry representatives. With individuals from companies such
as AOL and Comcast looking on, the officials continued overtures to
increase data retention by ISPs on American citizens. This week, they
were specifically looking to have records kept of photo uploads.
In this way, and 'in case police determine the content is illegal and
choose to investigate,' an easy trail from A to Z will be available.
The article provides a good deal of background on the Bush
Administration's history with data retention, with ties to events even
older than the Bush presidency. --- "The Justice Department's request
for information about compliance costs echoes a decade-ago debate over
wiretapping digital telephones, which led to the 1994 Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. To reduce opposition by telephone
companies, Congress set aside $500 million for reimbursement and the
legislation easily cleared both chambers by voice votes. Once Internet
providers come up with specific figures, privacy advocates worry,
Congress will offer to write a generous check to cover all compliance
costs and the process will repeat itself." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
10:57:23 PM
|
|
Hundreds of millions of Americans will have until 2013 to be
outfitted with new digital ID cards, the Bush administration said on
Thursday in a long-awaited announcement that reveals details of how the
new identification plan will work.
The announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security offers a
five-year extension to the deadline for states to issue the ID cards, and proposes creating the equivalent of a national database that would include details on all 240 million licensed drivers.
According to the draft regulations (PDF), which were required by Congress in the 2005 Real ID Act and are unlikely to assuage privacy and cost concerns raised by state legislatures:
âo¢ The Real ID cards must include all drivers' home addresses and other
personal information printed on the front and in a two-dimensional
barcode on the back. The barcode will not be encrypted because of
"operational complexity," which means that businesses like bars and
banks that require ID would be capable of scanning and recording
customers' home addresses.
âo¢ A radio frequency identification (RFID) tag is under
consideration. Homeland Security is asking for input on how the
licenses could incorporate "RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, in
addition to" the two-dimensional barcode requirement.
10:52:36 PM
|
|
Homeland Security Offers Details on Real ID.
pr0nqu33n writes "C|Net is running an article on the DHS's requirements for the Real ID system.
Thursday members of the Bush administration finally unveiled details of
the anticipated national identification program. Millions of Americans
will have until 2013 to register for the system, which will (some would
argue) constitute a national ID. RFID trackers for the cards are under
consideration, as is a cohesive nation-wide design for the card. States
must submit a proposal for how they'll adopt the system by early
October of this year. If they don't, come May of next year their
residents will see their licenses unable to gain them access to federal
buildings and airplanes. The full regulations for the system are available online in PDF format. Likewise, the DHS has a Questions and Answers style FAQ available to explain the program to the curious." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
10:48:45 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/4/07; 2:39:55 AM.
|
|
| March 2007 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| Feb Apr |
|
|