| |
|
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
|
|
The Canadian parliament has voted against renewing two controversial anti-terror measures that had been adopted after the 11 September attacks.
The measures allowed suspects to be detained without charge for three days and could compel witnesses to testify.
The minority Conservative government accused the opposition Liberals of being soft on terror.
The vote comes days after the Supreme Court revoked a law allowing foreign suspects to be detained indefinitely.
Neither measure has ever been used since they were brought in by the then ruling Liberals after the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001.
To allay human rights concerns, the measures were given a five-year limit and expire on 1 March.
6:32:01 PM
|
|
Canada Rejects Anti-Terror Laws.
Coryoth writes "The Canadian parliament has voted against renewing anti-terror laws
that had been introduced after September 11, 2001. The rejected laws
included provisions to hold terror suspects indefinitely, and to compel
witnesses to testify, and were in some sense Canada's version fo the
Patriot Act. The laws were voted down in the face of claims from the
minority Conservative government that the Liberal Party was soft on
terror, and despite the fact that Canada has faced active terrorist cells
in their own country. The anti-terror laws have never been used, and it
was viewed that they are neither relevant, nor needed, in dealing with
terrorist plots. Hopefully more countries will come to the same
conclusion." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
6:28:09 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/4/07; 2:47:11 AM.
|
|
| February 2007 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
| Jan Mar |
|
|