| |
|
Saturday, March 3, 2007
|
|
Blacklists appear to be the rage
these days. With the ease of storing and sharing personal information
-- coupled with lax privacy law restrictions on such activities --
companies can increasingly create blacklists of bad customers. In this article from the Ottawa Citizen,
hotels in Australia and Canada (and soon the United States) are signing
up for a service that compiles a blacklist against "bad" hotel guests:
11:55:39 PM
|
|
Telco customers at risk for online privacy breach. A study released by the Customer Respect Group indicates that telecommunications companies are slipping when it comes to customer privacy, especially in comparison to retail and high-tech industries. A majority of companies surveyed were dound to ask for excessive, inappropriate personal data. [Computerworld Privacy News]
11:51:07 PM
|
|
Under pressure from state investigators, Best Buy is now confirming my
reporting that its stores have a secret intranet site that has been
used to block some consumers from getting cheaper prices advertised on
BestBuy.com.
Company spokesman Justin Barber, who in early February denied the
existence of the internal website that could be accessed only by
employees, says his company is "cooperating fully" with the state
attorney general's investigation.
Barber insists that the company never intended to mislead customers.
State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal ordered the investigation
into Best Buy's practices on Feb. 9 after my column disclosed the
website and showed how employees at two Connecticut stores used it to
deny customers a $150 discount on a computer advertised on BestBuy.com.
Blumenthal said Wednesday that Best Buy has also confirmed to his
office the existence of the intranet site, but has so far failed to
give clear answers about its purpose and use.
"Their responses seem to raise as many questions as they answer,"
Blumenthal said in an interview. "Their answers are less than crystal
clear."
11:26:10 PM
|
|
RIAA's 'Expert' Witness Testimony Now Online.
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The online community now has an opportunity to see the fruits of its labor. Back in December, the Slashdot ('What Questions Would You Ask an RIAA Expert?') and Groklaw
('Another Lawyer Would Like to Pick Your Brain, Please') communities
were asked for their input on possible questions to pose to the RIAA's
'expert'. Dr. Doug Jacobson of Iowa State University, was scheduled to
be deposed in February in UMG v. Lindor,
for the first time in any RIAA case. Ms. Lindor's lawyers were flooded
with about 1400 responses. The deposition of Dr. Jacobson went forward on February 23, 2007, and the transcript is now available online (pdf) (ascii).
Ray Beckerman, one of Ms. Lindor's attorneys, had this comment: 'We are
deeply grateful to the community for reviewing our request, for giving
us thoughts and ideas, and for reviewing other readers' responses. Now
I ask the tech community to review this all-important transcript, and
bear witness to the shoddy investigation and junk science upon which
the RIAA has based its litigation war against the people. The computer
scientists among you will be astounded that the RIAA has been permitted
to burden our court system with cases based upon such arrant and
careless nonsense.'" [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
10:43:58 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/4/07; 3:02:17 AM.
|
|
| March 2007 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| Feb Apr |
|
|