| |
|
Sunday, March 4, 2007
|
|
Reuters yesterday reported on a recently issued study on future technologies written by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board.
More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillance
system that would put Big Brother to shame, and they're looking at the
commercial sector to provide it:
10:34:51 PM
|
|
The Pentagon Wants a 'TiVo' to Watch You. An anonymous reader writes "Danger Room, a Wired blog, today cites a study of future electronic snooping technologies from Reuters, written by the Pentagon's Defense Science Board. More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillance system that would put Big Brother to shame, and they're looking at the commercial sector to provide it. 'The ability to record terabyte and larger databases will provide an omnipresent knowledge of the present and the past that can be used to rewind battle space observations in TiVo-like fashion and to run recorded time backwards to help identify and locate even low-level enemy forces. For example, after a car bomb detonates, one would have the ability to play high-resolution data backward in time to follows the vehicle back to the source, and then use that knowledge to focus collection and gain additional information by organizing and searching through archived data.'" [Slashdot]
10:31:33 PM
|
|
Angry Ex Goes Too Far. A Virginia man endangers his ex-girlfriend after she dumps him by leaving explicit DVDs of the two of them on car windshields, along with her contact information. In Sex Drive Daily. [Wired News: Top Stories]
9:49:40 PM
|
|
SAN FRANCISCO -- It's Round 2 in Congress' bid
to craft federal law that would require businesses to notify U.S.
consumers about computer data-security breaches.
Legislation introduced in February soon could
become law, given the cooperative tone of federal lawmakers, says Ari
Schwartz, a privacy advocate and deputy director of the Center for
Democracy & Technology. That would be a reversal from the previous
few years, when members of the House and Senate could not agree on a
national data-breach law, and dozens of states passed their own laws.
But the feds waited too long to act, and their
actions now are unnecessary, say state legislators and privacy
advocates. "With so many conflicting agendas from the financial
industry, data brokers and security companies, there is the danger any
bill could be watered down," says Evan Hendricks, editor of Privacy Times newsletter.
The fear is that a federal law would pre-empt
stronger state laws. "A national standard that provides less protection
than currently afforded is really a step backward, not a step forward,"
says state Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Calif., author of the first law in the
USA that required companies to publicly disclose data breaches.
More than 100 million records containing
personal information have been subject to some sort of security breach
since February 2005, starting with data broker ChoicePoint, according
to the non-profit Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
There are at least four bills in Congress this
year to address data-breach notification that would pre-empt 35 state
laws on the books.
9:44:27 PM
|
|
The openLiberty Project, announced in January 2007, is a global open source initiative formed to provide open source developers with tools for integrating the privacy and security services of multivendor Liberty Federation and Liberty Web Services into many new identity-based services. In this episode, Jason Rouault discusses openLiberty, and how it could accelerate rollout of Web services, such as presence, contact book, geolocation and calendaring. Rouault also talks about openLiberty's choice of the Apache open source license, how openLiberty could lead to stronger integration between Liberty and Eclipse. why the Liberty form of geolocation is preferable to mobile carriers' typical methods. He also touches on the Liberty People Service, why Liberty's standards work is superior to work at OASIS, and answers Scott's obligatory Microsoft question.
9:10:45 PM
|
|
Many developers, especially small start-ups, are being out-competed
by the big name players in financial terms. Regulations, including the
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA, are major
challenges for start-ups, because they lack armies of lawyers. In a
humorous and sarcastic presentation, Brad Templeton of EFF considers
the implications of government-mandated wiretapping. While
consumers are concerned about their privacy, they also struggle to keep
their digital identities organized. Johannes Ernst of NetMesh explains
projects that have sprung up to provide unified identification and
authentication for all of our digital communication. LID, OpenID, and
i-names are providing consumers with interoperable digital identities
in a world where new methods of communication and collaboration are
invented daily.
9:08:51 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/18/07; 9:03:11 PM.
|
|
|