| |
|
Saturday, March 3, 2007
|
|
The state of the government's cybersecurity
position has improved over the past year, but significant holes remain,
especially in the areas of categorizing the risk level of systems and
training, according to the Office of Management and Budget.
OMB
found that more than 700 systems, including 397 managed by agencies,
had not been categorized as high, medium or low risk. Also, the
administration said more agency employees have received information
technology security training -- up 10 percent since last year -- but
more needs to be done.
In its fourth annual Federal Information
Security Management Act report sent to Congress March 1, OMB said it
will rely on the Security Line of Business effort to better train
employees by using a standard program. OMB named three shared-service
centers for security training in February: the Office of Personnel
Management, the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International
Development, and the Defense Department.
11:38:06 PM
|
|
RIAA's 'Expert' Witness Testimony Now Online.
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The online community now has an opportunity to see the fruits of its labor. Back in December, the Slashdot ('What Questions Would You Ask an RIAA Expert?') and Groklaw
('Another Lawyer Would Like to Pick Your Brain, Please') communities
were asked for their input on possible questions to pose to the RIAA's
'expert'. Dr. Doug Jacobson of Iowa State University, was scheduled to
be deposed in February in UMG v. Lindor,
for the first time in any RIAA case. Ms. Lindor's lawyers were flooded
with about 1400 responses. The deposition of Dr. Jacobson went forward on February 23, 2007, and the transcript is now available online (pdf) (ascii).
Ray Beckerman, one of Ms. Lindor's attorneys, had this comment: 'We are
deeply grateful to the community for reviewing our request, for giving
us thoughts and ideas, and for reviewing other readers' responses. Now
I ask the tech community to review this all-important transcript, and
bear witness to the shoddy investigation and junk science upon which
the RIAA has based its litigation war against the people. The computer
scientists among you will be astounded that the RIAA has been permitted
to burden our court system with cases based upon such arrant and
careless nonsense.'" [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
10:43:58 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/4/07; 10:04:35 AM.
|
|
| March 2007 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| Feb Apr |
|
|