Security
Security issues, software and reports.

 


















Subscribe to "Security" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Saturday, February 24, 2007


Since 9/11, we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars defending ourselves from terrorist attacks. Stories about the ineffectiveness of many of these security measures are common, but less so are discussions of why they are so ineffective. In short: Much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.
11:58:46 PM    

Wired has a thought-provoking piece this morning from security expert Bruce Schneier - headlined "Why smart cops do dumb things". It makes the case that the bulk of post-9/11 homeland security excesses stem from a most natural of human instincts: the need to cover one's ass.

The headline is misleading in that the essay is not about police officers specifically, but rather public safety officials, politicians and regulators of all stripes. But on the broader score the column is dead-on accurate: We've scared ourselves half to death and thus practically demand that those entrusted with keeping us safe go to absurd extremes to keep from being scapegoated should something go wrong. ... And something will go wrong. That part of the equation is not irrational.

The only quibble I have with Schneier's assessment is his conclusion that "there might not be a solution." Call me a crazy optimist (you'd be the first), but I've got to believe there's a way out of this knot.


11:53:52 PM    

Human Nature Trumps Homeland Security. netbuzz writes "Security expert Bruce Schneier suggests this morning that 'there might not be a solution' to our post-9/11 penchant for making domestic anti-terrorism decisions based on the basic human desire to cover one's backside. He might be right. But shouldn't we at least try to figure out a better way? For example, wouldn't 'Commonsense Homeland Security' be a winning political banner, not a risky one? " [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
11:41:19 PM    

Fraudsters Declare War on Anti-Scam Services.

Spammers have been attacking and threatening several of the groups and individuals who have been performing some of the most important work in hobbling online scams, spam and computer viruses.

The SANS Internet Storm Center on Thursday found a piece of malicious code (called "sans.exe") designed to update a group of several thousand infected computers that SANS has been monitoring. The code includes text strings that suggest an attack on the center if two of its crime fighters don't stop interfering with his money-making spam operations. The message, in part, read:

"You better f*** off SANS.org especially that [SANS chief technology officer] Johannes Ullrich (phone and e-mail address deleted) and Kevin Hong (phone and e-mail address deleted). I really don't have anything against you, just piss off alright?" [sic]

"I guess we always felt like this [was] going to happen at some point," Ullrich said in an online chat with Security Fix this morning. "Adding taunts like this to their code isn't what you would expect from a professional criminal trying to stay low profile. [It] points to a more juvenile 'hooligan' mentality," than hardened cyber crook.

Last month, a number of anti-spam Web sites came under a sustained "distributed denial of service" (DDoS) attack, an electronic assault during which the attackers use thousands of compromised personal computers to overwhelm a target with so much bogus traffic that the PCs can't accommodate legitimate visitors.

The attacks were made possible by tens of thousands - perhaps millions - of computers infected by the recent e-mail virus known as the "Storm worm. The virus links all infected computers into a peer-to-peer data network using the same technology as the eDonkey file-sharing network. The attackers later instructed the networked machines to attack sites such as spam trackers Spamhaus and the personal Web site of Joe Stewart, the SecureWorks researcher who conducted some of the most detailed analysis of the Storm worm.

The Web sites for CastleCops -- an all-volunteer, online scam fighting community -- also have been under a consistent denial-of-service attack for the past couple of weeks. Its main site and user forum are not working again this morning. Security Fix has spotlighted the laudable work this volunteer group does in bringing down phishing Web sites and analyzing new malicious software.

CastleCops co-founder Robin Laudanski said the intermittent site shutdowns have been inconvenient, but added that they have bolstered support for the group from within the security community.

"I take [the attacks] as a compliment because if we weren't putting a dent in the bad guys' pocketbooks, we wouldn't be getting attacked," Laudanski said. "It means we're being a pain, and that we're doing something right."

[Security Fix]
11:15:24 PM    

Congressman Wants Answers About TSA Site.

Citing reports by Security Fix and Wired, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is demanding that the Transportation Security Administration produce a raft of documents to explain why it created a Web site for airline travelers that lacked basic security protections.

In a letter sent Friday to the assistant secretary of the TSA, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) ordered the agency to produce all documents "relating to the period during which the site operated without encrypted data transfer protections, including the number of travelers who may have submitted their personal information to the site during the period when the site was not SSL-protected." The TSA has until March 9 to submit the documents.

Referring to reporting by Wired's 27B Stroke 6 blogger Ryan Singel about numerous spelling errors on the site, Waxman noted: "In fact, the overall appearance of the site was so poor that web experts first assumed it was a so-called 'phishing' site, a site internet hackers had created to look like a TSA website page."

The "Travel Verification Identity Program" Web site was designed to provide redress for airline travelers who have been delayed or prevented from boarding a plane on account of their name matching an identical one on the agency's "no-fly" list. The Department of Homeland Security has since launched a new version of the site that addresses most of the concerns expressed in Waxman's letter.

[Security Fix]
10:46:38 PM    

In the wake of a federal judge criticizing the NYPD's videotaping procedures last week, I-Witness Video looks at what the NYPD actually uses to record public events and calls it "360 degrees of surveillance," best illustrated by what the police used during the 2004 Republican National Convention.

Officers used "lipstick cameras" which are easily concealed, as well as helicopters with "military-style infrared imaging." And Fuji lent the NYPD its BlimpCam, and I-Witness Video describes the blimpcam footage from August 27, 2004:


10:16:23 PM    


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 3/4/07; 10:43:59 AM.

February 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28      
Jan   Mar