| |
|
Monday, July 31, 2006
|
|
The Future of Crime - Biometric Spoofing? AxisPower9 writes "What we often watch in films and television - circumventing biometric security access - is turning from science-fiction to reality. Bori Toth, biometric research and advisory lead at Deloitte & Touche, warned that biometric spoofing is a growing concern. From the article: 'We are leaving our prints everywhere so the chance of someone lifting them and copying them is real. Currently it's only researchers that are doing spoofing and copying. It's not a mainstream activity--but it will be. Many people are trying to regard biometrics as secret but they aren't. Our faces and irises are visible and our voices are being recorded. Fingerprints and DNA are left everywhere we go and it's been proved that these are real threats.'" [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
12:35:52 PM
|
|
Has Orwell's '1984' Come 22 Years Later? gabec asks: "This weekend my mother bought a grille lighter, something like this butane lighter. The self-scanner at Kroger's locked itself up and paged a clerk, who had to enter our drivers license numbers into her kiosk before we could continue. Last week my girlfriend bought four peaches. An alert came up stating that peaches were a restricted item and she had to identify herself before being able to purchase such a decidedly high quantity of the dangerous fruit. My video games spy on me, reporting the applications I run, the websites I visit, the accounts of the people I IM. My ISP is being strong-armed into a two-year archive of each action I take online under the guise of catching pedophiles, the companies I trust to free information are my enemies, the people looking out for me are being watched. As if that weren't enough, my own computer spies on me daily, my bank has been compromised, my phone is tapped--has been for years--and my phone company is A-OK with it. What's a guy that doesn't even consider himself paranoid to think of the current state of affairs?" The sad state of affairs is that Big Brother probably became a quiet part of our lives a lot earlier. The big question now is: how much worse can it get? [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
12:32:03 PM
|
|
Microsoft Adds Risky System-Wide Undelete to Vista. douder writes "Windows Vista will have a new 'previous versions' feature when it ships next year. According to Ars Technica, the feature is built off of the volume shadow copy technology from Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. Now turned on by default, the service stores the modified versions of a user's documents, even after they are deleted. They also report that you can browse folders from within Explorer to see snapshots of what they contained over time. It can be disabled, but this seems like a privacy concern." From the article: "Some users will find the feature objectionable because it could give the bossman a new way to check up on employees, or perhaps it could be exploited in some nefarious way by some nefarious person. Previous versions of Windows were still susceptible to undelete utilities, of course, but this new functionality makes browsing quite, quite simple. On the other hand, it should be noted that 'Previous Versions' does not store its data in the files themselves. That is, unlike Microsoft Office's 'track changes,' files protected with 'Previous Versions' will not carry their documentary history with them." [Slashdot: Your Rights Online]
12:22:01 PM
|
|
theodp writes "Newsweek reports that high-schoolers are being denied the joy of ordering unhealthy lunches thanks to their schools' adoption of services like MealpayPlus.
New web-based services allow moms to prepay for cafeteria food, specify
what their kid can and can't buy, and go online to track his purchases." --- From the article: "If
the child tries to buy a prohibited item, an alert flashes on the
cashier's computer. Of course, the system isn't foolproof. According to
a KRC Research survey, 73 percent of 8- to 12-year-olds are throwing
out part of their lunches at least once a week; 36 percent are trading
them."--- All I ever got was PB&J.
12:07:45 PM
|
|
The US admninistration is not looking for this law change to enable
them to "Better fight the War On Terror". The truth is that the US
Administration need the law relaxed because they think that it will
then make it easier for them to get a retrospective law change that may
further help them to crawl out of a rather deep set of legal and
constitutional holes that they currently find themselves in. You see,
the Dubya administration has trampled all over the laws of the US and
the Constitution itself and they have, as seen in the video, admitted
it along the way. The problems they now face are coming from all
directions such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation's successful application to sue AT&T for handing over phone records without a warrant. The President has already blocked one investigation into his conduct regarding this issue and now they are looking to srike down all others before they even get started.
12:05:21 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2006 Paul Hardwick.
Last update: 8/1/06; 8:39:22 PM.
|
|
|