<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.2.1 on Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:22:40 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Paul Hardwick: Alerts</title>		<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/</link>		<description>Alerts and warnings about important events and problems.</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:22:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.2.1</generator>		<managingEditor>editor.radio (-at-) MacRonin.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>webmaster.radio(-at-) MacRonin.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>6</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>7</hour>			<hour>8</hour>			</skipHours>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>Google&apos;s Blog Software Hijacked by Scammers. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8873</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/102281165/article.html&quot;&gt;Google&apos;s Blog Software Hijacked by Scammers&lt;/a&gt;. Google&apos;s blogger.com is being hijacked to spread malware through fake blogs, a security vendor warns. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8873</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 02:58:36 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Hackers Promise Month of MySpace Bugs. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8871</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/102318748/article.html&quot;&gt;Hackers Promise Month of MySpace Bugs&lt;/a&gt;. They won&apos;t divulge their real names, they call their project a &quot;whiny, attention-seeking ploy,&quot; and they appear to take their fashion cues from Beastie Boys music videos. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8871</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:58:02 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Administrivia: Possible unscheduled upgrade of Privacy Digest</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8870</link>			<description>Administrivia: Possible unscheduled upgrade of Privacy Digest. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might be implementing an unscheduled upgrade of the site due to some problems with the software I am currently using to run the site. I had been working on upgrading the software to implement some new features but may have to implement sooner than originally planned. If you would like to take a peek at the planned software take a visit to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/index.php&quot;&gt;http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/index.php&lt;/a&gt; Yes the full URL will have to be entered until I have completed the switch over. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There may be some hiccups during the process as the XML/RSS location will change along with access to the sub-topics. I plan to create mod-rewrite rules to take of this but they may not all be ready on day one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please let me know what you think. </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8870</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:39:04 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Your Clickstream Data: 40 cents; Losing Your Privacy: Priceless.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8866</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/16/your-clickstream-data-40-cents-losing-your-privacy-priceless/&quot;&gt;Your Clickstream Data: 40 cents; Losing Your Privacy: Priceless&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/03/16/isps-apparently-sell-your-clickstream-data/&quot;&gt;Adam Fields points&lt;/a&gt; to this &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/29449&quot;&gt;disturbing revelation&lt;/a&gt; that ISPs  are apparently selling their customer[base &apos;]s clickstream data. The guilty ISPs apparently took the same &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/08/09/aol-search-log-profiles-unmasked/&quot;&gt;[base &quot;]anonymization[per thou] seminar as AOL&lt;/a&gt;, merely replacing user names with User 1, User 2, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what kind of price are they charging for such a violation of user[base &apos;]s privacy? About 40 cents a month per user. Unbelievable.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/17.html#a8866</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:15:54 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Careful What You Search For..... LIVE WEBCAST</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8859</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/102216009/webcast.do&quot;&gt;Careful What You Search For....&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;font color=&quot;#990000&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;LIVE WEBCAST&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;(Source: Oracle)&lt;/b&gt; Security is the greatest single issue for IT groups today. IT must balance how to enable people to find the information they need to do their work, and at the same time protect the information they should not access. See how Oracle Secure Enterprise Search enables two organizations to deliver secure, low-cost, and easy-to-deploy search solutions that eliminate information overload, and are as easy to use as popular Internet search engines. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8859</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:43:39 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>FT.com  - Web censorship spreading globally</title>			<link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1dbb5faa-d268-11db-a7c0-000b5df10621.html</link>			<description>Internet censorship is spreading rapidly, being practised by about twodozen countries and applied to a far wider range of online informationand applications, according to research by a transatlantic group ofacademics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The warning comes a week after a Turkish court ordered the blockingof YouTube to silence offensive comments about Mustafa Kemal Ataturk,the founder of modern Turkey, marking the most visible attack yet on awebsite that has been widely adopted around the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A recentsix-month investigation into whether 40 countries use censorship showsthe practice is spreading, with new countries learning from experiencedpractitioners such as China and benefiting from technologicalimprovements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OpenNet Initiative, a project by Harvard Law Schooland the universities of Toronto, Cambridge and Oxford, repeatedly triedto call up specific websites from 1,000 international news and othersites in the countries concerned, and a selection of local-languagesites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The research found a trend towards censorship or, as JohnPalfrey, executive director of Harvard Law School&apos;s Berkman Center forInternet and Society, said, &quot;a big trend in the reverse direction&quot;,with many countries recently starting to adopt forms of onlinecensorship.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ronald Deibert, associate professor of politicalscience at the University of Toronto, said 10 countries had become&quot;pervasive blockers&quot;, regularly preventing their citizens seeing arange of online material. These included China, Iran, Saudi Arabia,Tunisia, Burma and Uzbekistan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New censorship techniques includethe periodic barring of complete applications, such as China&apos;s block onWikipedia or Pakistan&apos;s ban on Google&apos;s blogging service, and the useof more advanced technologies such as &quot;keyword filtering&quot;, which isused to track down material by identifying sensitive words.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Methodssuch as these are being copied as countries new to censorship learnfrom those with more experience. &quot;There&apos;s a growing awareness of bestpractice - or rather, worst practice,&quot; Mr Deibert said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8854</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:14:16 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Web Censorship on the Increase. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8853</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/101985236/article.pl&quot;&gt;Web Censorship on the Increase&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;			mid-devonian writes &quot;Close on the heels of the temporary &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/07/1417237&amp;amp;tid=153&quot;&gt;blocking of YouTube by a Turkish judge&lt;/a&gt;, a group of academics has published research showing that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1dbb5faa-d268-11db-a7c0-000b5df10621.html&quot;&gt;Web censorship is on the increase&lt;/a&gt;worldwide. As many as two dozen countries are blocking content using avariety of techniques. Distressingly, the most censor-heavy countries(which includes China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Burma andUzbekistan) seem to be passing on their technologically sophisticatedtechniques to other areas of the world. &apos;New censorship techniquesinclude the periodic barring of complete applications, such as China&apos;sblock on Wikipedia or Pakistan&apos;s ban on Google&apos;s blogging service, andthe use of more advanced technologies such as &apos;keyword filtering&apos;,which is used to track down material by identifying sensitive words.&apos;&quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8853</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:10:15 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>PATRIOT Act Apologist Site Didn&apos;t Get the Memo.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8846</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005163.php&quot;&gt;PATRIOT Act Apologist Site Didn&apos;t Get the Memo&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Last week, the Department of Justice Inspector General&apos;s office released a damning &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; documenting the FBI abusing its powers under the PATRIOT Act and violating the law to collect Americans&apos; telephone, Internet, financial, credit, and other personal records about Americans without judicial approval.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears that not everyone at the DOJ got the memo.  The DOJ&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/&quot;&gt;Life and Liberty&lt;/a&gt; website, a site dedicated to defending the honor of the PATRIOT Act during the re-authorization process last spring, still reads as if nothing has changed. Particularly in the light of the newly revealed truth, many of the quotes now seem (at best) naive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under the headline of &quot;Examining the Facts&quot;, the DOJ asserts that PATRIOT has &quot;four-year track record with no verified civil liberties abuses.&quot;  The site quotes an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-03-01-opposing-view_x.htm&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; by former House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Zero. That&apos;s the number of substantiated USA PATRIOT Act civil liberties violations. Extensive congressional oversight found no violations. Six reports by the Justice Department&apos;s independent Inspector General, who is required to solicit and investigate any allegations of abuse, found no violations.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wow, that sure sounds good. Unfortunately, the new report reveals that is is simply not true: the inspector general identifies dozens of instances in which extra-judicial demands for personal information -- known as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt; -- may have violated laws and agency regulations. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/archive.htm&quot;&gt;Archive section&lt;/a&gt;, the site includes quotes from an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/cgi-bin/outside.cgi?http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20050616-100902-5508r.htm&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; by Senator Pat Roberts responding to critics like ourselves:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I regret to say it, but the rhetoric of those opposed to permanently authorizing the act has no substance and borders on paranoia. Opponents have criticized the act for years but can cite only hypothetical abuses. Facts are stubborn things. The actual record is quite clear - there have been no substantiated allegations of abuse of Patriot Act authorities, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Critics could only point to hypothetical abuses because the fox was guarding the hen house.  Senator Roberts also opined that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Through aggressive congressional oversight, we know the FBI uses Patriot Act authorities within the law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s now clearer than ever that the oversight was not aggressive enough, with the report documenting that the FBI decieved Congress about its use of the letters.  The report is likely only the tip of the iceberg.  Immediate and thorough oversight hearings are necessary to uncover the truth and hold the Administration accountable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=283&quot;&gt;Tell Congress to defend your privacy now.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/16.html#a8846</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:45:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Core Security | CoreLabs - OpenBSD&apos;s IPv6 mbufs remote kernel buffer overflow</title>			<link>http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentMod&amp;action=item&amp;id=1703</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Vulnerability Description&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The OpenBSD kernel contains a memory corruption vulnerability in thecode that handles IPv6 packets. Exploitation of this vulnerability canresult in:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Remote execution of arbitrary code at the kernel level on the vulnerable systems (complete system compromise), or;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Remote denial of service attacks against vulnerable systems (system crash due to a kernel panic)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue can be triggered by sending a specially crafted IPv6 fragmented packet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OpenBSD systems using default installations are vulnerable becausethe default pre-compiled kernel binary (GENERIC) has IPv6 enabled andOpenBSD&apos;s firewall does not filter inbound IPv6 packets in its defaultconfiguration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/15.html#a8842</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:42:23 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Remote Exploit Discovered for OpenBSD.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/15.html#a8841</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/101820887/article.pl&quot;&gt;Remote Exploit Discovered for OpenBSD&lt;/a&gt;. An anonymous reader writes &quot;OpenBSD is known for its security policies, and for its boast of &quot;only one remote exploit in over 10 years&quot;. Well, make that two, because Core Security has found a&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentMod&amp;amp;action=item&amp;amp;id=1703&quot;&gt; remotely exploitable buffer overflow&lt;/a&gt; in the OpenBSD kernel. Upgrade your firewalls as soon as possible.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/15.html#a8841</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:39:14 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>New Fraudulent Adware Uses Rootkit Techniques. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/15.html#a8834</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104424&amp;amp;ti=New+Fraudulent+Adware+Uses+Rootkit+Techniques&quot;&gt;New Fraudulent Adware Uses Rootkit Techniques&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Under no circumstances should users download applications through pop-up ads, or shortcuts that suddenly appear on the desktop.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/15.html#a8834</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:16:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Four Colorado Counties Placed on Election Watch List.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8814</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104367&amp;amp;ti=Four+Colorado+Counties+Placed+on+Election+Watch+List&quot;&gt;Four Colorado Counties Placed on Election Watch List&lt;/a&gt;. Errors with voting machines, delays in voting, inadequate security cited. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8814</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:04:05 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Latest ID-Theft Worry? Copiers. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8811</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/101464208/PHOTOCOPIER_RISKS&quot;&gt;Latest ID-Theft Worry? Copiers&lt;/a&gt;. Digital photocopiers use hard drives to store data. If not properly secured, they can be vulnerable to data thieves. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8811</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:55:53 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Medical data on Blue Cross members may be lost | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Medical+data+on+Blue+Cross+members+may+be+lost/2100-1029_3-6167066.html?tag=nefd.top</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;WellPoint, one of the nation&apos;s largest health insurers, has begunnotifying 75,000 members of its Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield unitin New York that a CD holding their vital medical and other personalinformation has disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The information was on an unencrypted disc that a subcontractorrecently sent to Magellan Behavioral Services, a company in Avon,Conn., that specializes in monitoring and coordinating mental healthand substance abuse treatments for insurance companies. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Empire began notifying the affected consumers by mail on Saturday thattheir records--including their names, Social Security numbers, healthplan identification numbers and description of medical services back to2003--had been lost. &lt;/p&gt;[...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before shipping the information to Magellan, the coding and passwordsthat protect the privacy of the information was removed by a Magellansubcontractor, Lisa Ann Greiner, an Empire spokeswoman, said Tuesday. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Janlori Goldman, the director of the Health Privacy Center, a nonprofitorganization in Washington, said the error was an &quot;egregious breach ofprivacy.&quot; She said that insurance companies were responsible under afederal privacy law for ensuring that their contractors use adequatesecurity procedures. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greiner said that the subcontractor, Health Data Management Services,worked for Magellan, not Empire. &quot;If any contract was breached, we aregoing to take direct action,&quot; she said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8808</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:41 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Apple Releases a Bushel of Software Patches.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8800</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/apple_patches_nearly_four_doze.html&quot;&gt;Apple Releases a Bushel of Software Patches&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Today turned out to be &quot;Patch Tuesday&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/patch_reprieve_for_marchs_blac.html&quot;&gt;after all&lt;/a&gt;, only the security updates were released by &lt;strong&gt;Apple&lt;/strong&gt; instead of Microsoft. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple issued security updates to plug at least 46 separate security holes in its operating system and other software. The updates are available through &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305214&quot;&gt;Apple&apos;s site&lt;/a&gt; or via the built-in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/softwareupdates.html&quot;&gt;Software Update&lt;/a&gt; feature. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nearly one-third of the fixes mend flaws outlined in the controversial &lt;a href=&quot;http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Month of Kernel Bugs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://applefun.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Month of Apple Bugs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; projects from November 2006 and January 2007, respectively. Also included was a patch for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://applefun.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2007-01-25T16%3A17%3A00-08%3A00&amp;amp;max-results=7&quot;&gt;serious flaw in Apple&apos;s Software Update&lt;/a&gt; application. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A number of the patches address third-party applications built for use on Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server systems. Today&apos;s bundle fixes at least seven bugs in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/news-4-1-x.html&quot;&gt;MySQL&lt;/a&gt; database software, and two flaws in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openssh.org/txt/release-4.5&quot;&gt;OpenSSH&lt;/a&gt;, a tool used to encrypt online communications. Other programs patched in this release include &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305215&quot;&gt;iPhoto&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;QuickDraw&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Adobe&apos;s Flash Player&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/14.html#a8800</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:35:07 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF: Paper: Who Controls Your Television?</title>			<link>http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Today, consumers can digitally record their favorite television shows,move recordings to portable video players, excerpt a small clip toinclude in a home video, and much more. The digital televisiontransition promises innovation and competition in even more greatgadgets that will give consumers unparalleled control over theirmedia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; But an inter-industry organization that creates television andvideo specifications used in Europe, Australia, and much of Africa andAsia is laying the foundation for a far different future -- one inwhich major content providers get a veto over innovation and consumersface draconian &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/&quot;&gt;digital rights management (DRM)&lt;/a&gt;restrictions on the use of TV content. At the behest of American movieand television studios, the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB)is devising standards to ensure that digital television devices obeycontent providers&apos; commands rather than consumers&apos; desires.  Theserestrictions will take away consumers&apos; rights and abilities to uselawfully-acquired content so that each use can be sold back to thempiecemeal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consumers would never choose this future, so Hollywood will try toforce it on them by regulatory fiat. DVB&apos;s imprimatur may putrestrictive standards on the fast-track to becoming legally-enforcedmandates, and existing laws already limit evasion of DRM even forlawful purposes. In effect, private DRM standards will trump nationallaws that have traditionally protected the public&apos;s interests andcarefully circumscribed copyright holders&apos; rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Hollywood has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/broadcastflag&quot;&gt;long pursued&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/pnp&quot;&gt;this goal&lt;/a&gt; in the U.S., but its schemes in DVB havetaken place behind the public&apos;s back and outside of scrutiny byelected officials. In this paper, we will summarize and exposeHollywood&apos;s plan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is the only publicinterest group to have attended DVB&apos;s closed technical meetings. As acondition of participation, DVB imposed restrictions on our ability toreport on these meetings. Now, after key parts of DVB&apos;s new DRMspecification have been sent to the European standards body and maysoon be provided to other EU regulators, we are releasing this paperto help consumer organizations and EU regulators understand thesignificant public policy implications of various DVB work items.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; CPCM: A System to Control Innovation, Competition, and Television Viewers&amp;nbsp;&lt;p&gt;Despite record profits in recent years, American movie and televisionstudios have not relented in their cries that new technologies are amortal threat to their industry. They sued to block the VCR and thefirst mass-market Digital Video Recorder (DVR) in the U.S., and,having failed to stamp out recording in those efforts, they haveincreasingly turned to creating restrictive technical standards backedby law.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8795</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:46:30 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Action Alert: Reform the PATRIOT Act and Stop the Abuse of Surveillance Powers!</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8792</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005158.php&quot;&gt;Action Alert: Reform the PATRIOT Act and Stop the Abuse of Surveillance Powers!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;p&gt;The FBI has blatantly abused a key PATRIOT Act provision and knowingly violated the law to spy on Americans&apos; telephone, Internet, and other personal records, as documented in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;a report&lt;/a&gt; recently released by the Justice Department. Congress must rein in this egregious behavior, but it can&apos;t stop there -- the Bush Administration&apos;s unprecedented pattern of disregarding the law stretches far beyond the examples in this report. &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=283&quot;&gt;Tell Congress to defend your privacy now.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before PATRIOT, the FBI could use so-called National Security Letters only for securing the records of suspected terrorists or spies. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;under PATRIOT&lt;/a&gt; the FBI can use them to get private records about anybody without any court approval as long as it believes the information could be relevant to an authorized terrorism or espionage investigation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to the Justice Department&apos;s Inspector General, the FBI&apos;s misuse of its authority included issuing NSLs to spy on people who weren&apos;t the subject of any existing investigation whatsoever. The FBI also lied to Congress and underreported its use of NSLs by many thousands. Worse still, the FBI has ignored its own lawyers&apos; advice and intentionally evaded PATRIOT&apos;s thin bounds, improperly requesting and obtaining personal records through so-called &quot;exigent letters&quot; that Congress never authorized.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s only a sampling of the horror story painted by the report, and, had Congress not ordered the Inspector General to review the FBI&apos;s activities last year, these abuses might have never been revealed. From the moment PATRIOT was passed, we said the NSL power was ripe for abuse and unconstitutional, and it&apos;s clearer than ever that Congress should repeal PATRIOT&apos;s expansion of NSL powers and reform the PATRIOT Act as a whole. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, Congress must broadly investigate the Administration&apos;s use of surveillance powers, including the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/nsa&quot;&gt;NSA&apos;s massive and illegal domestic spying program&lt;/a&gt;. Congress and the American public have been kept in the dark about such clear violations of the law and Americans&apos; privacy for far too long. Immediate and thorough oversight hearings are necessary to uncover the truth and hold the Administration accountable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=283&quot;&gt;Take action now.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8792</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:28:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>CDT Opposes Bill Expanding Pentagon Domestic Data Mining.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8789</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/979&quot;&gt;CDT Opposes Bill Expanding Pentagon Domestic Data Mining&lt;/a&gt;. CDT and other civil liberties groups are urging Congress to reject legislation that would exempt the Department of Defense from a key provision of the Privacy Act.  The little-noticed amendment, already included in the Senate version of the Intelligence Authorization Act, would permit government agencies to disclose information on US citizens to the Defense Department. Such language could pave the way for entire databases of information to be transferred to the Defense Department without a clear purpose -- in turn opening the door to greater data mining by military agencies. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8789</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:07:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>CDT Calls for Reform of National Security Letters. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8788</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/978&quot;&gt;CDT Calls for Reform of National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt;. CDT is calling on Congress to require judicial approval of FBI efforts to access the sensitive records of US citizens.  Recent revelations regarding violations in the use of so-called &quot;national security letters&quot; have shown that no matter how many internal controls the FBI adopts, self-certification in not sufficient when the government is obtaining the sensitive financial and communications records of citizens.  CDT believes Congress should reform the law and adopt a reasonable system of judicial checks and balances. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8788</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:04:02 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF Kills Bogus Clear Channel Patent.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8784</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_03.php#005155&quot;&gt;EFF Kills Bogus Clear Channel Patent&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Patent Busting Project Wins Victory for Artists and Innovators&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;San Francisco - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has announced it will revoke an illegitimate patent held by Clear Channel Communications after a campaign by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The patent covered a system and method of creating digital recordings of live performances. Clear Channel claimed the bogus patent created a monopoly on all-in-one technologies that produce post-concert digital recordings and threatened to sue those who made such recordings. This locked musical acts into using Clear Channel technology and blocked innovations by others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, EFF&apos;s investigation found that a company named Telex had in fact developed similar technology more than a year before Clear Channel filed its patent request. EFF -- in conjunction with patent attorney Theodore C. McCullough and with the help of Lori President and Ashley Bollinger, students at the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Clinic at American University&apos;s Washington College of Law -- asked the PTO to revoke the patent based on this and other extensive evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Bogus patents like this one are good examples of what&apos;s wrong with the current patent system,&quot; said EFF Staff Attorney Jason Schultz. &quot;We&apos;re glad that the Patent Office was willing to help artists and innovators out from under its shadow.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Clear Channel patent challenge was part of EFF&apos;s Patent Busting Project, aimed at combating the chilling effects bad patents have on public and consumer interests. The Patent Busting Project seeks to document the threats and fight back by filing requests for reexamination against the worst offenders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The patent system plays a critical role in business and the economy,&quot; said McCullough. &quot;Everyone loses if we allow overreaching patent claims to restrict the tremendous benefits of new software and technology development.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the notice from the Patent Office:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patent/wanted/clearchannel/notice_of_intent_to_cancel.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patent/wanted/clearchannel/notice_of_intent_to_cancel.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/patent/wanted/clearchannel/notice_of_intent_to_cancel.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on EFF&apos;s Patent Busting Project:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patent&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patent&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/patent&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Contacts:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jason Schultz&lt;br&gt;   Staff Attorney&lt;br&gt;   Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:jason@eff.org&quot;&gt;jason@eff.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Theodore C. McCullough&lt;br&gt;   Registered Patent Attorney&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:theo702000@yahoo.com&quot;&gt;theo702000@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/&quot;&gt;EFF: Breaking News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8784</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:55:43 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/news/index.xml">EFF: Breaking News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>American Studios&apos; Secret Plan to Lock Down European TV Devices.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8783</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_03.php#005156&quot;&gt;American Studios&apos; Secret Plan to Lock Down European TV Devices&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;EFF Exposes Standards Jeopardizing Innovation and Consumer Rights&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;San Francisco - An international consortium of television and technology companies is devising draconian anti-consumer restrictions for the next generation of TVs in Europe and beyond, at the behest of American entertainment giants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is the only public interest group to have gained entrance into the secretive meetings of the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB), a group that creates the television and video specifications used in Europe, Australia, and much of Asia and Africa. In a report released today, EFF shows how U.S. movie and television companies have convinced DVB to create new technical specifications that would build digital rights management technologies into televisions. These specifications are likely to take away consumers&apos; rights, which will subsequently be sold back to them piecemeal -- so entertainment fans will have to pay again and again for legitimate uses of lawfully acquired digital television content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;DVB is abetting a massive power grab by the content industry, and many of the world&apos;s largest technology companies are simply watching,&quot; said Ren Bucholz, EFF Policy Coordinator, Americas. &quot;This regime was concocted without input from consumer rights organizations or public interest groups, and it shows.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite recent record profits, American movie and television studios insist that new technologies could ruin their industry. In past battles against innovation, these same studios sued to block the sale of the VCR and the first mass-marketed digital video recorder in the U.S. Having failed in those efforts, they have now turned to creating technical standards that, when backed by law, are likely to restrict consumers&apos; existing rights and threaten the future of technological innovation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With DVB, the plan begun by entertainment companies in the U.S. has now gone global. EFF&apos;s report is aimed at alerting European consumer groups and consumers about the dangers posed by the proposed standards and providing informational resources for European regulators.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;DVB members&apos; active indifference, even hostility, to user rights is shameful,&quot; said EFF Staff Technologist Seth Schoen. &quot;When American studios ask for regulatory support for restrictions pushed through the DVB Project, public officials must stand up for consumer rights, sustain competition and innovation, and tell Hollywood to back off.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the full report:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EFF&apos;s 2005 Submission to the U.K. Department of Media, Sports and Culture:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_critique.php&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_critique.php&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_critique.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Contacts:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ren Bucholz&lt;br&gt;   Policy Coordinator, Americas&lt;br&gt;   Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:ren@eff.org&quot;&gt;ren@eff.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seth Schoen&lt;br&gt;   Staff Technologist&lt;br&gt;   Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:seth@eff.org&quot;&gt;seth@eff.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/&quot;&gt;EFF: Breaking News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/13.html#a8783</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:53:46 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/news/index.xml">EFF: Breaking News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Don&apos;t Let OneCare Eat Your Email - AppScout</title>			<link>http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/dont_let_onecare_eat_your_emai.php</link>			<description>&lt;span id=&quot;intelliTXT&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whenever a program gets wide distributionthere are bound to be some users who, rightly or wrongly, feel it hascaused them pain. Sometimes it&apos;s a case of &lt;em&gt;post hoc ergo propter hoc&lt;/em&gt;(Latin for &quot;the hog was here, so the hog did it&quot;). Other times therereally is a problem, perhaps due to an unusual configuration or acompatibility problem with some less-common applications. But it&apos;s rarethat the problem is as serious and the response as limited as in thiscase. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A reader brought to my attention a thread in Microsoft&apos;s discussion forums for Windows OneCare titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsOneCare/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1150100&amp;amp;SiteID=2&quot;&gt;Outlook and Outlook Express Mail Store Missing or Quarantined&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.The thread started with a message in January and it&apos;s still runningtoday, with no clear resolution. In brief, if you get a virus in anemail message received by Outlook, OneCare&apos;s next virus sweep may &lt;strong&gt;quarantine or delete your entire email store&lt;/strong&gt;. If you receive a virus via Outlook Express OneCare may &lt;strong&gt;quarantine or delete the entire folder&lt;/strong&gt; containing the virus. Really! &lt;/p&gt;                              &lt;a name=&quot;more&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;        &lt;p&gt;Asthe thread goes on, more and more users weigh in reporting the problem.Moderators attempt soothing responses like &quot;Obviously, the action byOneCare is undesirable. However, you can ... exclude the Outlook PSTfile&quot; and &quot;I know it won&apos;t make you feel any better, but you&apos;re allreally helping to make OneCare a better program for everyone&quot; and &quot;Younever want email scanned on the way in or out of the system as itcauses more problems than it fixes.&quot; At one or two points themoderators announce a fix, but the problem reports keep coming in. Onemoderator mused that this had been a problem in the beta of OneCare1.0, but he hadn&apos;t seen it since then. Another suggested that version1.5 may have been coded from the wrong &quot;code branch&quot; of the base1.0/1.1 version. Hmm....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8764</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:08:23 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Windows Live OneCare Can Eat Your Email.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8763</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100769730/article.pl&quot;&gt;Windows Live OneCare Can Eat Your Email&lt;/a&gt;. FutureDomain writes in to point us to a blog sponsored by PC Magazine,reporting about another problem with Windows Live OneCare. Apparently,it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/dont_let_onecare_eat_your_emai.php&quot;&gt;sometimes deletes the entire Outlook or Outlook Express .PST mailbox&lt;/a&gt;when it finds a virus in one of the messages. The only solution is totell OneCare to exclude the entire Outlook mailbox. This is thesoftware that &lt;a href=&quot;http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/03/1412215&amp;amp;tid=109&quot;&gt;came in last in antivirus tests&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsOneCare/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1150100&amp;amp;SiteID=2&quot;&gt;trail of tears is ongoing&lt;/a&gt; over on the Microsoft forums. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8763</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:04:30 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>SSL optimization over the WAN needs scrutiny - Network World</title>			<link>http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/030807-ssl-optimization.html</link>			<description> Rather than passing through SSL sessions between clients and servers located in remote data centers, some WAN optimization gear can terminate the SSL sessions, shrink the traffic and re-encrypt it for the next leg of the trip. These chains of encrypted sessions introduce potential vulnerabilities that different vendors address in different ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;SSL traffic represents a growing percentage of total traffic on WANlinks, according to Forrester Research. So SSL support in WANoptimization appliances will become more important to businesses thatwant to keep traffic secure while minimizing the size of their WANlinks. &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;p&gt;In a survey last month of 1,300 IT executives by WAN-optimization vendor &lt;a xmlns:o=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/office&quot; xmlns:st1=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/smarttags&quot; xmlns:w=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/word&quot; href=&quot;http://www.bluecoat.com&quot;&gt;Blue Coat Systems&lt;/a&gt;, one-third of respondents said that 25% of their WAN traffic is SSL. And of those surveyed, 45% plan to roll out more SSL                        applications this year.                     &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;p&gt;Abouta third of all WAN traffic at Richardson Partners Financial Ltd. inToronto is SSL, says Andrew McKinney, director of technical servicesfor the firm. But if only the urgent business traffic is considered,the percentage is much higher. &quot;For critical business traffic, it&apos;s allencrypted,&quot; he says. So he uses Blue Coat Systems gear to securetraffic and optimize it for good performance. &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8762</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:45:40 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>SSL Optimization Over WAN Needs Scrutiny.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8761</link>			<description>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100800112/article.pl&quot;&gt;SSL Optimization Over WAN Needs Scrutiny&lt;/a&gt;. coondoggie writes with word of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/030807-ssl-optimization.html&quot;&gt;expansion of WAN optimization appliances to handle SSL traffic &lt;/a&gt;and the security concerns this brings up. From the article: &quot;With more and more WAN optimization vendors extending their capabilities to include encrypted traffic, corporate IT executives have a decision to make: Should they trust the security these devices provide? Rather than passing through SSL sessions between clients and servers located in remote data centers, some WAN optimization gear can terminate the SSL sessions, shrink the traffic, and re-encrypt it for the next leg of the trip. These chains of encrypted sessions introduce potential vulnerabilities that different vendors address in different ways. SSL traffic represents a growing percentage of total traffic on WAN links, according to Forrester Research. So SSL support in WAN optimization appliances will become more important to businesses that want to keep traffic secure while minimizing the size of their WAN links.&quot; &lt;br&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8761</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:41:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Don&apos;t like ID cards? Hand over your passport | the Daily Mail</title>			<link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;ito=newsnow</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody who objects to their personal details going on the new &quot;BigBrother&quot; ID cards database will be banned from having a passport.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James Hall, the official in charge of the supposedly-voluntaryscheme, said the Government would allow people to opt out - but inreturn they must &quot;forgo the ability&quot; to have a travel document.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With one in every eight people saying they will refuse tosign-up, up to five million adults could effectively be refusedpermission to leave the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Campaigners reacted to Mr Hall&apos;s remarks with fury, saying theywere yet more evidence of the lurch towards &quot;Big Brother&quot; Britain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Phil Booth, of the NO2ID group, said: &quot;The idea that ID cards scheme is voluntary, and people can opt-out, is a joke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;There are all sorts of reasons why people need to travel, not just for holidays. There is work, visiting relatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;What are these people supposed to do? It stretches thedefinition of voluntary beyond breaking point. They will go to anylength to get personal information for this huge database. Who knowswhat will happen to it then?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8750</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:56:16 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8749</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100791998/article.pl&quot;&gt;No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waronfreedom.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UpnAtom&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;People who refuse to give up their &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6370627.stm&quot;&gt;bank records&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristol-no2id.org.uk/blog/?page_id=5&quot;&gt;tax records &amp;amp; details of any benefits they&apos;ve claimed&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article334686.ece&quot;&gt;records of their car movements for the last year&lt;/a&gt;, or refuse to submit to an interrogation on whether they are the same person that this mountain of data belongs to -- will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;amp;ito=newsnow&quot;&gt;denied passports&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.no2id.net/viewtopic.php?t=14792&quot;&gt;March 26th&lt;/a&gt;.The Blair government has already admitted that this and other data willbe cross-linked so that the Home Office and other officials can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1993055,00.html&quot;&gt;spy on the everyday lives of innocent Britons&lt;/a&gt;. Britons were already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-545269&quot;&gt;the most spied upon nation in Western Europe&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/09/1823255&amp;amp;tid=158&quot;&gt;more so even than Sweden&lt;/a&gt;.Data-mining through this unprecedented level of mass-surveillanceallows any future British government to leapfrog even countries likeChina and North Korea.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/11.html#a8749</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:52:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Big Brother State - An animated short about public surveillance by David Scharf</title>			<link>http://www.bigbrotherstate.com/</link>			<description>please also download using Bit Torrent: &lt;br&gt;(Xvid Version, ca. 50 MB, 768 px x 432 px) ---&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://torrentbox.com/download/94235/bbs_xvid.torrent&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; (Big FLV Version, 55 MB, 768 px x 432 px, use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.download.com/FLV-Player/3000-2139_4-10467081.html&quot;&gt;FLV Player&lt;/a&gt; to view) ---&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torrentbox.com/download/94221/bbs.torrent&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Check the Internet Archive for other resolutions and formats:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ia311541.us.archive.org/0/items/BigBrotherState/&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/10.html#a8745</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 03:06:35 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF Calls For Aggressive Congressional Hearings on National Security Letter Misuse.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/10.html#a8744</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005153.php&quot;&gt;EFF Calls For Aggressive Congressional Hearings on National Security Letter Misuse&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;EFF is calling for Congress to hold aggressive hearings on the FBI&apos;s domestic intelligence authority after the release of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;Justice Department report&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] showing the Bureau abusing its power to collect telephone, Internet, financial, credit, and other personal records about Americans without judicial approval.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vermont, has said the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings into the report&apos;s findings. But the widespread abuse detailed in the report requires more than just a cursory examination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Bureau&apos;s misuse of its intelligence authority is an ongoing critical problem,&quot; said EFF Staff Attorney Marcia Hofmann. &quot;Congress must use its investigative power to find out what&apos;s really going on at the FBI -- and then rein in the Bureau&apos;s investigative authority to where is was before the USA PATRIOT Act.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the report, the Justice Department&apos;s inspector general identifies four dozen instances in which demands for personal information -- known as National Security Letters -- may have violated laws and agency regulations. The report also found that the Bureau lied to Congress about its use of the letters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI has had limited authority to issue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt; for many years. However, a controversial provision of the PATRIOT Act greatly expanded the Bureau&apos;s ability to use them to gather information about anyone, as long as the agency believes the information could be relevant to a terrorism or espionage investigation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today&apos;s report follows the inspector general&apos;s findings last year that the Bureau had disclosed more than 100 instances of possible intelligence misconduct to the Intelligence Oversight Board in the preceding two years, a number of which were &quot;significant.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2005, EFF argued in a friend of the court brief that the FBI&apos;s &quot;unfettered authority&quot; to issue National Security Letters &quot;is ripe for abuse.&quot; The danger of such abuse has now been documented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is not simply about errors in &apos;oversight,&apos;&quot; said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien. &quot;This is about disregard for the law.  For example, FBI terrorism investigators ignored their own lawyers&apos; advice to stop using so-called &apos;exigent&apos; letters for about two years.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;read the full report from the Justice Department&lt;/a&gt;, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;this brief description of  National Security Letters &lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/10.html#a8744</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:52:46 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/10.html#a8741</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000215.html&quot;&gt;Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings. The release of a new report detailing massive FBI abusesof the PATRIOT Act (particularly in regard to National SecurityLetters), now confirms concerns that I and others have been longexpressing about the potential abuse of retained Internet and otherdata, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000175.html&quot;&gt;Sounding the Alarm on Government-Mandated Data Retention&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/google-privacy-initiative&quot;&gt;An Open Letter to Google:  Concepts for a Google Privacy Initiative&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Broad abuses of retained data are now demonstrated to be real, not theoretical, as described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902353.html&quot;&gt;this Washington Post story&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don&apos;t yet really know the full extent of these violations, butwhat has already been revealed is bad enough as a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that these events will not only trigger considerablesoul-searching by those firms who voluntarily retain user activitydata, but also cause a renewed recognition of how broad mandated dataretention can facilitate, and inevitably will facilitate, such abusesin the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Lauren--&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/&quot;&gt;Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/10.html#a8741</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:43:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://lauren.vortex.com/index.rdf">Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice: FBI misused Patriot Act powers - Yahoo! News</title>			<link>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE</link>			<description>The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday.&lt;p&gt;And for three years the FBI underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who oversees the FBI, described the problems cited in the report as unacceptable and left open the possibility of criminal charges. He ordered further investigation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&quot;Once we get that information, we&apos;ll be in a better position to assess what kinds of steps should be taken,&quot; Gonzales told reporters following a speech to privacy officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI also used so-called &quot;exigent letters,&quot; signed by officials atFBI headquarters who were not authorized to sign national securityletters, to obtain information. In at least 700 cases, these exigentletters were sent to three telephone companies to get toll billingrecords and subscriber information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;In many cases, there was no pending investigation associatedwith the request at the time the exigent letters were sent,&quot; the auditconcluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a letter to Fine, Gonzales asked the inspector general toissue a follow-up audit in July on whether the FBI had followedrecommendations to fix the problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;To say that I am concerned about what has been revealed inthis report would be an enormous understatement,&quot; Gonzales told theprivacy officials. &quot;Failure to adequately protect information privacysimply is a failure to do our jobs.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senators outraged over the conclusions signaled they would provide tougher oversight of the FBI -- and perhaps limit its power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The report indicates abuse of the authority&quot; Congress gave the FBI, said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Patrick%20Leahy%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=1174vafan/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=592&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11g49da8m/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=592&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Vt. &quot;You cannot have people act as free agents on something where they&apos;re going to be delving into your privacy.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The committee&apos;s top Republican, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Arlen%20Specter%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117p02ae7/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=497&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gg4hb20/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=497&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;),said the FBI appears to have &quot;badly misused national security letters.&quot;The senator said, &quot;This is, regrettably, part of an ongoing processwhere the federal authorities are not really sensitive to privacy andgo far beyond what we have authorized.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Russ Feingold (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Russ%20Feingold%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117l228rs/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=629&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gobi8e5/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=629&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Wis., another member on the panel that oversees the FBI, said the report &quot;proves that &apos;trust us&apos; doesn&apos;t cut it.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The American Civil Liberties Union said the audit proves Congress must amend the Patriot Act to require judicial approval anytime the FBI wants access to sensitive personal information. &quot;The Attorney General and the FBI are part of the problem and they cannot be trusted to be part of the solution,&quot; said Anthony D. Romero, the ACLU&apos;s executive director.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8738</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:34:53 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8737</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100579673/article.pl&quot;&gt;Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt;. happyslayer writes to mention that according to Yahoo! News a recent audit shows that the FBI has improperly and in some cases &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE&quot;&gt;illegally utilized the Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt; to obtain information. &quot;The audit by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine found that FBI agents sometimes demanded personal data on individuals without proper authorization. The 126-page audit also found the FBI improperly obtained telephone records in non-emergency circumstances. The audit blames agent error and shoddy record-keeping for the bulk of the problems and did not find any indication of criminal misconduct. Still, &apos;we believe the improper or illegal uses we found involve serious misuses of national security letter authorities,&apos; the audit concludes.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8737</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:27:43 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Local - &apos;Big brother&apos; surveillance makes waves in Sweden</title>			<link>http://www.thelocal.se/6619/20070307/</link>			<description>A far-reaching wiretapping programme proposed by Sweden&apos;s government todefend against foreign threats, including monitoring emails andtelephone calls, has stirred up a fiery debate in the past few weeks,with critics decrying the creation of a &quot;big brother&quot; state.&lt;br&gt;     &lt;br&gt;The new legislation, to be presented to parliament on Thursday, wouldenable the National Defence Radio Establishment (FRA) to tap allInternet and telephone communication in and out of Sweden.&lt;br&gt;   </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8735</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:21:39 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Sweden Admits Tapping Citizens&apos; Phones for Decades. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8734</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100567859/article.pl&quot;&gt;Sweden Admits Tapping Citizens&apos; Phones for Decades&lt;/a&gt;. 			paulraps writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Sweden is close to implementing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/6619/20070307/&quot;&gt;new surveillance legislation&lt;/a&gt;that will include the monitoring of emails, telephone calls and keywordsearches using advanced pattern analysis. The objective is to detect&apos;threats such as terrorism, IT attacks or the spread of weapons of massdestruction&apos; but the proposals have divided the country. In a misguidedattempt to put people at ease, the government admitted that Sweden hasbeen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/6645/20070309/&quot;&gt;tapping its citizens&apos; phones&lt;/a&gt; for decades anyway.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8734</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:18:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Blotter(ABC NEWS) - Exclusive: Report Says FBI Violated Patriot Act Guidelines</title>			<link>http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/exclusive_repor.html</link>			<description>The FBI repeatedly failed to follow the strict guidelines of thePatriot Act when its agents took advantage of a new provision allowingthe FBI to obtain phone and financial records without a court order,according to a report to be made public Friday by the JusticeDepartment&apos;s Inspector General.&lt;p&gt;The report, in classified and unclassified versions, remains closelyheld, but Washington officials who have seen it tell ABC News itdocuments &quot;numerous lapses&quot; and describe it as &quot;scathing&quot; and &quot;not apretty picture for the FBI.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FBI Director Robert Mueller is scheduled to brief Congress on the report at noon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The officials say the inspector general found the FBI underreportedby at least 20 percent the use of the controversial provision, known asNational Security Letters, NSLs, in required disclosures to Congress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Patriot Act gave FBI agents the ability to demand telephone,bank, credit card and library records by issuing an administrativeletter, bypassing the need to seek a warrant from a federal judge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8731</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:02:02 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Pine Bluff - Scaled-back version of drug database passes Senate</title>			<link>http://www.pbcommercial.com/articles/2007/03/09/ap-state-ar/d8noh5o82.txt</link>			<description>LITTLEROCK - Scaling back the scope of a statewide database to monitor someprescription drug purchases gained Senate approval of the measureThursday. The bill&apos;s sponsor said the amendments were intended toaddress concerns about patient privacy.          &lt;table align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;4&quot; width=&quot;&quot;&gt;            &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;              &lt;td&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;            &lt;/tr&gt;            &lt;tr&gt;              &lt;td class=&quot;cutline&quot; width=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;            &lt;/tr&gt;          &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;          &lt;p class=&quot;text12&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;[...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By a 20-7 vote, the Senate approveda bill by Sen. Denny Altes, R-Fort Smith, that would allow the stateBoard of Pharmacy to establish standards for setting up the database ondrug purchases. The database would track schedule II and schedule IIInarcotics, such as morphine or OxyContin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I think we&apos;ve amendedthis about six times now,&quot; Altes said before the vote. &quot;I think thesechanges should address all the concerns that were raised.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Altesoriginally called for a database to track virtually all prescriptiondrug purchases in the state. The measure passed by the Senate allowsthe Board of Pharmacy to set the criteria for the information to betracked by the database.&lt;/p&gt;          &lt;!-- AdSys ad not found for ap-state-ar:middle --&gt;          Sen.Jim Argue, D-Little Rock, said he still believed the database could besubject to abuse and could harm the privacy of some patients.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Thereis no evidence that a database like this works, but there is evidencethat databases like this could be violated,&quot; Argue said.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8730</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:33:58 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Malware with Rootkit Features Grows. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8728</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104324&amp;amp;ti=Malware+with+Rootkit+Features+Grows&quot;&gt;Malware with Rootkit Features Grows&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Rootkit techniques are becoming increasingly popular among malware creators.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8728</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:49 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security Tests Snoop Computer System. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8727</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100464513/article.pl&quot;&gt;Homeland Security Tests Snoop Computer System&lt;/a&gt;. Parallax Blue writes &quot;The Washington Times reports that Homeland Security has developed and is testing a new computer system called &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070308-124323-4382r.htm&quot;&gt;ADVISE (Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement)&lt;/a&gt; that collects and analyzes personal information on US citizens. Relevant data &apos;can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information.&apos; The program apparently uses the same process as the Pentagon&apos;s Total Information Awareness project, which was aborted in 2003 due to privacy concerns.&quot;&lt;p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8727</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:23:56 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Crash-Testing a Killer Bot. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8722</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/in_late_2004_th.html&quot;&gt;Crash-Testing a Killer Bot&lt;/a&gt;. Israel rolls out a tiny, Uzi-toting robot. But what happens when the armed equivalent of the Blue Screen of Death occurs? In Danger Room. In Danger Room. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8722</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:57:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Sweden: Monitor Communications.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8721</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SWEDEN_E_MAIL_SPYING?SITE=WIRE&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&quot;&gt;Sweden: Monitor Communications&lt;/a&gt;. A Swedish government security plan would allow a defense intelligence agency to monitor -- without a court order -- e-mail traffic and phone calls crossing the nation&apos;s borders. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/09.html#a8721</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:35:34 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security revives supersnoop - The Washington Times</title>			<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070308-124323-4382r.htm</link>			<description>Homeland Security officials are testing a supersnoop computer system that sifts through personal information on U.S. citizens to detect possible terrorist attacks, prompting concerns from lawmakers who have called for investigations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The system uses the same data-mining process that was developed by the Pentagon&apos;s Total Information Awareness (TIA) project that was banned by Congress in 2003 because of vast privacy violations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of the project called ADVISE -- Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement -- was requested by Rep. David R. Obey, Wisconsin Democrat and chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The investigation focuses on whether the program violates privacy laws, and the findings will be released after completion of the Iraq war supplemental spending bill, possibly as early as this week, a panel aide said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ADVISE and TIA data-mining projects rely on personal data to track individual behavior and consumer transactions to develop computer algorithms that create a pattern that some behavioral scientists say can predict terrorist behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Privacy concerns prompted lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to introduce legislation in January to require that government agencies disclose data-mining practices in regular reports to Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;A serious discussion on the implications of data-mining programs is long overdue,&quot; Sen. Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat and a sponsor of the bill, said yesterday. Sen. John E. Sununu, New Hampshire Republican, is also a bill sponsor.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8711</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:21:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>FCW.com News - Census Bureau accidentally exposes personal data</title>			<link>http://www.fcw.com/article97859-03-08-07-Web</link>			<description>&lt;span class=&quot;storybody&quot;&gt;The Census Bureau accidentally posted personalinformation on 302 households on a public server several times sinceOctober 2006, officials said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The personal information,including names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, family incomeranges and other demographic data, was contained in a file that wasplaced on a public server for the purposes of testing new softwareapplications. The file included about 250 fake accounts in addition tothe real information. The bureau found out about the mistake when itfound the file on the server in mid-February.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8708</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:04:50 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>heise Security - All Microsoft updates phone home</title>			<link>http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86429</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Possibly as a reaction to heise Security&apos;s report that Windows Genuine Advantage Notification sends back data to Redmond even when users choose to terminate its installation, a Microsoft developer using the pseudonym alexkoc has now posted an entry in the WGA blog. There he reveals that every update that flows through Windows Update at the very least informs Microsoft about whether the installation was successful or not. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://update.microsoft.com/windowsupdate/v6/privacy.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Privacy Statement&lt;/a&gt; of Windows Update Microsoft grants itself fairly far-reaching rights. Thus the information collected by the Redmond-based behemoth includes the computer make and model, version information for the operating system, browser, and any other Microsoft software for which updates might be available, Plug&amp;amp;Play ID numbers of hardware devices, region and language setting, Globally Unique Identifier (GUID), Product ID and Product Key, BIOS name, revision number, and revision date. By way of justifying Microsoft&apos;s approach, alexkoc writes that the EULA, likewise presented by the WGA installer, also covered the relaying of such information. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With some updates such as the WGA Notification, the installer transmits data that Microsoft says it merely requires for quality control purposes and to improve the installer itself. The WGA package thus, among other things, sends back an event code. To calm the fears of users, alexkoc presents a graphic explaining the various fields of such a data packet. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When the product IDs and product keys found belong to legal software, Microsoft will delete the data right away; only in cases of suspected software piracy will it store the data, the company has said. In the blog, the company once again explicitly states that it does not use the information gathered to identify or contact users. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8706</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:54:34 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>All Microsoft Updates Phone Home.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8705</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100320461/article.pl&quot;&gt;All Microsoft Updates Phone Home&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:ju@heisec.de&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;juct&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;In the wake of heise Security&apos;s report on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86294&quot;&gt;garrulous WGA Notification&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft has now supplied additional details on the data sent. They have revealed to developers that apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86429&quot;&gt;all updates relay information&lt;/a&gt; to the company in Redmond.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8705</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:49:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Vishing: Dialing for Dollars, Part II.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8703</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/vishing_dialing_for_dollars_pa_1.html&quot;&gt;Vishing: Dialing for Dollars, Part II&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Security Fix&lt;/strong&gt; received a copy of a new scam e-mail targeting &lt;strong&gt;Bank of America&lt;/strong&gt; customers that is likely to con quite a few folks before it is shut down. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, Bank of America is hit by this sort of thing all the time. It&apos;s the fourth most popular target for &quot;phishing&quot; scams that use e-mail to lure people into giving away their data at counterfeit sites, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phishtank.com/stats/2007/02/&quot;&gt;stats just released&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;PhishTank&lt;/strong&gt;. But this is one of the more convincing voice phishing or &quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishing&quot;&gt;vishing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; attacks I&apos;ve seen yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vishing scams start with an e-mail lure that asks the recipient to call a specific 1-800 number to settle some matter with his or her account. The numbers usually are connected to an automated system that asks the caller to key in data from a credit card -- the 16-digit account number, the expiration date and the three-digit security code on the back. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This new Bank of America scam has the same elements, but its execution is nearly flawless (unlike the majority of previous vishing scams Security Fix has seen, which either bungle the voice mail system or use a lure full of poor spelling and grammar). It informs the recipient that his account has been suspended because it was used to purchase &quot;obscene or certain sexually oriented goods or services.&quot; From the e-mail: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;We are hereby notifying you that, after a recent review of your account activity, it has been determined that you are in violation of Bank of America&apos;s Acceptable Use Policy. Therefore, your account has been temporarily limited for: hotjasmin.com cam shows. In order to remove the limit please call our TOLL FREE number [omitted].&quot;&lt;/em&gt; That domain is registered to a guy in the Netherlands, but it&apos;s currently inactive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recorded a short snippet of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/rec0308-081041.mp3&quot;&gt;first 45 seconds or so&lt;/a&gt; of the automated phone message used in this attack. If the you enter the requested information, the voice then asks for your bank PIN: &quot;Bank of America asks for your PIN in order to verify your identity. This also enables us to  assist federal authorities in order to prevent money laundering and other illegal activities.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Generally, it&apos;s a good idea not to even dial these bogus 1-800 numbers, as you&apos;re essentially giving the scammers your phone number, a key piece of your personal data. It&apos;s also a good idea to be very suspicious of e-mails that ask you to call any number. When in doubt, open up a browser Window and find the official Web site of your financial institution, then look up the customer-service number listed there. &lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8703</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:41:03 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>C-SPAN Unchains Congressional Hearing Videos.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8701</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005148.php&quot;&gt;C-SPAN Unchains Congressional Hearing Videos&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;C-SPAN has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cspan.org/about/press/release.asp?code=video&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that, effective immediately, its videos of Congressional hearings, White House briefings, and other federal events will be freely available for noncommercial copying, sharing and posting, so long as attribution is included (sounds like the Creative Commons &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/&quot;&gt;by-nc&lt;/a&gt; license, but no confirmation on whether that&apos;s what they are using). According to the C-SPAN press release, the move recognizes that we&apos;re in &quot;an age of explosive growth of video file sharers, bloggers and online citizen journalists.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is fantastic news! A considerable helping of the credit belongs to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Malamud&quot;&gt;Carl Malamud&lt;/a&gt;, who responded to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2007/03/01/dear_cspan_youre_not.html&quot;&gt;copyright kerfuffle&lt;/a&gt; involving House Speaker Nanci Pelosi&apos;s use of C-SPAN hearing footage by writing an &lt;a href=&quot;http://public.resource.org/dear_brian.html&quot;&gt;open letter&lt;/a&gt; to C-SPAN&apos;s CEO Brian Lamb challenging him to open up the archives to enable these kinds of public uses of C-SPAN content. Several meetings later, it appears C-SPAN decided to rise to the challenge. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kudos to Carl, and kudos to C-SPAN. This is an amazing bit of public service all around. (Full disclosure: EFF represented Carl in connection with this issue, but we hardly lifted a finger -- all credit goes to Carl.)&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Editor&lt;/span&gt;: Hmm maybe I&apos;ll have to consider making some snippets available in the future. A lot of hearings are dry, but every once in a while you get a real gem.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8701</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:56:27 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cuban gets stuck into YouTube, demands it squeals.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8698</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/08/cuban_copyright_whodunnit/&quot;&gt;Cuban gets stuck into YouTube, demands it squeals&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;&apos;Talk, morons&apos;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attention-seeking tech billionaire Mark Cuban has set the legal dogs on YouTube, demanding it snitch on users who uploaded video which one of his investments owns the rights to.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Music and Media&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/08.html#a8698</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:47:54 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/music_media/headlines.rss">The Register - Music and Media</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WGA Reports Back To MS Even If You Choose Not To Install - Aviran&apos;s Place</title>			<link>http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Heise online &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2F85884&amp;amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;on a very interesting action Microsoft is taking during the installation of WGA. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt;to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel theinstallation, the setup program will send your info and the fact thatyou choose not to install WGA back to their servers.&lt;/p&gt;In addition to that it seems that the setup program send someinformation stored in your registry to &lt;a href=&quot;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&lt;/a&gt;.While it does not specifically identify the user, it looks like it doessend some identification of your computer and Windows version (seepicture) to Microsoft servers.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8693</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:06:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8692</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100015015/article.pl&quot;&gt;Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No&lt;/a&gt;. Aviran writes &quot;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided NOT to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel the installation, the setup program &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/&quot;&gt;will send information stored in your registry&lt;/a&gt; and the fact that you choose not to install WGA back to Microsoft&apos;s servers.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8692</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Wal-Mart fires technician who recorded phone calls</title>			<link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012319</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;March 05, 2007 &amp;nbsp;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(Reuters)&lt;/a&gt;-- CHICAGO - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said today it fired a systemstechnician for intercepting text messages of people who were notWal-Mart employees and for recording telephone conversations with a &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; reporter without authorization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart, the world&apos;s largest retailer, said an internalinvestigation found the technician had monitored and recorded phonecalls between Wal-Mart public relations employees and a New York TimesCo. reporter between September and January.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer also said the technician, whoworked in its information systems division, intercepted and stored textmessages that contained certain key words, including those sent bypeople in the Bentonville area who were not Wal-Mart employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart spokeswoman Mona Williams said on a call with reporters that the technician &quot;did this on his own.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While interviews with the technician gave the retailer an idea as towhy he recorded the calls, Williams said she could not disclose thereasons because the case has been turned over to federal investigators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8684</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:52:20 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?  </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8683</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99782770/article.do&quot;&gt;Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Does the Wal-Mart eavesdropping debacle have the potential to be this year&apos;s HP scandal? A former IT security staffer for the retailer evaluates what might have happened. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8683</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:37 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Mass. motor vehicle registry warns of spoof site.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8682</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99789974/article.do&quot;&gt;Mass. motor vehicle registry warns of spoof site&lt;/a&gt;. The Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles is warning customers about an online scam intended to trick them out of their credit card information and their money.&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8682</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:44:41 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Crack! Security expert hacks RFID in UK passport.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8680</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99829740/article.do&quot;&gt;Crack! Security expert hacks RFID in UK passport&lt;/a&gt;. The British government says that forgery of their new biometric passports is inconceivable, but a security expert has demonstrated a successful crack of the embedded RFID chip and its info. And he did it without taking the document out of its mailing envelope. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/07.html#a8680</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:41:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Your Wi-Fi can tell people a lot about you | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;ARLINGTON, Va.--Simply booting up a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop can tellpeople sniffing wireless network traffic a lot about your computer--andabout you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Soon after a computer powers up, it starts looking for wirelessnetworks and network services. Even if the wireless hardware is thenshut-off, a snoop may already have caught interesting data. Much moreinformation can be &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Insecure+networks+could+lead+to+lawsuits/2009-1033_3-940460.html&quot; title=&quot;Insecure networks could lead to lawsuits -- Monday, Jul 1, 2002&quot;&gt;plucked out of the air&lt;/a&gt; if the computer is connected to an access point, in particular an access point without security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &quot;You&apos;re leaking all kinds of information that an attacker can use,&quot;David Maynor, chief technology officer at Errata Security, saidThursday in a presentation at the Black Hat DC event here. &quot;If thegovernment was taking this information from you, people would be up inarms. Yet you&apos;re leaking this voluntarily using your laptop at theairport.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; There are many tools that let anyone &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Wi-Fi+group+backs+brawnier+security+standard/2100-7351_3-5342824.html&quot; title=&quot;Wi-Fi group backs brawnier security standard -- Wednesday, Sep 1, 2004&quot;&gt;listen in on wireless network traffic&lt;/a&gt;.These tools can capture information such as usernames and passwords fore-mail accounts and instant message tools as well as data entered intounsecured Web sites. At the annual Defcon hacker gathering, a &quot;wall ofsheep&quot; always &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2300-1029_3-6102806-1.html&quot; title=&quot;Photos: Hacking at Defcon -- Monday, Aug 7, 2006&quot;&gt;lists captured log-in credentials&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Errata has developed another network sniffer that looks fortraffic using 25 protocols, including those for the popular instantmessage clients as well as DHCP, SNMP, DNS and HTTP. This means thesniffer will capture requests for network addresses, network managementtools, Web sites queries, Web traffic and more. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8678</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:20:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>A Network Sniffer On Steroids.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8677</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99790580/article.pl&quot;&gt;A Network Sniffer On Steroids&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QuantumCrypto&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Errata has developed &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html&quot;&gt;a new network sniffer&lt;/a&gt;,dubbed &apos;Ferret,&apos; that looks for traffic using 25 protocols, includingthose for the popular instant message clients as well as DHCP, SNMP,DNS and HTTP. This means the sniffer will capture requests for networkaddresses, network management tools, Web sites queries, Web traffic andmore. &apos;You don&apos;t realize how much you&apos;re making public, so I wrote atool that tells you,&apos; said Robert Graham, Errata&apos;s chief executive.Errata has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erratasec.com/ferret.html&quot;&gt;released the source code&lt;/a&gt;to this version 1.0, &apos;feature-poor and buggy&apos; tool on its site. Anyonewith a wireless card will be able to run it, Graham said.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8677</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:14:20 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty: What it Means to You</title>			<link>http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD</link>			<description>&lt;span id=&quot;intelliTXT&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that vein, in August the Senate ratified the Convention onCybercrime, drafted by the Council of Europe with considerable inputfrom the United States. So far, 43 nations have signed on. TheConvention includes many sensible provisions aimed at unifying globalcomputer-crime laws, and closes loopholes that make it possible forcriminals to escape prosecution by locating their activities offshore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But civil libertarians, along with leading telecommunicationscompanies, strongly oppose the treaty. Civil libertarians areespecially concerned about the sweeping authority given toparticipating countries to seize information from private parties asthey investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigatedisn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located. If France isinvestigating a sale of Nazi memorabilia on eBay, the U.S. mustcooperate, even though such transactions are not illegal in the U.S. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require membercountries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies fornetwork traffic, and require any operator of a computer network torespond to requests for information from any participating countrywithout compensation of any kind. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- Vignette V6 Tue Mar 06 11:46:26 2007 --&gt;&lt;!--WEB 6--&gt;&lt;!-- RELATED LINKS --&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are potentially serious problems, especially given that theConvention is open to any country that wants to join. But there aremore practical reasons U.S. businesses should be concerned. Theprovisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of acomputer network, not just telecoms. Worse, Article 12 attachesliability to businesses for &quot;lack of supervision or control&quot; ofemployees who commit criminal offenses covered by the Convention.Businesses must worry about employee activities that may be legal here,but illegal elsewhere, risking administrative, civil, or even criminalpenalties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These investigative and supervision costs will invariably beimposed on businesses without any real controls. Worldwidelaw-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves ofthe opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8674</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:53:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty &amp;#243; Hidden Costs For All.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8673</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99855559/article.pl&quot;&gt;Cybercrime Treaty [~] Hidden Costs For All&lt;/a&gt;. linuxtelephony writes in with an article at CIO Insight about a cybercrime treaty drafted in Europe with help from the US. It has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD&quot;&gt;implications for just about everyone with a network.&lt;/a&gt; From the article: &quot;Civil libertarians are especially concerned about the sweeping authority given to participating countries to seize information from private parties as they investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigated isn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located... Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require member countries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies for network traffic, and require any operator of a computer network to respond to requests for information from any participating country without compensation of any kind... The provisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of a computer network, not just telecoms... Worldwide law-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves of the opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8673</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:48:08 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Action Alert: Repeal the REAL ID Act!</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8671</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005145.php&quot;&gt;Action Alert: Repeal the REAL ID Act!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;p&gt;The federal government has taken another step towards forcing you to carry a national ID in order to get on airplanes, open a bank account, enter federal buildings, and much more. But with state legislatures and Congressional representatives increasingly turning against the REAL ID Act, you can help stop this costly, privacy-invasive mandate -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=275&quot;&gt;voice your opposition now.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On March 1, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nprm_realid.pdf&quot;&gt;draft regulations&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] for implementing REAL ID, which makes states standardize drivers licenses and create a vast national database linking all of the ID records together. Once in place, uses of the IDs and database will inevitably expand to facilitate a wide range of tracking and surveillance activities. Remember, the Social Security number started innocuously enough, but it has become a prerequisite for a host of government services and been co-opted by private companies to create massive databases of personal information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;REAL ID won&apos;t just cost you your privacy. The states and individual taxpayers bear the estimated 23 billion dollar burden of implementing the law, and that figure is probably low given that the necessary verification systems don&apos;t exist yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what will you get in return? Not improved national security, because IDs do little to stop those who haven&apos;t already been identified as threats, and wrongdoers will still be able to create fake documents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;REAL ID is fundamentally flawed, and DHS&apos; proposed regulations do nothing to change that. Thankfully, the tide is turning against REAL ID in a big way -- state legislatures around the country are passing or considering legislation rejecting its implementation, and Congress is considering repealing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The DHS regulations mean that states must have an implementation plan ready by October 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=275&quot;&gt;Make sure your Congressional representatives support the repeal of REAL ID before it&apos;s too late.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information, check out San Jose Mercury News&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/16843010.htm&quot;&gt;recent editorial opposing REAL ID&lt;/a&gt; as well as the ACLU&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realnightmare.org&quot;&gt;Realnightmare.org&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8671</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:24:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Anti-terror tests broke law, says watchdog - 03/01/07 - Tennessean.com</title>			<link>http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070301/NEWS08/703010393/1025/NEWS06</link>			<description>The Department of Homeland Security is testing a data-mining program that would attempt to spot terrorists by combing vast amounts of information about average Americans, such as flight and hotel reservations.&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The new program, similar to a Pentagon program that Congress killed in 2003 over concerns about civil liberties, could take effect as soon as next year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;But system testers probably already have violated privacy laws by reviewing real information, instead of fake data, a source familiar with a congressional investigation into the $42.5 million program told &lt;i&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The program, called Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE), is on the cutting edge of analytical technology that applies mathematical algorithms to uncover hidden relationships in data. The idea is to troll a vast sea of information and extract suspicious people, places and other elements based on their links and behavioral patterns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The privacy violation is described in a Government Accountability Office report due out soon. &quot;Undoubtedly there are likely to be more,&quot; GAO Comptroller David Walker said recently.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8665</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:13:09 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Apple Patches QuickTime Holes.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8664</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/apple_patches_quicktime_holes.html&quot;&gt;Apple Patches QuickTime Holes&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple&lt;/strong&gt; on Monday issued security patches to plug &lt;a href=&quot;https://webmail.wpni.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798&quot;&gt;multiple security holes&lt;/a&gt; in its &lt;strong&gt;QuickTime&lt;/strong&gt; media player software. The new version of the player -- QuickTime 7.1.5 -- fixes at least eight separate and serious vulnerabilities. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Updates are available for &lt;strong&gt;Mac OS X&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Windows 2000&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Windows XP&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/strong&gt; versions. Mac users can get the latest version either from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/mac.html&quot;&gt;Apple&apos;s site&lt;/a&gt; or via the built-in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/softwareupdates.html&quot;&gt;Software Update&lt;/a&gt; feature.  Windows users with recent versions of QuickTime installed will already have Apple&apos;s Software Update program and should use that to get this latest version.  Alternatively, Windows users can download it by following &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8664</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:04:12 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline - The NSA at AT&amp;T</title>			<link>http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/</link>			<description>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline is an episode on the NSA having a monitoring station in the AT&amp;amp;T wire room. They have the guy who originally broke the story being interviewed tonight.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/06.html#a8661</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:55:07 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Texas counties illegally posting Social Security numbers online, AG says.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/05.html#a8654</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99470220/article.do&quot;&gt;Texas counties illegally posting Social Security numbers online, AG says&lt;/a&gt;. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot has ruled that the posting of sensitive data online by county and district clerks is illegal. But the clerks are fighting back by pushing for a state law that would allow them to continue to do so. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/05.html#a8654</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:38:14 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>F2C: Freedom to Connect being webcast starting March 5</title>			<link>http://freedom-to-connect.net/index.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;F2C is a meeting of people engaged withInternet connectivity and all that it enables, including vendors,customers, regulators, legislators, analysts, financiers, citizens andco-creators. This year, the theme of F2C is how universal connectivityand the plunging capital requirements of information production arechanging our fundamental economic and social assumptions. (F2C isproduced by &lt;a href=&quot;http://isen.com/blog&quot;&gt;David S. Isenberg&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://isen.com&quot;&gt;isen.com, LLC&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;Tune into F2C &lt;a href=&quot;http://freedom-to-connect.net/chat.html&quot;&gt;Group Chat&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;									beginning about 8:30AM, Monday 5 March							&lt;p&gt;F2C &lt;a href=&quot;http://freedom-to-connect.net/stream.html&quot;&gt;Webcast&lt;/a&gt; available for those who can&apos;t be there. &amp;nbsp;									(Please participate in &lt;a href=&quot;http://freedom-to-connect.net/chat.html&quot;&gt;Group Chat&lt;/a&gt; too.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/05.html#a8653</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:57:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Pentagon Wants a &apos;TiVo&apos; to Watch You.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/04.html#a8650</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/99351007/article.pl&quot;&gt;The Pentagon Wants a &apos;TiVo&apos; to Watch You&lt;/a&gt;. An anonymous reader writes &quot;Danger Room, a Wired blog, today cites &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/the_pentagon_wa.html&quot;&gt;a study of future electronic snooping technologies &lt;/a&gt;from Reuters, written by the Pentagon&apos;s Defense Science Board. More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillance system that would put Big Brother to shame, and they&apos;re looking at the commercial sector to provide it. &apos;The ability to record terabyte and larger databases will provide an omnipresent knowledge of the present and the past that can be used to rewind battle space observations in TiVo-like fashion and to run recorded time backwards to help identify and locate even low-level enemy forces. For example, after a car bomb detonates, one would have the ability to play high-resolution data backward in time to follows the vehicle back to the source, and then use that knowledge to focus collection and gain additional information by organizing and searching through archived data.&apos;&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/04.html#a8650</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:31:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Month of PHP Bugs Has Begun.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/04.html#a8645</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/99016023/article.pl&quot;&gt;Month of PHP Bugs Has Begun&lt;/a&gt;. 			An anonymous reader writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/20/0144218&amp;amp;tid=169&quot;&gt;previously announced&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.php-security.org/&quot;&gt;Month of PHP Bugs&lt;/a&gt;started three days ago, and already lists 8 security vulnerabilities inPHP and PHP related software. From the site: &apos;This initiative is aneffort to improve the security of PHP. However we will not concentrateon problems in the PHP language that might result in insecure PHPapplications, but on security vulnerabilities in the PHP core. DuringMarch 2007 old and new security vulnerabilities in the Zend Engine, thePHP core and the PHP extensions will be disclosed on a day by daybasis. We will also point out necessary changes in the currentvulnerability management process used by the PHP Security ResponseTeam.&apos;&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/04.html#a8645</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:01:57 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Concurring Opinions: The Rise of Customer Blacklists</title>			<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/the_rise_of_cus.html</link>			<description>Blacklists appear to be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/12/the_gifts_you_c.html&quot;&gt;rage&lt;/a&gt;these days. With the ease of storing and sharing personal information-- coupled with lax privacy law restrictions on such activities --companies can increasingly create blacklists of bad customers. In this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8635fd6d-025d-4b18-a81b-d3859836fe61&quot;&gt;article from the Ottawa Citizen&lt;/a&gt;,hotels in Australia and Canada (and soon the United States) are signingup for a service that compiles a blacklist against &quot;bad&quot; hotel guests:</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8638</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:55:39 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Hartford Courant - Best Buy Confirms It Has Secret Website</title>			<link>http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-watchdog0302,0,5198012.column?coll=hc-utility-local</link>			<description>Under pressure from state investigators, Best Buy is now confirming myreporting that its stores have a secret intranet site that has beenused to block some consumers from getting cheaper prices advertised onBestBuy.com.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Company spokesman Justin Barber, who in early February denied theexistence of the internal website that could be accessed only byemployees, says his company is &quot;cooperating fully&quot; with the stateattorney general&apos;s investigation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Barber insists that the company never intended to mislead customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal ordered the investigationinto Best Buy&apos;s practices on Feb. 9 after my column disclosed thewebsite and showed how employees at two Connecticut stores used it todeny customers a $150 discount on a computer advertised on BestBuy.com.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blumenthal said Wednesday that Best Buy has also confirmed to hisoffice the existence of the intranet site, but has so far failed togive clear answers about its purpose and use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Their responses seem to raise as many questions as they answer,&quot;Blumenthal said in an interview. &quot;Their answers are less than crystalclear.&quot;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8632</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:26:10 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Canadian Gov&apos;t Grants Olympics Ownership of Winter.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8631</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/98845247/article.pl&quot;&gt;Canadian Gov&apos;t Grants Olympics Ownership of Winter&lt;/a&gt;. 			An anonymous reader writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Michael Geist reports that the Canadian government has introduced new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Docid=2764652&amp;amp;file=4&quot;&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt; that grants Vancouver Olympic organizers broad powers to police the use of any commercial &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1777/125/&quot;&gt;use of the words associated with the Olympics&lt;/a&gt;.These incredibly include &apos;winter, Vancouver, and games.&apos; As Geistnotes, the government &apos;has no time to deal with spam, spyware, privacy,or net neutrality, but commits to legislation on behalf of theorganizers of a sporting event?&apos;&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8631</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:17:34 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice Department takes aim at image-sharing sites | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6163679.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; The Bush administration has accelerated its Internet surveillancepush by proposing that Web sites must keep records of who uploadsphotographs or videos in case police determine the content is illegaland choose to investigate, CNET News.com has learned.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That proposal surfaced Wednesday in a private meeting during which U.S.Department of Justice officials, including Assistant Attorney GeneralRachel Brand, tried to convince industry representatives such as AOLand Comcast that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales pressures ISPs on data retention -- Friday, May 26, 2006&quot;&gt;data retention&lt;/a&gt;would be valuable in investigating terrorism, child pornography andother crimes. The discussions were described to News.com by severalpeople who attended the meeting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A second purpose of the meeting in Washington, D.C., according to thesources, was to ask Internet service providers how much it would costto record details on their subscribers for two years. At the veryleast, the companies would be required to keep logs for police of whichcustomer is assigned a specific Internet address.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only universities and libraries would be excluded, one participantsaid. &quot;There&apos;s a PR concern with including the libraries, so we&apos;re notgoing to include them,&quot; the participant quoted the Justice Departmentas saying. &quot;We know we&apos;re going to get a pushback, so we&apos;re not goingto do that.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+ISPs+must+keep+records+on+users/2100-1028_3-6117455.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales: ISPs must keep records on users -- Tuesday, Sep 19, 2006&quot;&gt;lobbying Congress&lt;/a&gt; for mandatory data retention, calling it a &quot;national problem that requires federal legislation.&quot; Gonzales has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales pressures ISPs on data retention -- Friday, May 26, 2006&quot;&gt;convened earlier private meetings&lt;/a&gt; to pressure industry representatives. And last month, Republicans introduced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/GOP+revives+ISP-tracking+legislation/2100-1028_3-6156948.html&quot; title=&quot;GOP revives ISP-tracking legislation -- Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007&quot;&gt;mandatory data retention bill&lt;/a&gt; in the U.S. House of Representatives that would &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00837:&quot;&gt;let the attorney general&lt;/a&gt; dictate what must be stored and for how long.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8630</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:12:46 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>DoJ Mulls Tracking Picture Uploads. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8629</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/98887304/article.pl&quot;&gt;DoJ Mulls Tracking Picture Uploads&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:hislordship@canada.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dominus Suus&lt;/a&gt;passed us a link to a C|Net article about a disturbing threat toprivacy from the Justice Department. According to the article, aprivate meeting was held Wednesday between Justice officials andtelecom industry representatives. With individuals from companies suchas AOL and Comcast looking on, the officials continued overtures toincrease data retention by ISPs on American citizens. This week, theywere specifically looking to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6163679.html&quot;&gt;records kept of photo uploads&lt;/a&gt;.In this way, and &apos;in case police determine the content is illegal andchoose to investigate,&apos; an easy trail from A to Z will be available.The article provides a good deal of background on the BushAdministration&apos;s history with data retention, with ties to events evenolder than the Bush presidency.&amp;nbsp; --- &quot;The Justice Department&apos;s requestfor information about compliance costs echoes a decade-ago debate overwiretapping digital telephones, which led to the 1994 CommunicationsAssistance for Law Enforcement Act. To reduce opposition by telephonecompanies, Congress set aside $500 million for reimbursement and thelegislation easily cleared both chambers by voice votes. Once Internetproviders come up with specific figures, privacy advocates worry,Congress will offer to write a generous check to cover all compliancecosts and the process will repeat itself.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/alerts/2007/03/03.html#a8629</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:57:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security offers details on Real ID | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+offers+details+on+Real+ID/2100-1028_3-6163509.html</link>			<description>Hundreds of millions of Americans will have until 2013 to beoutfitted with new digital ID cards, the Bush administration said onThursday in a long-awaited announcement that reveals details of how thenew identification plan will work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;p&gt;The an