<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.2.1 on Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:27:42 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Paul Hardwick: Biometrics</title>		<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/</link>		<description>Biometrics</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:27:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.2.1</generator>		<managingEditor>editor.radio (-at-) MacRonin.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>webmaster.radio(-at-) MacRonin.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>6</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>7</hour>			<hour>8</hour>			</skipHours>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>Administrivia: Possible unscheduled upgrade of Privacy Digest</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/17.html#a8870</link>			<description>Administrivia: Possible unscheduled upgrade of Privacy Digest. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might be implementing an unscheduled upgrade of the site due to some problems with the software I am currently using to run the site. I had been working on upgrading the software to implement some new features but may have to implement sooner than originally planned. If you would like to take a peek at the planned software take a visit to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/index.php&quot;&gt;http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/index.php&lt;/a&gt; Yes the full URL will have to be entered until I have completed the switch over. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There may be some hiccups during the process as the XML/RSS location will change along with access to the sub-topics. I plan to create mod-rewrite rules to take of this but they may not all be ready on day one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please let me know what you think. </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/17.html#a8870</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:39:04 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Biometrics, What and How. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/16.html#a8847</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infosecwriters.com/texts.php?op=display&amp;amp;id=546&quot;&gt;Biometrics, What and How&lt;/a&gt;. Moustafa Kamal submits this article that attempts to cover all of the characteristics that are used in Biometrics, how they areused, and what are the disadvantages of using them. By Moustafa Kamal. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infosecwriters.com/&quot;&gt;Infosec Writers Latest Security Papers&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/16.html#a8847</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:46:52 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.infosecwriters.com/isw.xml">Infosec Writers Latest Security Papers</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Don&apos;t like ID cards? Hand over your passport | the Daily Mail</title>			<link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;ito=newsnow</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody who objects to their personal details going on the new &quot;BigBrother&quot; ID cards database will be banned from having a passport.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James Hall, the official in charge of the supposedly-voluntaryscheme, said the Government would allow people to opt out - but inreturn they must &quot;forgo the ability&quot; to have a travel document.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With one in every eight people saying they will refuse tosign-up, up to five million adults could effectively be refusedpermission to leave the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Campaigners reacted to Mr Hall&apos;s remarks with fury, saying theywere yet more evidence of the lurch towards &quot;Big Brother&quot; Britain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Phil Booth, of the NO2ID group, said: &quot;The idea that ID cards scheme is voluntary, and people can opt-out, is a joke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;There are all sorts of reasons why people need to travel, not just for holidays. There is work, visiting relatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;What are these people supposed to do? It stretches thedefinition of voluntary beyond breaking point. They will go to anylength to get personal information for this huge database. Who knowswhat will happen to it then?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/11.html#a8750</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:56:16 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/11.html#a8749</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100791998/article.pl&quot;&gt;No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waronfreedom.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UpnAtom&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;People who refuse to give up their &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6370627.stm&quot;&gt;bank records&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristol-no2id.org.uk/blog/?page_id=5&quot;&gt;tax records &amp;amp; details of any benefits they&apos;ve claimed&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article334686.ece&quot;&gt;records of their car movements for the last year&lt;/a&gt;, or refuse to submit to an interrogation on whether they are the same person that this mountain of data belongs to -- will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;amp;ito=newsnow&quot;&gt;denied passports&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.no2id.net/viewtopic.php?t=14792&quot;&gt;March 26th&lt;/a&gt;.The Blair government has already admitted that this and other data willbe cross-linked so that the Home Office and other officials can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1993055,00.html&quot;&gt;spy on the everyday lives of innocent Britons&lt;/a&gt;. Britons were already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-545269&quot;&gt;the most spied upon nation in Western Europe&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/09/1823255&amp;amp;tid=158&quot;&gt;more so even than Sweden&lt;/a&gt;.Data-mining through this unprecedented level of mass-surveillanceallows any future British government to leapfrog even countries likeChina and North Korea.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/11.html#a8749</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:52:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security offers details on Real ID | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+offers+details+on+Real+ID/2100-1028_3-6163509.html</link>			<description>Hundreds of millions of Americans will have until 2013 to beoutfitted with new digital ID cards, the Bush administration said onThursday in a long-awaited announcement that reveals details of how thenew identification plan will work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;p&gt;The announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security offers afive-year extension to the deadline for states to issue the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+chief+defends+Real+ID+plan/2100-1028_3-6143862.html&quot; title=&quot;Homeland Security chief defends Real ID plan -- Thursday, Dec 14, 2006&quot;&gt;ID cards&lt;/a&gt;, and proposes creating the equivalent of a national database that would include details on all 240 million licensed drivers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nprm_realid.pdf&quot;&gt;draft regulations&lt;/a&gt;  (PDF), which were required by Congress in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/FAQ+How+Real+ID+will+affect+you/2100-1028_3-5697111.html&quot; title=&quot;FAQ: How Real ID will affect you -- Friday, May 6, 2005&quot;&gt;2005 Real ID Act&lt;/a&gt; and are unlikely to assuage &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Maine+rejects+Real+ID+Act/2100-7348_3-6153532.html&quot; title=&quot;Maine rejects Real ID Act -- Thursday, Jan 25, 2007&quot;&gt;privacy and cost concerns&lt;/a&gt; raised by state legislatures:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;acirc;o&amp;#162; The Real ID cards must include all drivers&apos; home addresses and otherpersonal information printed on the front and in a two-dimensionalbarcode on the back. The barcode will not be encrypted because of&quot;operational complexity,&quot; which means that businesses like bars andbanks that require ID would be capable of scanning and recordingcustomers&apos; home addresses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;acirc;o&amp;#162; A radio frequency identification (RFID) tag is underconsideration. Homeland Security is asking for input on how thelicenses could incorporate &quot;RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, inaddition to&quot; the two-dimensional barcode requirement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/03/03.html#a8628</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:52:36 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Administrivia:  Now we have a overheated CPU ( 60 degrees centigrade )</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/27.html#a8574</link>			<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;OK, if the DDOS attack wasn&apos;t enough. Now our server went down with a temperature overload. We were up to 60 degrees centigrade when we shut down. The CPU and a broken fan have been replaced.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/27.html#a8574</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:39:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Administrivia: Our data-center was hit by a DDOS attack today.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/27.html#a8573</link>			<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Sorry for being either very slow or off the net for a while recently. The data-center we are part of was hit by a DDOS (Distributed Denial Of Service) attack &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;recently&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;. At the moment it looks to be under control, but we are keeping an eye on things.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/27.html#a8573</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:19:59 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>DHS Biometric Program in Trouble. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/26.html#a8558</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/96134289/0,72792-0.html&quot;&gt;DHS Biometric Program in Trouble&lt;/a&gt;. Spiraling costs and a missing long-term strategy bedevil the US-VISIT program, which screens incoming travelers to the United States for terrorist links. Luke O&apos;Brien reports from Washington. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/26.html#a8558</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Smart Cards Key to Information and Identity Security, Says Gates, Others. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/13.html#a8421</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=103906&amp;amp;ti=Smart+Cards+Key+to+Information+and+Identity+Security%2C+Says+Gates%2C+Others&quot;&gt;Smart Cards Key to Information and Identity Security, Says Gates, Others&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;We need to secure the king instead of the castle. Information is king and it likes to move around.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/13.html#a8421</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:43:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>China Creates Massive Online ID Database.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/11.html#a8388</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/89094756/article.pl&quot;&gt;China Creates Massive Online ID Database&lt;/a&gt;. 			schwaang writes that while the US continues to hash out concerns over the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/Privacy/ID/RealID/&quot;&gt;Real ID Act&lt;/a&gt;, which aims to create a national ID by standardizing state driver&apos;s licenses, China has already implemented a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-02/09/content_5720728.htm&quot;&gt;massive online ID database&lt;/a&gt;, which they say will help prevent fraud.&amp;nbsp; --- From the Xinhua English-language site:&amp;nbsp; &quot;Anyonecan now send a text message or visit the country&apos;s populationinformation center&apos;s website, to check if the name and the ID number ofa person&apos;s identity card match. If they do match the ID card-holder&apos;spicture also appears, said the Ministry, adding that no otherinformation is available to ensure a citizen&apos;s privacy is protected.Completed at the end of 2006, China&apos;s population information database,the world&apos;s largest, contains personal information on 1.3 billioncitizens. Giving public accessing to the database is also designed tocorrect mistakes if an individual discovers that their name, number andpicture don&apos;t match.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/11.html#a8388</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:48:50 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>MS Seeks Patent For Repossessing School Computers.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/11.html#a8386</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/89189614/article.pl&quot;&gt;MS Seeks Patent For Repossessing School Computers&lt;/a&gt;. theodp writes &quot;Microsoft has applied for a patent for &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;d=PG01&amp;amp;p=1&amp;amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;amp;r=1&amp;amp;f=G&amp;amp;l=50&amp;amp;s1=%2220070033102%22.PGNR.&amp;amp;OS=DN/20070033102&amp;amp;RS=DN/20070033102&quot;&gt;securely providing advertising subsidized computer usage&lt;/a&gt;.&apos; The application describes how face-recognition webcams and CAPTCHAs can be used in schools to ensure that computer users are paying attention to ads, and the recourse of &apos;disabling or even repossessing the computer&apos; if they are not.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/11.html#a8386</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:40:04 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>LiveScience.com - Stealthy Iris Scanner in the Works</title>			<link>http://www.livescience.com/scienceoffiction/070206_technovelgy.html</link>			<description>&amp;gt;A public iris scanning device has been proposed in a patent from Samoff Labs in New Jersey. The device is able to scan the iris of the eye without the knowledge or consent of the person being scanned. The device uses multiple cameras, and then combines images to create a single scan (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=930&quot;&gt;diagram&lt;/a&gt;).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p&gt;Iris recognition is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Technology-Article.asp?ArtNum=12&quot;&gt;biometric identification system&lt;/a&gt; that requires a high-resolution picture of the irides of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/051128_eye_works.html&quot;&gt;subject&apos;s eye&lt;/a&gt;. Pattern recognition software is then used to match that picture against future &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Technology-Article.asp?ArtNum=64&quot;&gt;iris scans&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Iris scans are considered highly accurate; current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Technology-Article.asp?ArtNum=65&quot;&gt;iris recognition algorithms&lt;/a&gt; have an incredibly low false match rate. Good quality scans result in a &quot;false match&quot; less than one time per one hundred billion (this system has been used with excellent results in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/php/multimedia/imagegallery/igviewer.php?imgid=286&amp;amp;gid=21&quot;&gt;United Arab Emirates&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/09.html#a8365</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:47:34 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Public Iris Scanning Device In the Works. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/09.html#a8364</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/87651076/article.pl&quot;&gt;Public Iris Scanning Device In the Works&lt;/a&gt;. 			Nonfinity writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/scienceoffiction/070206_technovelgy.html&quot;&gt;public iris scanning device&lt;/a&gt; has been proposed in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;d=PG01&amp;amp;p=1&amp;amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;amp;r=1&amp;amp;f=G&amp;amp;l=50&amp;amp;s1=%2220060274919%22.PGNR.&amp;amp;OS=DN/20060274919&amp;amp;RS=DN/20060274919&quot;&gt;patent application&lt;/a&gt;from Sarnoff Labs in New Jersey. The device is able to scan the iris ofthe eye without the knowledge or consent of the person being scanned.The device uses multiple cameras, captures multiple images, and thenselects the best image to process.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/02/09.html#a8364</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:42:13 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Maine rejects Real ID Act | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Maine+rejects+Real+ID/2100-7348_3-6153532.html</link>			<description>&lt;b&gt;Maine overwhelmingly rejected federal requirements for nationalidentification cards on Thursday, marking the first formal stateopposition to controversial legislation scheduled to go in effect forAmericans next year.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both chambers of the Maine legislature approved a resolution saying thestate flatly &quot;refuses&quot; to force its citizens to use driver&apos;s licensesthat comply with digital ID standards, which were established under the2005 &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/FAQ+How+Real+ID+will+affect+you/2100-1028_3-5697111.html&quot; title=&quot;FAQ: How Real ID will affect you -- Friday, May 6, 2005&quot;&gt;Real ID Act&lt;/a&gt;. It asks the U.S. Congress to repeal the law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The vote represents a political setback for the U.S. Department ofHomeland Security and Republicans in Washington, D.C., which haveargued that nationalized ID cards for all Americans would help in thefight against terrorists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;I have faith that the Democrats in Congress will hear this frommany states and will find a way to repeal or amend this in the comingmonths,&quot; House Majority Leader &lt;a href=&quot;http://pingree.com&quot;&gt;Hannah Pingree&lt;/a&gt;,a Democrat, said in a telephone interview after the vote. &quot;It&apos;s notonly a huge federal mandate, but it&apos;s a huge mandate from the federalgovernment asking us to do something we don&apos;t have any interest indoing.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Real ID Act says that, starting around May 2008, Americans willneed a federally approved ID card--a U.S. passport will alsoqualify--to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect SocialSecurity payments or take advantage of nearly any government service.States will have to conduct checks of their citizens&apos; identificationpapers, and driver&apos;s licenses likely will be reissued to comply withHomeland Security requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/27.html#a8219</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:20:03 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>New Scanners for Tracking City Workers - New York Times</title>			<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/nyregion/23scanning.html?ex=1327208400&amp;en=7312efab98bd4f81&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss</link>			<description>The Bloomberg administration is devoting more than $180 million toward state-of-the-art technology to keep track of when city employees come and go, with one agency requiring its workers to scan their hands each time they enter and leave the workplace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The scanning, which began in August at the Department of Design and Construction, has created an uproar at a generally quiet department that focuses on major city construction projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At a City Council hearing yesterday, several unions vowed to resist the growing use of biometrics -- the unique identifying qualities associated with faces, fingers, hands, eyes and other body parts. The unions called the use of biometrics degrading, intrusive and unnecessary and said experimenting with the technology could set the stage for wider use of biometrics to keep tabs on all elements of the workday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The use of new tracking technologies has been contentious at more and more workplaces. At Wyckoff Heights Medical Center in Brooklyn, nurses carry radio-frequency identification tags that allow their movements to be tracked, a practice the nurses protested in an arbitration proceeding. A lawyer for the hospital, David N. Hoffman, said the system was used to ensure the quality of patient care and not to keep track of nurses who are on breaks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The town of Babylon, N.Y., installed global positioning system technology last year in most of its 250 vehicles, including snow plows and dump trucks; drivers complained that the system intruded on their privacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Identification devices are at the frontier of debates over workplace privacy, supplanting more traditional concerns like the use of drug tests and polygraphs, said Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a research and advocacy organization in Washington. &quot;New technologies raise questions about the control over disclosure of personal information,&quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt; &quot;Are these hand scanners the wave of the future,&quot; asked CouncilmanJoseph P. Addabbo Jr. of Queens, who conducted the hearing as chairmanof the Civil Service and Labor Committee, &quot;or are they unnecessary,costly and a detriment to worker morale and productivity?&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thescanners were introduced in August at the department&apos;s headquarters inLong Island City, Queens. Hundreds of workers who keep daily timesheets-- generally, those who make less than $66,000 a year -- must use thescanners; those who file weekly timesheets, including many managers andsupervisors, are exempt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cecelia McCarthy, an official in the Organization of Staff Analysts,another union representing employees at the department, said one workercomplained after a colleague with an injured hand was asked to remove abandage and place the hand -- with an open finger wound -- on themachine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/26.html#a8190</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:07:43 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>WCSH6.com - Maine Lawmakers Take Stand Against Real ID Act</title>			<link>http://www.wcsh6.com/news/search/article.aspx?storyid=50832</link>			<description>The Maine House and Senate registered nearly unanimous opposition Thursday to the federal Real ID Act, which requires states to change their drivers&apos; licenses into national IDs linked to a central database.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Supporters of the nonbinding resolution say the program would cost Maine taxpayers $185 million, while compromising their privacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The national I.D. card would be one key opening up a porthole that everything you hold precious and private. That&apos;s the problem,&quot; said Senator Libby Mitchell from Augusta.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Opponents also say Real ID would turn state Bureau of Motor Vehicle clerks into de facto federal Immigration and Naturalization Service agents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The resolution is not binding on Congress, but says the Legislature refuses to implement the Real ID Act. It asks Congress to repeal the law.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/26.html#a8189</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:58:54 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>UK to review school fingerprinting.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/16.html#a8091</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/12/kiddyprint_review/&quot;&gt;UK to review school fingerprinting&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Leave them kids alone, as they say&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Department for Education and Skills is to reconsider the fingerprinting of school children after a four year campaign by parents. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Music and Media&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/16.html#a8091</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:35:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/music_media/headlines.rss">The Register - Music and Media</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>UK airport iris biometric system flunks its exams.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/11.html#a8038</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/11/project_iris_evaluation_report/&quot;&gt;UK airport iris biometric system flunks its exams&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Buried evaluation reveals awful truth&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;An evaluation of the Home Office scheme to operate border controls via iris recognition &quot;pretty much fails&quot; Project Iris, according to Tory MP Ben Wallace. Wallace has been doggedly pursuing the results of the evaluation since autumn 2005, and these were quietly placed in the House of Commons library in late December. They reveal, according to Wallace, that Project Iris &quot;failed half its assessments.&quot;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/11.html#a8038</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:57:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Bush Era Draws to a Close. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/10.html#a8032</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/64057314/0,72330-0.html&quot;&gt;The Bush Era Draws to a Close&lt;/a&gt;. From warrantless surveillance to torture, the ugliest aspects of the &quot;War on Terror&quot; ended 2006 teetering on the brink of reform and renunciation. Commentary by Jennifer Granick. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/10.html#a8032</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:51:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Truste survey finds support for government use of biometric IDs.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/10.html#a8029</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/73264048/article.do&quot;&gt;Truste survey finds support for government use of biometric IDs&lt;/a&gt;. Despite privacy concerns, most Americans feel that biometric identity credentials will shore up national and financial security. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Editor&lt;/span&gt;: Not the people I know.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/10.html#a8029</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:40:25 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Study Says Americans Support Adding Biometrics to Government-Issued Identification - Jan 10, 2007</title>			<link>http://www.govtech.net/news/news.php?id=103224</link>			<description> Eighty-two percent of Americans support the use of biometric identification on passports, according to a recent survey conducted by Truste, a privacy certification and seal program, and market information group TNS. Three-quarters of Americans support the addition of biometric information to driver&apos;s licenses and nearly as many (72.6 percent) support adding it to Social Security cards, said the study sponsors in a release. More than half (52 percent) of respondents agreed with the statement that &quot;it will make it much harder for terrorists to operate within the U.S. with the use of biometrics to establish the identity of Americans.&quot; Conducted in September 2006, the survey indicates that Americans are willing to forego some personal privacy and anticipate misuse of the information in exchange for security. </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/10.html#a8028</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:38:07 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Government drops iris scan plan.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/09.html#a7998</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/09/government_drops_iris_scans_for_id_cards/&quot;&gt;Government drops iris scan plan&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Fingerprints only&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;Iris scans will not form part of the UK Government&apos;s planned identity card system the National Identity Register (NIR). The only biometric information to be held on ID cards will now be fingerprints, in contrast to previously stated plans.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/09.html#a7998</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:41:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Britons to be scanned for FBI database | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited</title>			<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/humanrights/story/0,,1984650,00.html</link>			<description>Millions of Britons who visit the United States are to have theirfingerprints stored on the FBI database alongside those of criminals,in a move that has outraged civil rights groups.&lt;p&gt;The Observer hasestablished that under new plans to combat terrorism, the US governmentwill demand that visitors have all 10 fingers scanned when they enterthe country. The information will be shared with intelligence agencies,including the FBI, with no restrictions on their international use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- This site/section combo is not set up to show MPU&apos;s --&gt;USairport scanners now take only two fingerprints from travellers. Themove to 10 allows the information to be compatible with the FBIdatabase.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&apos;We are going to start testing at several airports,&apos; aDepartment of Homeland Security spokeswoman confirmed. &apos;It will beginsome time this summer.&apos;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sources said 10 airports would initiallybe involved. The scheme will cover most of the major airportsfrequently used by British travellers, including New York, Washingtonand Miami. Countries subject to the new scheme include Britain, otherEuropean Union nations, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastnight the British civil rights group Liberty expressed astonishment atthe plan, which will affect four million British travellers to the US.&apos;This must be the Keystone Cops school of border control,&apos; said ShamiChakrabarti, director of Liberty. &apos;Accumulating the fingerprints ofmillions of innocent passengers will not deter would-be suicidebombers.&apos;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/08.html#a7991</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:46:38 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>US Visitor Fingerprints To Be (Perhaps) Stored by FBI. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/08.html#a7990</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/72459055/article.pl&quot;&gt;US Visitor Fingerprints To Be (Perhaps) Stored by FBI&lt;/a&gt;. stair69 writes &quot;Since 2004 many visitors to the United States have had 2 fingerprints taken under the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-VISIT&quot;&gt;US-VISIT&lt;/a&gt; scheme. Now there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/humanrights/story/0,,1984650,00.html&quot;&gt;new plans&lt;/a&gt; to extend this scheme [~] under the proposal all 10 fingerprints will be taken, and they will be stored permanently on the FBI&apos;s criminal fingerprint database. The fingerprints will also be made available to police forces in other countries. The scheme is due to be introduced by the end of 2008, but it will be trialled in 10 of the bigger airports initially.&quot; Of course, it is worth pointing out that given the recent change in Congress, I suspect that a number of countries will get a &quot;bye&quot; on this round, [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/08.html#a7990</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:44:24 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Face Recognition for Online Photo Searches Sparks Privacy Fears</title>			<link>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070105-photo-search.html</link>			<description>A new type of search engine using facial recognition technology could soon be able to pinpoint images of a person among the billions of photos posted online--even if their name does not appear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Swedish company named Polar Rose plans to launch its service for facial searches tied to the photo-sharing site Flickr within a couple weeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the next few months the firm hopes to expand the service to search images across the entire Web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The technology promises enhanced photo finding that would make it easier to find people on the Internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But privacy advocates are concerned that Polar Rose and similar facial-mapping search engines will violate people&apos;s rights and potentially aid criminals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lee Tien is an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Internet watchdog group that focuses on privacy and civil liberties.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Photos [posted online] are effectively anonymous now,&quot; Tien said, unless they are labeled with some sort if identifying text. &quot;But if Polar Rose works the way they say it will, that&apos;s all going to change.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tien said that this kind of technology could aid stalkers in tracking down their victims, or it could allow employers, insurance companies, and the government to pry into people&apos;s lives more than some of us would like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Editor&lt;/span&gt;: The situation is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/groups/central/discuss/72157594462167406/#comment72157594462305092&quot;&gt;currently being discused&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt; in a public discussion area over at Flickr itself. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/stewart/&quot;&gt;Stewart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt; who works for Flickr and is one of the original big wigs commented early today in the thread. He said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;margin-left: 40px;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;As far as I know they&apos;ve never been in touch with us (I&apos;ll ask aroundinternally). Judging from the screenshot, it looks like an explicitopt-in feature (which makes sense if they need people to identify thefaces in the photos). If it&apos;s not opt-in, we&apos;ll have a look at how itworks and see how people feel and do the right thing :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Unfortunately from looking at many of tghe other user comments, many people still don&apos;t get it. Probably because they don&apos;t understand the linking together of data from many variuos sources/databases. Many seem to think that if its not all in one monolithic database, its not connected.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2007/01/06.html#a7982</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:34:51 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Computers, Freedom and Privacy - Montreal, May 1-4 2007</title>			<link>http://www.cfp2007.org/live/</link>			<description> Come to CFP2007 in Montreal, May 1-4 2007. There&apos;s a lot at stake. </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7940</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:41:06 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Computers, Freedom and Privacy 2007 - Call For Proposals</title>			<link>http://www.cfp2007.org/live/</link>			<description>&lt;span class=&quot;callout_title&quot;&gt;Call For Proposals&lt;/span&gt; - The deadline for proposals is &lt;span class=&quot;style1&quot;&gt;January  20, 2006&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Program Committee of the Seventeenth Conference on Computers,Freedom, and Privacy (CFP2007) seeks your proposals for innovativeconference sessions and speakers. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7939</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:37:58 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Polar Rose - We sort the web of photos!</title>			<link>http://www.polarrose.com/</link>			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;text&quot;&gt;Polar Rose relies on a combination of our unique face recognition algorithms and the collective intelligence of our users.&lt;/p&gt;					&lt;p class=&quot;text&quot;&gt;Theface recognition technology used was originally developed by CTO JanErik Solem during his M.Sc and Ph.D. stints at the universities of Lundand Malm&amp;Atilde;&amp;#182; in southern Sweden. It&apos;s unique in that we are able toextract 3D information from regular 2D images, an approach thatradically improves the short-comings of existing face recognitionapproaches.&lt;/p&gt;					&lt;p class=&quot;text&quot;&gt;However, we don&apos;t and can&apos;t relyexclusively on face recognition, but also harness the collectiveintelligence of our users who help train our software and tag names onpeople we haven&apos;t seen before.&lt;/p&gt;					</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7928</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:07:50 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Face-hunting software will scour web for targets - 19 December 2006 - New Scientist Tech</title>			<link>http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn10828-facehunting-software-will-scour-web-for-targets.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;A search engine that uses sophisticated facial recognition to allowusers to identify and find people in online images will launch nextmonth. But civil liberties groups say the biometric-style tool couldcompromise the privacy of anyone who has their picture online.&lt;/p&gt;						&lt;p&gt;Searchengine Polar Rose reconstructs the 3D shape of a person&apos;s face and thencombines that with characteristics of their features to generate aunique &quot;face print&quot;. This can then be used to search other photos for amatch.&lt;/p&gt;						&lt;p&gt;In January users will be able to download aplugin for their browser that allows users to enter information aboutfaces they recognise in online images. This data is then sent to acentral server allowing anyone looking at an image containing thatparticular face print to tell who it is. Users can also search the webfor more photos containing that face.&lt;/p&gt;						&lt;p&gt;Online imagesearch engines usually work much like their text counterparts. &quot;Theyfind images on pages that contain the words you search for,&quot; says JanErik Solem, whose PhD project at Malm&amp;Atilde;&amp;#182; University College, Sweden, ledto the new company. &quot;Search engines are blind to images, Polar Rose isnot.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;					</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7927</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:03:21 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Polar Rose: More Amateur Facial Recognition.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7926</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/12/23/polar-rose-more-amateur-facial-recognition/&quot;&gt;Polar Rose: More Amateur Facial Recognition&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;p&gt;Another facial recognition search engine product has launched - &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.polarrose.com/&quot;&gt;Polar Rose&lt;/a&gt;. This &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn10828-facehunting-software-will-scour-web-for-targets.html&quot;&gt;New Scientist Tech article&lt;/a&gt; notes some of the privacy concerns:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Polar Rose and future developments that make facialrecognition available to the masses risk encroaching on people&apos;sprivacy, warns Yaman Akdeniz, director of the UK non-profit groupCyber-Rights &amp;amp; Cyber-Liberties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although this sounds like a great idea, I would not like to besearchable in this way, or so easily tracked without my consent,&quot; saysAkdeniz. The database compiled by Polar Rose is similar to the kind ofbiometric database some governments wish to use, he points out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;I wonder whether they have a right to build such a database,&quot; saysAkdeniz, he suggests people think twice before embracing suchpotentially intrusive tools, and consider which photos of themselvesthey allow online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Others agree. Simon Davies, director of the campaign group PrivacyInternational and a specialist in technology and privacy at the LondonSchool of Economics, UK, says face-searching technology is valuable butmust be used responsibly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He fears Polar Rose could help identity thieves or stalkers, or evenbe used by the police to monitor protesters. &quot;They could use theservice to find where people have been, what their activities are, orwho they associate with,&quot; he says.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Search engines should allow users to prevent their photos beingsearched, says Davies. &quot;There should be a way to put code in a webpagethat signals you want to opt out,&quot; he told New Scientist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t have time to add much more, but I&apos;ve blogged about theprivacy and surveillance concerns with widespread adoption of facialrecognition search engines &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/06/16/riya-moves-ahead-with-web-image-search/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/03/22/riya-facial-recognition-for-the-masses/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/03/14/commercial-data-aggregationof-my-image/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[via &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.pogowasright.org/article.php?story=20061219215857856&quot;&gt;Pogo Was Right&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/28.html#a7926</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:59:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Akaka-Sununu Bill Corrects Many Bad Aspects of Real ID Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/21.html#a7905</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005048.php&quot;&gt;Akaka-Sununu Bill Corrects Many Bad Aspects of Real ID Act&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;In 2005, Congress hastily passed legislation that rolled back privacy rights and moved the country towards a national ID system. The REAL ID Act states that drivers&apos; licenses will only be accepted for &quot;federal purposes&quot;[~]like accessing planes, trains, national parks, and court houses[~]if they conform to certain uniform standards. The law also requires a vast national database linking all of the ID records together. Estimated costs of $12 billion or more will be passed on to the states and, ultimately, average citizens in the form of increased DMV fees or taxes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thankfully, new bipartisan legislation could correct some of REAL ID&apos;s many flaws and add critical privacy and civil liberties safeguards. With the &quot;Identification Security Enhancement Act of 2006,&quot; Senators Daniel Akaka (D-HI) and John Sununu (R-NH) would cancel most of the standardization that might have led to a national ID card, call for more flexible standards, require encryption of the data itself, and prohibit the use of ID data by third parties. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information on the problems with the Real ID Act of 2005, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realnightmare.org&quot;&gt;www.realnightmare.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/21.html#a7905</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:44:57 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>BBC NEWS | Programmes | Click | ePassports &apos;at risk&apos; from cloning</title>			<link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/6182207.stm</link>			<description>So when Lukas Grunwald and Christian Bottger realised they could clone the new ePassport they were pretty sure it would be identical to the original, and undetectable. So how did they do it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The chip inside the ePassport is a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip of the type poised to replace the barcode in supermarkets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new British biometric European Union passport, which is embedded with a microchip&lt;br&gt;The &apos;enhanced&apos; security features of ePassports are being questioned&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The good thing about RFID chips is that they emit radio signals that can be read at a short distance by an electronic reader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this is also the bad thing about them because, as Lukas demonstrated to me, he can easily download the data from his passport using an RFID reader he got for 200 Euros on eBay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lukas is less forthcoming about where he got what is called the Golden Reader Tool, it is the software used by border police and it allows him to read the chip on his ePassport, including the photo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now for the clever bit. Thanks to a software he himself has developed, called RFdump, he downloads the passport&apos;s data onto his computer and then onto a blank chip.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using a standard off-the-shelf component you can just buy at a component store you can have a cloned ePassport in less than five minutes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/18.html#a7871</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:03:48 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>E-Passport Cloned In Five Minutes.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/18.html#a7870</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/63014901/article.pl&quot;&gt;E-Passport Cloned In Five Minutes&lt;/a&gt;. 			Last month a panel of EU experts warned that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/09/1757202&amp;amp;tid=172&quot;&gt;e-Passport&apos;s security is &quot;poorly conceived&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and in fact a week later a British newspaper &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/17/065214&quot;&gt;demonstrated a crack&lt;/a&gt;. Now another researcher has shown how to&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/6182207.stm&quot;&gt;clone a European e-Passport in under 5 minutes&lt;/a&gt;.A UK Home Office spokesman dismissed it all, saying &quot;It is hard to seewhy anyone would want to access the information on the chip.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/18.html#a7870</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:00:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/14.html#a7859</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/956&quot;&gt;Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law&lt;/a&gt;. A pair of Senators last week proposed legislation to repeal a controversial law mandating the creation of a national identification card. Senators Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) and John Sununu (R-N.H.) proposed the bill on the last day before the 109th Congress adjourned for good, but are likely to reintroduce it in 2007. The Real ID Act -- approved in 2005 without hearings or debate -- was intended to standardize state drivers&apos; licenses and create a national network of databases of personal information. Since then, it has become increasingly apparent that REAL ID is so fraught with privacy and security concerns that it requires fundamental reevaluation. CDT supports the bill and urges Sens. Akaka and Sununu to reintroduce it in the 110th Congress. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/14.html#a7859</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:12:10 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>FCW.com - GPO makes millionth e-passport</title>			<link>http://www.fcw.com/article97075-12-11-06-Web</link>			<description>&lt;span class=&quot;storybody&quot;&gt;The Government Printing Office reached a landmark this week when it produced its millionth electronic passport.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Atthe beginning of the year, GPO began producing the passports for theState Department, which then personalizes the blank documents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Weare very proud to reach this milestone,&quot; said Ben Brink, assistantpublic printer for security and intelligent documents. &quot;In thepost-[Sept. 11] era, many documents require new levels of security,from their creation to the distribution.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The passports containcontroversial radio frequency identification tags that contain adocument holder&apos;s personal information and can be scanned remotely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Atthe Black Hat conference in early August, a German researcherdemonstrated how a remote RFID reader could be used to clone apassport. Members of the Smart Card Alliance industry group said thatthe multiple security layers in the American e-passport can reduce suchrisks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/11.html#a7837</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:44:04 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>UK plans &apos;real-time&apos; no-fly lists plus fingerprint ID for air travel.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/08.html#a7805</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/08/uk_biometric_air_travel/&quot;&gt;UK plans &apos;real-time&apos; no-fly lists plus fingerprint ID for air travel&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;&apos;No finger, no fly&apos; to commence at Heathrow&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;As has been illustrated all too frequently in the past, they don&apos;t tell immigration ministers anything - and, if what he had to say this week at the official unveiling of Heathrow&apos;s biometric trial is anything to go by, current incumbent Liam Byrne is no exception. Quoted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/07/nscan07.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here in the &lt;cite&gt;Telegraph,&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Byrne observes that he does not see the Heathrow system as being a &quot;stand-alone scheme&quot;, and that the Government wanted to see it used as part of efforts to control immigration and to check the identity of people coming to this country.&amp;acirc;o[oe]&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/12/08.html#a7805</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:43:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Heathrow kicks off &apos;fingerprint fast-track&apos; security checks.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/27.html#a7720</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/27/heathrow_fingerprint_pilot/&quot;&gt;Heathrow kicks off &apos;fingerprint fast-track&apos; security checks&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Tracking with a soupcon of fast...&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;cite&gt;Telegraph&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/27/ntravel127.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;reveals&lt;/a&gt; that the UK government is plotting fingerprinting of air passengers as a matter of routine, to check the identity of departing passengers and to tighten up border controls for incoming. Which, given the firmness of the regime&apos;s plans for ID cards, is scarcely news in the long term - but in the interim, turkeys are apparently being asked to volunteer for Christmas, &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/27.html#a7720</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:32:58 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Shock, horror, outrage - biometric passport data snooped, again.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/21.html#a7686</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/17/techie_reads_bio_passport_shock/&quot;&gt;Shock, horror, outrage - biometric passport data snooped, again&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Insecurity as a design feature...&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The biometric passport has been &apos;cracked&apos; again - but it&apos;s the same crack as the old crack (which is not exactly a crack). This time it&apos;s the new UK passport, and Liberal Home Affairs spokesman Nick Clegg is calling for the urgent recall of all the 3 million that have already been issued.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/21.html#a7686</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:48:15 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Halt to school fingerprinting.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/10.html#a7641</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/09/hongkong_kiddyprinting/&quot;&gt;Halt to school fingerprinting&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;China strikes blow for privacy&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Hong Kong privacy commissioner has ordered a school to stop fingerprinting children before it becomes a runaway trend that is too late to stop.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/10.html#a7641</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:23:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Biometric ID cards an insecure menace, says EU ID outfit.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/10.html#a7633</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/10/fidis_budapest_mrtd_declaration/&quot;&gt;Biometric ID cards an insecure menace, says EU ID outfit&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Don&apos;t do it, and fix the passports ASAP, apparently...&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The EU-funded FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society) project has warned that implementation of the current generation of biometric travel ID will dramatically decrease security and privacy, and increase the risk of identity theft. In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fidis.net/press-events/press-releases/budapest-declaration/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Budapest Declaration,&lt;/a&gt; which derives from FIDIS&apos; September meeting in Budapest, FIDIS calls for short-term damage control measures to be taken (because biometric ID is already being rolled out), and for &quot;a new convincing and integrated security concept&quot; to be developed within the next three years.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/10.html#a7633</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:41:47 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>USA to ground all travellers until &apos;cleared&apos;.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/09.html#a7625</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.com/2006/11/06/grounded_until_further_notice/&quot;&gt;USA to ground all travellers until &apos;cleared&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Security as a blanket presumption of guilt&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;No one will be permitted to board an aircraft or a marine vessel leaving or bound for the United States until cleared by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), under &lt;a gref=&quot;http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=85652582346+12+0+0&amp;amp;WAISaction=retrieve&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;proposed regulations&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/09.html#a7625</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:50:39 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Beaucoup Cell-Phone Security.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/01.html#a7587</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/wireservice/0,72027-0.html?tw=rss.index&quot;&gt;Beaucoup Cell-Phone Security&lt;/a&gt;. Want a phone that can recognize you and refuse to work if you get too far away from it? A new Japanese mobile phone comes with a security card that doubles as a credit card, and has facial ID capability and password protection. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/11/01.html#a7587</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:08:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Fingerprint the expats! FCO plans phase two biometric passport.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/31.html#a7562</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/31/fco_secondary_biometric/&quot;&gt;Fingerprint the expats! FCO plans phase two biometric passport&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Cross-Channel loophole to close by 2010&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plans to add fingerprints to UK overseas passports are under way, despite the cost and complexity involved in gathering biometrics from UK citizens across the globe, a parliamentary answer revealed last week. Passports issued by the Foreign &amp;amp; Commonwealth Office are already &quot;biometric&quot;, but only in the somewhat minimalist sense required by ICAO - the addition of fingerprints, however, would pull overseas UK residents into the National Identity Register net, closing off a prized but little-known escape route.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/31.html#a7562</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:06:31 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>RFID Journal - Germany&apos;s BKA Uses RFID to Test Criminal-ID Software - RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) Technology News &amp; Features</title>			<link>http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2760/1/1/</link>			<description>Oct. 30, 2006--Germany&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bka.de/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Bundeskriminalamt&lt;/a&gt; (BKA), or Federal Criminal Investigation Office, is using &lt;a href=&apos;javascript:OpenGlossary(&quot;RFID&quot;);&apos; class=&quot;glossaryterm&quot;&gt;RFID&lt;/a&gt; as part of a test of facial-recognition software. The trial began this month and will last until January.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The country&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmi.bund.de&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Federal Ministry of the Interior&lt;/a&gt;authorized the test in mid-February, which is being held in the mainrailway station in Mainz, a city not far from Frankfurt. The projectgained new relevance in August when police foiled a plot to blow upregional trains in Germany. Video monitoring of passengers in trainstations played a key role in identifying the attempted terrorists.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/30.html#a7556</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:26:42 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Home Office thumbs up for Yeovil pub fingerprint plan.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/26.html#a7516</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/26/pub_fingerprint_plan/&quot;&gt;Home Office thumbs up for Yeovil pub fingerprint plan&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;But crime stats raise questions&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The extent of interest among local authorities to install fingerprinting security in pubs and clubs around the country has been revealed by the police brains behind the pilot scheme in Yeovil.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/26.html#a7516</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:46:03 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Steal my ID, steal my fingers - the public gets nervous.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7493</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/18/biometric_fingerchop_fears/&quot;&gt;Steal my ID, steal my fingers - the public gets nervous&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;So how many fingers do you need anyway?&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The public fears losing their fingers to ruthless biometric ID thieves in the fingerprint-controlled future, apparently. Or at least, so says Frost &amp;amp; Sullivan analyst Sapna Capoor, who argued unconvincingly that &quot;A dead finger is no good to a thief.&quot;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7493</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:22:30 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Beer fingerprints to go UK-wide.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7490</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/20/pub_fingerprints/&quot;&gt;Beer fingerprints to go UK-wide&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Yeovil, an example for us all&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The government is funding the roll out of fingerprint security at the doors of pubs and clubs in major English cities.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7490</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:10:58 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Irish passports go RFID, and naked.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7487</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/23/smart_chips_for_smart_crooks/&quot;&gt;Irish passports go RFID, and naked&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Mug me, my house is currently worth a fortune&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Analysis&lt;/strong&gt; The Irish government has begun issuing RFID passports with biometric data that can be read at a distance to comply with US regulations for its visa waiver programme.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7487</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:03:53 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Slashdot | RFID In Government Issued ID?</title>			<link>http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/10/25/0035252.shtml</link>			<description>			RFID! writes,&amp;nbsp; &quot;The Department of Homeland Security&apos;s Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee published a draft report that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_advcom_rpt_rfid_draft.pdf&quot;&gt;poured cold water on using RFID in government-mandated identity cards and documents&lt;/a&gt;(PDF link). But this met with some consternation among the DHS bureausthat plan to use RFID in this way and the businesses eager to sell thetechnology to the government, and now a vote on the report has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2006/10/24/should-government-identity-documents-use-rfid/&quot;&gt;delayed until December.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/25.html#a7477</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:47:19 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>e-Passport Solution Successfully Delivered in Ireland. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/16.html#a7458</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=101682&amp;amp;ti=e-Passport+Solution+Successfully+Delivered+in+Ireland&quot;&gt;e-Passport Solution Successfully Delivered in Ireland&lt;/a&gt;. Biometric, contactless e-passport meets requirements of U.S. visa program [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/16.html#a7458</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:59:15 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Ithaca Journal - Enhanced federal IDs could spark biometrics boom</title>			<link>http://www.theithacajournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2006608300317</link>			<description>The technology has been the stuff of movies for years: A secret agent runs his fingertip and an encrypted ID card over a pair of sensors. There&apos;s a match, and the door swings open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the coming months, a wave of government initiatives could start making such high-tech methods of identification commonplace -- beginning with the replacement this fall of federal employee IDs. Similar cards are planned for transportation workers, first responders and visitors to the United States.&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Packed with biometric data such as fingerprints and containing a computer chip with room to expand the amount of information stored, the new IDs represent a potential boon to technology companies eyeing an estimated $8 billion in identity-related contracts. Firms such as BearingPoint Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corp. have set up showcase identity labs, pulling technology from different companies into turnkey operations. Hundreds of smaller companies, down to manufacturers of plastic cards, are vying for part of the market.&lt;br&gt;The biggest business opportunity still looms: Driver&apos;s licenses, which are due for a retooling under new federal laws.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/11.html#a7429</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:51:44 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Pay By Touch puts its finger on ID verification system. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/11.html#a7424</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/35240075/article.do&quot;&gt;Pay By Touch puts its finger on ID verification system&lt;/a&gt;. Pay By Touch, a credit card processing and in-store biometrics vendor, has launched an identity verification service that allows online shoppers to make purchases by using their fingerprint to verify their identity. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/11.html#a7424</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:41:13 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Parents prepare to sue fingerprint grabbers.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/11.html#a7388</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/06/fingerprint_action/&quot;&gt;Parents prepare to sue fingerprint grabbers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Schools to be challenged over biometrics&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;Parents are preparing a legal challenge to schools that have fingerprinted their children without their consent.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/11.html#a7388</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:25:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Byrne sprinkles biometric ID pixie dust over immigration &apos;issue&apos;.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/10.html#a7385</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/09/byrne_biometric_visa/&quot;&gt;Byrne sprinkles biometric ID pixie dust over immigration &apos;issue&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Magics &apos;new&apos; data from old pilots&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;Home Office Minister Liam Byrne was today scheduled to pitch ID cards as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/08/nidcards08.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a crucial weapon in the fight against illegal immigrants,&lt;/a&gt; according to the advance spin in yesterday&apos;s &lt;cite&gt;Sunday Telegraph.&lt;/cite&gt; The paper, entirely forgetting about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/22/blair_biometric_migration_fix/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tony&apos;s Fortress Britain,&lt;/a&gt; claims the switch to playing the immigration card is a &quot;fresh approach&quot; from John Reid, this week&apos;s Home Secretary.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/10/10.html#a7385</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:59:16 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Keystroke Dynamics.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/25.html#a7324</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infosecwriters.com/texts.php?op=display&amp;amp;id=498&quot;&gt;Keystroke Dynamics&lt;/a&gt;. In this paper Tom Olzak takes a look at biometrics, followed by keystroke dynamics, including history, how it works, and why it may be the answer for organizations with people or cost issues. By Tom Olzak. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infosecwriters.com/&quot;&gt;Infosec Writers Latest Security Papers&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/25.html#a7324</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:58:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.infosecwriters.com/isw.xml">Infosec Writers Latest Security Papers</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>People prefer iPods to biometric passports.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/20.html#a7285</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/20/ipod_passport/&quot;&gt;People prefer iPods to biometric passports&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Anyone for an iDcard?&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Home Office has tried to frighten people into taking its identity plans seriously by publishing a marketing survey it said proved their passports were easy targets for ruthless criminals.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/20.html#a7285</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:48:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Headmaster justifies fingerprinting pupils.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/14.html#a7252</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/11/porth_county_kiddyprinting/&quot;&gt;Headmaster justifies fingerprinting pupils&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;&apos;We don&apos;t have to ask parents&apos;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The headmaster of Porth County Comprehensive School in South Wales has defended fingerprinting all 1,400 of his pupils days after their parents were told about the scheme last Wednesday.&lt;/p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/14.html#a7252</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:57:41 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Who Says When Biometrics Data Is Wrong?</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/05.html#a7182</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://linuxbiometrics.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2&quot;&gt;Who Says When Biometrics Data Is Wrong?&lt;/a&gt; An article over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://technocrat.net/article.pl?sid=05/08/06/2253253&amp;amp;mode=nocomment&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Technokrati&lt;/a&gt; called Biometric data integrity and error correction brings up the point of getting the information in a database corrected when humans get labeled wrong. How does an African male prove that he isn&apos;t the Swedish female that his passport claims he is? It is something worth keeping in mind. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://linuxbiometrics.com/&quot;&gt;LinuxBiometrics.com&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/09/05.html#a7182</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:10:14 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://linuxbiometrics.com/backend.php">LinuxBiometrics.com</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Feds Show Off Massive Database.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/31.html#a7157</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired27b/%7E3/17781183/index.blog&quot;&gt;Feds Show Off Massive Database&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;Feeling a little burnt from stories about its technological incompetence, the Justice Department wooed reporters Tuesday with its massive anti-terrorism database that contains some 659 million records comprising no-fly list data, airline records, driver&apos;s license numbers, social security numbers and suspicious financial activityreports, according to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082901520.html&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; from Ellen Nakashima in the &lt;cite&gt;Washington Post&lt;/cite&gt;. &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Privacy advocates said the Investigative Data Warehouse, launched in January 2004, raises concerns about how long the government stores such information and about the right of citizens to know what records are kept and correct information that is wrong. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The data warehouse is an effort to &quot;connect the dots&quot; that the FBI was accused of missing in the months before the 2001 attacks, bureau officials said. About a quarter of the information comes from the FBI&apos;s records and criminal case files. The rest -- including suspicious financial activity reports, no-fly lists, and lost and stolen passport data -- comes from the Treasury, State and Homeland Security departments and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;One assumes that the database includes such things as the hundreds of thousands of records agents culled in 2003 from Las Vegas hotels and casinos, rental car agencies and airlines as part of their response to increased intelligence chatter. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This system is not totally unknown -- Washington Post journalist Robert O&apos;Harrow, Jr. covered it in his book &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,66177,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2&quot;&gt;No Place to Hide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kenneth Ritchhart, the man who headed the project, made his aims clear to O&apos;Harrow: John Poindexter&apos;s Total Information Awareness project. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The technology that he&apos;s looking at,&quot; Ritchhart told O&apos;Harrow, &quot;is right up our alley.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it legal? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depends on who you talk to. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s not clear the agency has ever disclosed the database in the Federal Registry or published Privacy Impact Assessments as required by law. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You might also remember that the Justice Department exempted its criminal databases in 2003 from the requirement that they be accurate. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s now not their problem, its yours.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/wbs70/&quot;&gt;Wbs 70&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired27b/%7E4/17781183&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/&quot;&gt;27B Stroke 6&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/31.html#a7157</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:52:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/rss.xml">27B Stroke 6</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF - miniLinks for 2006-08-30.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/31.html#a7155</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004888.php&quot;&gt;miniLinks for 2006-08-30&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;ul style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopbadware.org/reports/reportdisplay?reportname=aol082706&quot;&gt; AOL Goes From Badware to Worseware&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;As AOL&apos;s servers give out your search terms, its client takes control of your computer without permission. What&apos;s not to like?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/technology/28link.html?pagewanted=2&amp;amp;_r=2&amp;amp;ref=business&quot;&gt; Barney&apos;s Last Gasp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;New York Times sees our case as the final straw for the purple dinosaur.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700511.html&quot;&gt; Boomtime for Biometrics Manufacturers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tech companies eye $8 billion in government ID contracts.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://info.intgovforum.org/yoppy.php?poj=17&quot;&gt; IGF IP workshop                                                              &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;IP Justice, EFF, and CPTech, eFIL, ask the Internet Governance Forum           to look at impact of overbroad IP on  the Internet.                            &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1154423136542&quot;&gt; Preemptive Cease and Desists bad for ... Lawyers?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;American Lawyer looks at the media outrage that bad publicity blanket C&amp;amp;D letters gather.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=155910&quot;&gt; Free Wi-Fi - Just No Free Speech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Culver City, home of the film studios, starts filtering its free muni wi-fi&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.culvercitywifi.org/wifi_access.html&quot;&gt; Or Constitutional Rights&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;... while its terms of service declare you&apos;ve waived your First Amendment rights.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ceop.gov.uk/news_items/article_20060821_ceop.htm&quot;&gt; Press Here to Waste Police Time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;MSN Messenger apps will have a one-click &quot;report sex offender&quot; button in the UK.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/28/AR2006082800849.&quot;&gt; Give us Your Poor, Your Huddled Personal Information&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Michael Chertoff asks our &quot;European allies&quot; to hand over their citizens&apos; personal data to the US.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/31.html#a7155</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:49:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Motor Vehicle Agency Implements Biometrics. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/29.html#a7132</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=100734&amp;amp;ti=Motor+Vehicle+Agency+Implements+Biometrics&quot;&gt;Motor Vehicle Agency Implements Biometrics&lt;/a&gt;. Facial recognition tool used to stop identity theft and related crimes [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/29.html#a7132</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:34:58 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>London school to fingerprint students</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/29.html#a7125</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/29/school_fingerprints_students/&quot;&gt;London school to fingerprint students&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;But only to monitor attendance, school claims&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;A London school is to embark on a trial to fingerprint children when they return to school.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/29.html#a7125</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:19:32 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Unlocking Fingerprints - Plan for Enhanced Federal IDs Could Open Door to a Biometrics Boom</title>			<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700511_pf.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;The technology has been the stuff of movies for years: A secretagent runs his fingertip and an encrypted ID card over a pair ofsensors. There&apos;s a match, and the door swings open.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the comingmonths, a wave of government initiatives could start making suchhigh-tech methods of identification commonplace -- beginning with thereplacement this fall of federal employee IDs. Similar cards areplanned for transportation workers, first responders and visitors tothe United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Packed with biometric data such asfingerprints and containing a computer chip with room to expand theamount of information stored, the new IDs represent a potential boon totechnology companies eyeing an estimated $8 billion in identity-relatedcontracts. Firms such as BearingPoint Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corp.have set up showcase identity labs, pulling technology from differentcompanies into turnkey operations. Hundreds of smaller companies, downto manufacturers of plastic cards, are vying for part of the market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The biggest business opportunity still looms: Driver&apos;s licenses, which are due for a retooling under new federal laws.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Whenyou&apos;re talking about credentialing the federal workforce andcontractors, you&apos;re talking about maybe 10 million people. When you&apos;retalking first responders, you&apos;re at 20, 30 or 40 million people,&quot; saidThomas Greco, a vice president at Herndon-based Cybertrust Inc. &quot;Butwhen you&apos;re talking credentialing all registered drivers in the UnitedStates, you&apos;re up to hundreds of millions of people. Nobody is losingsight of that.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In an era of chronic concern over terrorism andanxiety over immigration, the business of determining who is who hasbecome increasingly urgent. But it is not without controversy.Americans have long resisted the idea of a national ID card, forexample. The growing sophistication of computer databases and networkshas heightened privacy concerns -- as have data breaches, from thetheft or loss of government computers to AOL&apos;s online posting of 36million keyword searches conducted by hundreds of thousands ofsubscribers. If the pool of government programs using the new identitytechnology gets large enough and the amount of information collectedgets detailed enough, &quot;there will be a lot of pressure for theseprograms to converge,&quot; creating a de facto national identity system,said Barry Steinhardt, director of the technology and liberty projectat the American Civil Liberties Union.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Use of a new governmentstandard may prompt the private sector to follow. The banking,retailing and health-care industries are monitoring the federalinitiatives, ready to apply stricter identity standards when dealingwith their employees and customers. In an online world, the technologycould also be used to establish that two people who never meet inperson really are who they say they are.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Federal agencies aresupposed to begin issuing their new ID cards in October, complying witha 2004 Bush administration directive requiring more stringent methodsfor tracking who gets access to federal facilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/28.html#a7116</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:38:42 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Slashdot | E-Passport In the Works</title>			<link>http://politics.slashdot.org/politics/06/08/22/1352255.shtml</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://snakesonaplane.varitalk.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ExE122&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;In an attempt to curb falsification of passports, the United States has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/22/BUG2SKMIJ91.DTL&quot;&gt;placed an order for millions of embedded ID chips&lt;/a&gt;.&apos;The chips carry an encrypted digital photograph of the passportholder. The chip is designed to be read by a special device that willbe used by U.S. government workers who check passports when travelerscome through border crossings. The State Department began issuing whatare being called e-passports to tourists last week and will graduallyincrease production. State Department spokeswoman Janelle Hironimussaid existing passports will remain valid until they expire but,eventually, all U.S. passports -- about 13 million will be issued in2006 -- will contain such chips.&apos;&quot;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/22.html#a7060</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:47:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Infineon chips to be used in U.S. e-passports.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/21.html#a7041</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/15149651/article.do&quot;&gt;Infineon chips to be used in U.S. e-passports&lt;/a&gt;. German chip maker Infineon Technologies will supply chips for new electronic passports  the U.S. government will begin issuing in October. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/21.html#a7041</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:32:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Google to do Image &amp; Face Recognition ??</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/17.html#a7013</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/08/15/google-to-do-image-face-recognition/&quot;&gt;Google to do Image &amp;amp; Face Recognition&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;In a quick follow-up to &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/08/14/gmail-pictures-used-for-face-recognition/&quot;&gt;this speculation&lt;/a&gt; about Google using Gmail photos to build a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2006/03/14/commercial-data-aggregationof-my-image/&quot;&gt;facial recognition database&lt;/a&gt;, Google just &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/08/better-way-to-organize-photos.html&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; they acquired &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nevenvision.com/&quot;&gt;Neven Vision&lt;/a&gt;, a company that develops technology to detect and recognize objects and persons in images. While Google is currently spinning this as a new way to help organize your photos (the software could automatically group all images on a hard drive with one[base &apos;]s ex-girlfriend[base &apos;]s face in it), it could also be integrated into their image search engine (to automatically find all images on the web with one[base &apos;]s ex-girlfriend[base &apos;]s face in it) or to create a mobile version so when you snap a picture of a random person on the street, Google can tell you if her face happens to be someone else[base &apos;]s ex-girlfriend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[via &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/08/object-recognition-is-future-of-google.html&quot;&gt;Google Operating System&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/17.html#a7013</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:20:31 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Chipped Passports Coming Monday. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/13.html#a6976</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/11517113/0,71583-0.html&quot;&gt;Chipped Passports Coming Monday&lt;/a&gt;. Scorned by privacy groups but embraced by the State Department, the new &quot;smart&quot; documents soon will land in the hands of U.S. citizens. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/13.html#a6976</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:17:46 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>U.S. to Begin Rollout of E-Passports</title>			<link>http://www.topix.net/content/ap/0460919739402830447913941874032546701091</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Despite ongoing &lt;a class=&quot;xref&quot; href=&quot;http://www.topix.net/news/privacy&quot;&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;concerns and legal disputes involving companies bidding on the project,the U.S. State Department plans to begin issuing smart chip-embeddedpassports to Americans as planned Monday.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Not even the foiledterror plot that heightened security checks at airports nationwidethreatens to delay the rollout, the agency said. Any hitches in gettingthe technology to work properly could add even longer waits totravelers already facing lengthy security lines at airports.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thenew U.S. passports will include a chip that contains all the datacontained in the paper version _ name, birthdate, gender, for example _and can be read by electronic scanners at equipped airports. The StateDepartment says they will speed up going through customs and helpenhance border security.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Privacy groups continue to raise concerns about the security of the electronic information and a German &lt;a class=&quot;xref&quot; href=&quot;http://www.topix.net/tech/computer-security&quot;&gt;computer security&lt;/a&gt;expert earlier this month demonstrated in Las Vegas how personalinformation stored on the documents could be copied and transferred toanother device.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But electronic cloning does not constitute athreat because the information on the chips, including the photograph,is encrypted and cannot be changed, according to the Smart CardAlliance, a New Jersey-based not-for-profit made up of governmentagencies and industry players.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&apos;It&apos;s no different than someonestealing your passport and trying to use it,&apos; Randy Vanderhoof,executive director of the alliance, said in a statement. &apos;No one elsecan use it because your photo is on the chip and they&apos;re not you.&apos;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/13.html#a6975</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:13:37 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>RFID passports cloned and shown to be poorly shielded.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/10.html#a6958</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001093.html&quot;&gt;RFID passports cloned and shown to be poorly shielded&lt;/a&gt;. I wasn&apos;t there, but at a hacker conference last weekend in Las Vegas, two different security research groups publicly demonstrated major vulnerabilities in the RFID passports now beginning to be issued by the USA and many other countries.Using a new German passport (based on the same ISO14443 and ICAO document 9303 specifications as the new USA passports with RFID chips), Lukas Grunwald of DN-Systems showed how the data on the RFID chip in each of these passports could be remotely read, copied onto another off-the-shelf blank chip, and used to fool an RFID reader .After Grunwald&apos;s demonstration some RFID proponents claimed that the encryption of most of the data on the chip (although not the unique chip ID number broadcast in the clear ) would prevent the use of a cloned RFID passport chip for digital impersonation -- conveniently forgetting that the encryption has already been cracked .At least as significant, but much less widely publicized, was another report on tests by Flexilis of the RF shielding in the outer covers of the RFID passports, which has been heavily advertised by the USA State Department as &quot;preventing&quot; reading of the RFID chip unless the passport is deliberately opened.The graph on page 2 of the experimental results shows that an RFID passport &quot;shielded&quot; according to the current standard could be read from 4 (10 cm) inches away (e.g. by someone bumping against the outside of the victims&apos; pocket or purse with an RFID reader in a piece of luggage) if the covers gapped open as much as 1/2 inch (1.2 cm) at their outer edges, as could easily happen inadvertently.  Even a 1/4 inch (7 mm) gap between the outer edges of the passport covers allowed reading from 1 1/2 inches (4 cm) away, well within the plausible range of a approach for a &quot;bump&quot; attack through clothing or a purse.  And as has already been demonstrated , the distances at which the chips can be read will likely continue to increase with improved readers during the 10-year validity of RFID passports now being issued.If you want a new USA passport (valid for the next 10 years) without an RFID chip, apply for one now .  You probably just barely have time, if you do so immediately.  When you get your new passport, check for the RFID logo on the front cover; if you find it, please let me know right away when and by which office your passport was issued, so I can spread the word.And if you do get stuck with an RFID passport, don&apos;t rely on adequate shielding being built into the cover.  Keep it wrapped in electrically conductive mylar or aluminum foil, or in one of these RF-shielding cases whenever you don&apos;t want it read. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://hasbrouck.org/blog/&quot;&gt;The Practical Nomad&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/10.html#a6958</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:44:49 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://hasbrouck.org/blog/index.rdf">The Practical Nomad</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Last Chance for a Chipless Passport?</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6878</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired27b/%7E3/8933975/index.blog&quot;&gt;Last Chance for a Chipless Passport?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/passportstamps.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;passport stamps&quot; title=&quot;What the Inside of a Travel Database Looks Like&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;164&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The e-passport is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,65412,00.html&quot;&gt;coming&lt;/a&gt;. The e-passport is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=6701&quot;&gt;coming&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67333,00.html&quot;&gt;much ado&lt;/a&gt;, the United States has begun or will begin issuing passports with RFID chips in them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The passports now have some anti-skimming features, including Basic Access Control and some sort of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67066,00.html&quot;&gt;internal tin-foil hat&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the chips are &lt;a href=&quot;http://wired.com/news/technology/0,71521-0.html?tw=wn_index_1&quot;&gt;readily clonable&lt;/a&gt;, and some security experts still aren&apos;t sure they are a good idea. Also, it&apos;s just plain creepy to be on the same level as a pallet from WalMart.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You might still be able to get a passport without the chip and that passport will be good for 10 years -- long enough to get you to the point where new passports will be RFID chips implanted in your neck.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Travel privacy guru Edward Hasbrouckhad a &lt;a href=&quot;http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001060.html&quot;&gt;good post&lt;/a&gt; up in May about how to maximize your chances of getting a chip-less passport, which involves a little extra money anda refundable ticket. The trick still might work.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You can also make sure your passport lasts longer by including with your application a written letter that says you need extra pages.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The government&apos;s page on getting a new passport is &lt;a href=&quot;http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/first/first_832.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and renewals are &lt;a href=&quot;http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/renew/renew_833.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, but so far, the State Department hasn&apos;t returned my call asking if they are actually issuing the passports, though the last report I read was that they were starting with the Denver office.&lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p&gt;Photo: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/tribalbazaardotcom/&quot;&gt;Jesse Edwards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired27b/%7E4/8933975&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/&quot;&gt;27B Stroke 6&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6878</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:35:07 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/rss.xml">27B Stroke 6</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>How to clone the copy-friendly biometric passport.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6867</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/04/cloning_epassports/&quot;&gt;How to clone the copy-friendly biometric passport&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;So easy the manual tells you that you can do it&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Analysis&lt;/strong&gt; At Black Hat yesterday, security consultant Lukas Grunwald of German company DN-Systems demonstrated the cloning of a biometric passport, observing beforehand &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71521-0.html?tw=rss.index&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to Wired&lt;/a&gt; that the &quot;whole passport design is totally brain damaged.&quot; But should we be surprised? Not exactly, because that&apos;s precisely what it says on the tin.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6867</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:06:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>e-passport cloning risks exposed.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6866</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/04/e-passport_hack_attack/&quot;&gt;e-passport cloning risks exposed&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;RFID hack attack&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;A security consultant has shown how to clone electronic passports based on internationally agreed designs due to begin distribution this year.&lt;/p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/08/04.html#a6866</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:04:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Future of Crime - Biometric Spoofing? </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/31.html#a6835</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/http%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Farticle.pl%3Fsid%3D06%2F07%2F21%2F1248204%26from%3Drss&quot;&gt;The Future of Crime - Biometric Spoofing?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; AxisPower9 writes &quot;What we often watch in films and television - circumventing biometric security access - is turning from science-fiction to reality. Bori Toth, biometric research and advisory lead at Deloitte &amp;amp; Touche, warned that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnetasia.com/toolkits/0,39047352,39376855-39094240p,00.htm&quot;&gt;biometric spoofing is a growing concern&lt;/a&gt;. From the article: &apos;We are leaving our prints everywhere so the chance of someone lifting them and copying them is real. Currently it&apos;s only researchers that are doing spoofing and copying. It&apos;s not a mainstream activity--but it will be. Many people are trying to regard biometrics as secret but they aren&apos;t. Our faces and irises are visible and our voices are being recorded. Fingerprints and DNA are left everywhere we go and it&apos;s been proved that these are real threats.&apos;&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/31.html#a6835</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:35:52 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Kiddiprinters! EU biometric ID plans reach out for the children.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/31.html#a6831</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/31/eu_fingerprinting_kids/&quot;&gt;Kiddiprinters! EU biometric ID plans reach out for the children&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;You&apos;re never too young to get a record, say interior ministers&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The EU is planning to fingerprint children from as young as six, and earlier just as soon as it is technically feasible, according to documents obtained by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statewatch.org/news/2006/jul/08fingerprinting-children.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Statewatch.&lt;/a&gt; The matter has already caused considerable debate (albeit behind closed doors and with no visible civil liberties concerns) among member states, but is being pushed ahead as part of a broader push towards biometric identifiers, without reference to the European Parliament.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/31.html#a6831</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:17:07 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>UK ID card scheme near collapse, as Blair pushes cut-down &apos;variant&apos;.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/10.html#a6652</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://go.theregister.com/feed/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/09/st_id_cards_doomed_emails/&quot;&gt;UK ID card scheme near collapse, as Blair pushes cut-down &apos;variant&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h4&gt;Leaked emails detail train, track, buffers&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;The UK ID card scheme is doomed to fail, and an attempt to put a face-saving downscaled version into place threatens to wreck the project sooner, rather than later, according to civil service correspondence. An email exchange between David Foord of the Office of Government Commerce and Peter Smith, acting commercial director of the Identity and Passport Service, leaked &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2261631,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to the Sunday Times,&lt;/a&gt; paints a picture of an impossible mission, a &quot;Mr Blair&quot; driving a cut-down &quot;early variant&quot; card and a Passport Service already making contingency plans in anticipation of ID cards crashing in flames.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/biometrics/2006/07/10.html#a6652</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:01:22 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.theregister.co.uk/internet/rights/headlines.rss">The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs</source>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>