<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.2.1 on Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:49:37 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Paul Hardwick: Security</title>		<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/</link>		<description>Security issues, software and reports.</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:49:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.2.1</generator>		<managingEditor>editor.radio (-at-) MacRonin.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>webmaster.radio(-at-) MacRonin.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>6</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>7</hour>			<hour>1</hour>			</skipHours>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>Sun CSO: Endless Internet Growth Keeps Security on Back Burner. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8815</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/101199930/article.do&quot;&gt;Sun CSO: Endless Internet Growth Keeps Security on Back Burner&lt;/a&gt;. Q&amp;amp;A: Whitfield Diffie, chief security officer at Sun and co-inventor of public-key cryptography, talks about the state of computer security and Microsoft[base &apos;]s role in it. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8815</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:07:25 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Four Colorado Counties Placed on Election Watch List.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8814</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104367&amp;amp;ti=Four+Colorado+Counties+Placed+on+Election+Watch+List&quot;&gt;Four Colorado Counties Placed on Election Watch List&lt;/a&gt;. Errors with voting machines, delays in voting, inadequate security cited. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8814</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:04:05 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>ID Fraud Manufacturing Ring Uncovered in Arizona.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8813</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104383&amp;amp;ti=ID+Fraud+Manufacturing+Ring+Uncovered+in+Arizona&quot;&gt;ID Fraud Manufacturing Ring Uncovered in Arizona&lt;/a&gt;. Three month investigation of Arizona Homeland Security Fraudulent Identification Task Force (AFIT) uncovers one of the largest manufacturers of fraudulent identification in Southern Arizona. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8813</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:00:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Airport security targets the inside threat - CNN.com</title>			<link>http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/03/12/tsa.crackdown/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;TAMPA, Florida&lt;/b&gt; (CNN) -- The Transportation SecurityAdministration carried out surprise inspections on workers at fiveairports in Florida and Puerto Rico on Monday, one week after a baggagehandler in Orlando allegedly used his airport credentials to smugglemore than a dozen firearms into a commercial jetliner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some 160TSA officers, backed by Federal Air Marshals and local police, searchedairplanes for contraband, shined flashlights in airport vehicles andpatted down contractor employees involved in airport security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The five airports inspected were in Tampa, Orlando, Miami, Fort Lauderdale and San Juan, Puerto Rico. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Theairport crackdown will continue through the week, spreading to otherregions in the country as TSA increases random, unannounced searchestargeting those who could misuse their access within the system. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;We realize the insider threat is a real threat, and we have to address it,&quot; said TSA spokesman Christopher White.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8812</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:58:40 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Latest ID-Theft Worry? Copiers. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8811</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/101464208/PHOTOCOPIER_RISKS&quot;&gt;Latest ID-Theft Worry? Copiers&lt;/a&gt;. Digital photocopiers use hard drives to store data. If not properly secured, they can be vulnerable to data thieves. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8811</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:55:53 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Dispute surfaces over certification for personal health records</title>			<link>http://govhealthit.com/article97910-03-14-07-Web</link>			<description>n a rare instance of public dissent, an American Health InformationCommunity AHIC) workgroup has split over whether to recommend thatproduct certification be available for personal health record software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AHIC, a high-level advisory committee to the Department ofHealth and Human Services, sided with the majority on its ConsumerEmpowerment Workgroup and voted unanimously in favor of thecertification recommendation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A minority -- five members ofthe 23-person workgroup -- took the position that certification wouldbe premature and the top priority should be privacy and securitypolicies for PHRs. &quot;The risks [of certification now] outweigh anypotential benefits,&quot; the dissenters said in a letter to AHIC. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Theworkgroup&apos;s task is to foster widespread adoption of PHRs. One of itsleaders, Dr. Rose Marie Robertson, told AHIC that the group believesPHRs will be more widely used if consumers do not have to sit at acomputer and enter all their health information. Instead, the PHRscould be populated by data from doctors, health plans, drug stores, orelsewhere.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8809</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:51:04 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Medical data on Blue Cross members may be lost | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Medical+data+on+Blue+Cross+members+may+be+lost/2100-1029_3-6167066.html?tag=nefd.top</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;WellPoint, one of the nation&apos;s largest health insurers, has begunnotifying 75,000 members of its Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield unitin New York that a CD holding their vital medical and other personalinformation has disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The information was on an unencrypted disc that a subcontractorrecently sent to Magellan Behavioral Services, a company in Avon,Conn., that specializes in monitoring and coordinating mental healthand substance abuse treatments for insurance companies. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Empire began notifying the affected consumers by mail on Saturday thattheir records--including their names, Social Security numbers, healthplan identification numbers and description of medical services back to2003--had been lost. &lt;/p&gt;[...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before shipping the information to Magellan, the coding and passwordsthat protect the privacy of the information was removed by a Magellansubcontractor, Lisa Ann Greiner, an Empire spokeswoman, said Tuesday. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Janlori Goldman, the director of the Health Privacy Center, a nonprofitorganization in Washington, said the error was an &quot;egregious breach ofprivacy.&quot; She said that insurance companies were responsible under afederal privacy law for ensuring that their contractors use adequatesecurity procedures. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greiner said that the subcontractor, Health Data Management Services,worked for Magellan, not Empire. &quot;If any contract was breached, we aregoing to take direct action,&quot; she said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8808</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:41 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Photocopiers: The newest ID theft threat. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8806</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/101698132/article.do&quot;&gt;Photocopiers: The newest ID theft threat&lt;/a&gt;. Photocopiers made in recent years often have hard drives that store what&apos;s been duplicated -- making them a potential target for identity thieves. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8806</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:40:11 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>CDT Calls for Judicial Approval of National Security Letters. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8805</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/978&quot;&gt;CDT Calls for Judicial Approval of National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt;. CDT is calling on Congress to require judicial supervision of FBI requests for access to the sensitive records of US citizens to protect privacy and national security.  Recent revelations regarding violations in the use of so-called &quot;national security letters&quot; have shown that no matter how many internal controls the FBI adopts, self-certification is not sufficient when the government is obtaining the sensitive financial and communications records of citizens.  CDT believes Congress should reform the law and adopt a reasonable system of judicial checks and balances. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/14.html#a8805</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:35:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>How to surf anonymously without a trace - ComputerWorld</title>			<link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012778</link>			<description>The punchline to an old cartoon is &quot;On the Internet, nobody knows you&apos;re a dog,&quot; but these days, that&apos;s no longer true. &lt;p&gt;It&apos;s easier than ever for the government, Web sites and privatebusinesses to track exactly what you do online, know where you&apos;vevisited, and build up comprehensive profiles about your likes, dislikesand private habits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And with the federal government increasingly demanding onlinerecords from sites such as Google and others, your online privacy iseven more endangered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you don&apos;t need to be a victim. There are things you can do tokeep your surfing habits anonymous and protect your online privacy. Soread on to find out how to keep your privacy to yourself when you usethe Internet, without spending a penny.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8797</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:51:27 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Do You Need to Surf Anonymously?  </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8796</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/101411014/article.pl&quot;&gt;Do You Need to Surf Anonymously?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; An anonymous reader writes &quot;Computerworld has up an article entitled &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9012778&quot;&gt;How to Surf Anonymously without a Trace&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. It purports to offer tips on how to avoid detection by anyone attempting to monitor your internet access. &apos;If you don&apos;t like the limitations imposed on you by [proxy] sites like the Cloak or would simply prefer to configure anonymous surfing yourself, you can easily set up your browser to use an anonymous proxy server to sit between you and the sites you visit. To use an anonymous proxy server with your browser, first find an anonymous proxy server. Hundreds of free, public proxy servers are available, but many frequently go offline or are very slow. Many sites compile lists of these proxy servers, including Public Proxy Servers and the Atom InterSoft proxy server list.&apos;&quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Ea/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline?a=iCb1Y5&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Ea/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline?i=iCb1Y5&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E4/101411014&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8796</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:48:57 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>New US Computer Forensic Institute. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8793</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/101444331/article.pl&quot;&gt;New US Computer Forensic Institute&lt;/a&gt;. 			Quincy writes &lt;i&gt;&quot;The DHS and Secret Service are &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070313-dhs-secret-service-to-open-computer-forensic-institute.html&quot;&gt;setting up a new computer forensic institute in Alabama&lt;/a&gt;.Set to open in mid-2008, the new National Computer Forensic Institutewill be able to train over 900 law enforcement officers per year. &apos;Itwill initially be staffed by 18 Secret Service agents and will featureclassrooms, a forensic laboratory, an evidence vault, and server rooms.Courses will be offered in the investigation of electronic crimes,network intrusion investigation, and computer forensics... [T]he SecretService says that it will help to bring judges and prosecutors up tospeed as well.&apos;&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Maybe over time we&apos;ll see &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/15/2355233&amp;amp;tid=123&quot;&gt;fewer botches of justice like those in the news recently&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8793</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:33:22 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>CDT Opposes Bill Expanding Pentagon Domestic Data Mining.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8789</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/979&quot;&gt;CDT Opposes Bill Expanding Pentagon Domestic Data Mining&lt;/a&gt;. CDT and other civil liberties groups are urging Congress to reject legislation that would exempt the Department of Defense from a key provision of the Privacy Act.  The little-noticed amendment, already included in the Senate version of the Intelligence Authorization Act, would permit government agencies to disclose information on US citizens to the Defense Department. Such language could pave the way for entire databases of information to be transferred to the Defense Department without a clear purpose -- in turn opening the door to greater data mining by military agencies. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8789</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:07:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>CDT Calls for Reform of National Security Letters. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8788</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org/headlines/978&quot;&gt;CDT Calls for Reform of National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt;. CDT is calling on Congress to require judicial approval of FBI efforts to access the sensitive records of US citizens.  Recent revelations regarding violations in the use of so-called &quot;national security letters&quot; have shown that no matter how many internal controls the FBI adopts, self-certification in not sufficient when the government is obtaining the sensitive financial and communications records of citizens.  CDT believes Congress should reform the law and adopt a reasonable system of judicial checks and balances. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdt.org&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8788</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:04:02 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.cdt.org/headlines/recent.rss">Center for Democracy and Technology</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>McAfee Says Vista&apos;s StickyKeys Could Be Misused.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8787</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/101245426/article.html&quot;&gt;McAfee Says Vista&apos;s StickyKeys Could Be Misused&lt;/a&gt;. A Windows Vista feature designed to simplify computing for disabled users has security implications, according to a McAfee researcher. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8787</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:02:15 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Secure your enterprise data.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8785</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csoonline.com.au/index.php?id=1956754899&amp;amp;rid=-302&quot;&gt;Secure your enterprise data&lt;/a&gt;. For DuPont, Gary Min may have seemed a model employee. A research chemist at DuPont&apos;s research laboratory in Circleville, Ohio, Min was a naturalized U.S. citizen with a doctorate from the University of Pennsylvania who had worked for DuPont for 10 years, even earning a business degree from Ohio State University with help from his employer. But Min&apos;s veneer of respectability began to crack on Dec. 12, 2005, when he told his employer he would be leaving his job. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csoonline.com.au&quot;&gt;CSO Online Data Security Briefing&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/13.html#a8785</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:57:32 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.csoonline.com.au/CSO_Online_Data_Security_Briefing.xml">CSO Online Data Security Briefing</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>courant.com | Our I.D., Their Trash - Sensitive Records Turn Up In Ohio</title>			<link>http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-cttrash0310.artmar10,0,133480.story?coll=hc-headlines-local</link>			<description>Papers with sensitive information about Connecticut residents - SocialSecurity numbers, medical records, names, phone numbers, addresses andbank records began blowing from an Ohio landfill onto nearby homeownerHarry Evans&apos; yard months ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At first he just picked up the litter - dozens of papers in all - andthrew it away. But about a week ago, Evans says, he talked with hiswife about the personal nature of some of the windblown papers anddecided he&apos;d had enough. He called the local media. Soon, newspaper andTV reporters descended on his home in Negley.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8775</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:41:49 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>TorontoSun.com - Canada - Privacy swipe? New system would check IDs in stores</title>			<link>http://torontosun.com/News/Canada/2007/03/09/3719801-sun.html</link>			<description>Convenience stores that check ID by swiping driver&apos;s licences couldbe violating privacy law, Government Services Minister Gerry Phillipssaid Wednesday. &lt;p&gt; The system called &quot;We Expect ID,&quot; wouldsee store clerks swipe licences through a lottery terminal to verify acustomer&apos;s age when purchasing alcohol, cigarettes, adult magazines,lottery tickets or fireworks. The terminal will read age informationfrom the magnetic stripe on the licence and display the person&apos;s age onthe terminal. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8774</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:38:21 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Popular P2P apps could expose sensitive files, report says. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8773</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/101187953/article.do&quot;&gt;Popular P2P apps could expose sensitive files, report says&lt;/a&gt;. Five popular peer-to-peer file-sharing applications include features that could allow users to inadverdently share sensitive files on their computers with others, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8773</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:33:43 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>&apos;Do the Right Thing&apos;. Editorial</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8772</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/101029486/article.do&quot;&gt;&apos;Do the Right Thing&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. Editorial: There is no greater hallmark of an IT leader than the courage it takes to do what[base &apos;]s right, says Don Tennant. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8772</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:32:08 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Seagate Ships Super-Secure Hard Disk Drive. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8769</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/101131375/article.html&quot;&gt;Seagate Ships Super-Secure Hard Disk Drive&lt;/a&gt;. ASI Computer Technologies will use the automatically encrypted Momentus in a laptop. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8769</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:18:52 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Human Error Causes Most Data Loss, Study Says. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8768</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/101149159/article.html&quot;&gt;Human Error Causes Most Data Loss, Study Says&lt;/a&gt;. Three-quarters of incidents involving loss of sensitive data are caused by human error, according to researchers. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8768</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:08:30 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>QuickTime Security Update Taxes Some Mac Users.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8765</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/quicktime_security_update_kill.html&quot;&gt;QuickTime Security Update Taxes Some Mac Users&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Some computer users running &lt;strong&gt;Apple Mac OS X&lt;/strong&gt; are having a bit of &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.turbotax.intuit.com/cgi-bin/turbotax.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=3069&quot;&gt;a taxing time&lt;/a&gt; with the &lt;strong&gt;TurboTax&lt;/strong&gt; software after installing a recent security update for Apple&apos;s &lt;strong&gt;QuickTime&lt;/strong&gt; media player. The QuickTime update, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/apple_patches_quicktime_holes.html&quot;&gt;released last week&lt;/a&gt;, effectively prevents a number of programs from launching. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem appears to be limited to users of &lt;strong&gt;Mac OS X 10.3.9&lt;/strong&gt; and earlier versions, but the interference caused by the QuickTime update is not limited to TurboTax. The update is reportedly causing problems with games such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/&quot;&gt;World of Warcraft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/#S22480&quot;&gt;Age of Empires III&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/#S22480&quot;&gt;Full Tilt Poker&lt;/a&gt; and Snake, according to numerous threads at the online user forums of both &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=879226&amp;amp;threadrate=2&amp;amp;messageid=4193423#4193423&quot;&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.turbotax.com/intuit/board/message?board.id=installupdate06&amp;amp;message.id=2269&amp;amp;view=by_date_ascending&amp;amp;page=1&quot;&gt;TurboTax&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It looks like TurboTax parent &lt;strong&gt;Intuit&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.turbotax.com/intuit/board/message?board.id=installupdate06&amp;amp;message.id=2269&amp;amp;view=by_date_ascending&amp;amp;page=4&quot;&gt;plans to release an update on Monday&lt;/a&gt; to try and work around Apple&apos;s  patch. The company even posted a link where users can leave their contact information to be alerted when a fix is available. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For many users, that response stood in contrast to Apple&apos;s, which -- now a week after this &quot;QuickTax&quot; problem was first highlighted -- so far has been non-existent. &lt;strong&gt;Michael Molton&lt;/strong&gt;, a software engineer from Virginia Beach, Va., was less than impressed: &quot;COME ON APPLE,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/profile.jspa?userID=226505&quot;&gt;he wrote&lt;/a&gt; in a post last Wednesday on Apple&apos;s user forum. &quot;You introduced this bug about 48 hours ago, there is zero excuse for not having a fix or at the VERY least some announcement that a fix is coming.&quot; A user going by the name &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/profile.jspa?userID=828880&quot;&gt;MacPatty&lt;/a&gt; writes: &quot;Is anyone at Apple actually working on this problem or we all just talking to each other here. Does Apple know that they created a big problem for us?&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple&apos;s silence on security-related problems facing its rapidly expanding user base has been lagging a bit lately. More than four months ago, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/12/myspace_video_worm_pimps_adult_1.html&quot;&gt;computer worm that leveraged a design flaw in QuickTime&lt;/a&gt; spread rapidly to users of the social networking site &lt;strong&gt;MySpace.com&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/01/myspace_phishers_hook_hundreds.html&quot;&gt;stealing passwords&lt;/a&gt; from more than 100,000 users. The company responded by quietly &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/12/how_not_to_distribute_security_1.html&quot;&gt;issuing a patch designed just for MySpace users&lt;/a&gt;, which MySpace admins rolled out in a rather clumsy and insecure way. But Apple largely refused to talk to reporters about the whole incident, and it has yet to issue an advisory to let QuickTime users know whether they should be at all concerned about it, and if so what they can do to minimize their chances of being the next victim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, so maybe the largest share of QuickTime users are running &lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Windows&lt;/strong&gt;, and the MySpace worm didn&apos;t appear to do much more than steal MySpace logins. Still, this is an attack that could be replicated on other sites, with more serious consequences affecting both Mac and Apple users. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A question for Apple: Could you create a simple blog that offers suggestions or workarounds for high-profile problems affecting your customers, or at least assure users that you have heard their concerns and are investigating the problem?&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/12.html#a8765</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:03:34 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Don&apos;t Let OneCare Eat Your Email - AppScout</title>			<link>http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/dont_let_onecare_eat_your_emai.php</link>			<description>&lt;span id=&quot;intelliTXT&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whenever a program gets wide distributionthere are bound to be some users who, rightly or wrongly, feel it hascaused them pain. Sometimes it&apos;s a case of &lt;em&gt;post hoc ergo propter hoc&lt;/em&gt;(Latin for &quot;the hog was here, so the hog did it&quot;). Other times therereally is a problem, perhaps due to an unusual configuration or acompatibility problem with some less-common applications. But it&apos;s rarethat the problem is as serious and the response as limited as in thiscase. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A reader brought to my attention a thread in Microsoft&apos;s discussion forums for Windows OneCare titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsOneCare/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1150100&amp;amp;SiteID=2&quot;&gt;Outlook and Outlook Express Mail Store Missing or Quarantined&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.The thread started with a message in January and it&apos;s still runningtoday, with no clear resolution. In brief, if you get a virus in anemail message received by Outlook, OneCare&apos;s next virus sweep may &lt;strong&gt;quarantine or delete your entire email store&lt;/strong&gt;. If you receive a virus via Outlook Express OneCare may &lt;strong&gt;quarantine or delete the entire folder&lt;/strong&gt; containing the virus. Really! &lt;/p&gt;                              &lt;a name=&quot;more&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;        &lt;p&gt;Asthe thread goes on, more and more users weigh in reporting the problem.Moderators attempt soothing responses like &quot;Obviously, the action byOneCare is undesirable. However, you can ... exclude the Outlook PSTfile&quot; and &quot;I know it won&apos;t make you feel any better, but you&apos;re allreally helping to make OneCare a better program for everyone&quot; and &quot;Younever want email scanned on the way in or out of the system as itcauses more problems than it fixes.&quot; At one or two points themoderators announce a fix, but the problem reports keep coming in. Onemoderator mused that this had been a problem in the beta of OneCare1.0, but he hadn&apos;t seen it since then. Another suggested that version1.5 may have been coded from the wrong &quot;code branch&quot; of the base1.0/1.1 version. Hmm....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8764</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:08:23 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Windows Live OneCare Can Eat Your Email.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8763</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100769730/article.pl&quot;&gt;Windows Live OneCare Can Eat Your Email&lt;/a&gt;. FutureDomain writes in to point us to a blog sponsored by PC Magazine,reporting about another problem with Windows Live OneCare. Apparently,it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/dont_let_onecare_eat_your_emai.php&quot;&gt;sometimes deletes the entire Outlook or Outlook Express .PST mailbox&lt;/a&gt;when it finds a virus in one of the messages. The only solution is totell OneCare to exclude the entire Outlook mailbox. This is thesoftware that &lt;a href=&quot;http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/03/1412215&amp;amp;tid=109&quot;&gt;came in last in antivirus tests&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsOneCare/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1150100&amp;amp;SiteID=2&quot;&gt;trail of tears is ongoing&lt;/a&gt; over on the Microsoft forums. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8763</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:04:30 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>SSL optimization over the WAN needs scrutiny - Network World</title>			<link>http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/030807-ssl-optimization.html</link>			<description> Rather than passing through SSL sessions between clients and servers located in remote data centers, some WAN optimization gear can terminate the SSL sessions, shrink the traffic and re-encrypt it for the next leg of the trip. These chains of encrypted sessions introduce potential vulnerabilities that different vendors address in different ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;SSL traffic represents a growing percentage of total traffic on WANlinks, according to Forrester Research. So SSL support in WANoptimization appliances will become more important to businesses thatwant to keep traffic secure while minimizing the size of their WANlinks. &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;p&gt;In a survey last month of 1,300 IT executives by WAN-optimization vendor &lt;a xmlns:o=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/office&quot; xmlns:st1=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/smarttags&quot; xmlns:w=&quot;urn:www.microsoft.com/word&quot; href=&quot;http://www.bluecoat.com&quot;&gt;Blue Coat Systems&lt;/a&gt;, one-third of respondents said that 25% of their WAN traffic is SSL. And of those surveyed, 45% plan to roll out more SSL                        applications this year.                     &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;p&gt;Abouta third of all WAN traffic at Richardson Partners Financial Ltd. inToronto is SSL, says Andrew McKinney, director of technical servicesfor the firm. But if only the urgent business traffic is considered,the percentage is much higher. &quot;For critical business traffic, it&apos;s allencrypted,&quot; he says. So he uses Blue Coat Systems gear to securetraffic and optimize it for good performance. &lt;/p&gt;                     &lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8762</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:45:40 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>SSL Optimization Over WAN Needs Scrutiny.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8761</link>			<description>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100800112/article.pl&quot;&gt;SSL Optimization Over WAN Needs Scrutiny&lt;/a&gt;. coondoggie writes with word of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/030807-ssl-optimization.html&quot;&gt;expansion of WAN optimization appliances to handle SSL traffic &lt;/a&gt;and the security concerns this brings up. From the article: &quot;With more and more WAN optimization vendors extending their capabilities to include encrypted traffic, corporate IT executives have a decision to make: Should they trust the security these devices provide? Rather than passing through SSL sessions between clients and servers located in remote data centers, some WAN optimization gear can terminate the SSL sessions, shrink the traffic, and re-encrypt it for the next leg of the trip. These chains of encrypted sessions introduce potential vulnerabilities that different vendors address in different ways. SSL traffic represents a growing percentage of total traffic on WAN links, according to Forrester Research. So SSL support in WAN optimization appliances will become more important to businesses that want to keep traffic secure while minimizing the size of their WAN links.&quot; &lt;br&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8761</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:41:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Connecticut Wants to Restrict Social Networking.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8751</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100636508/article.pl&quot;&gt;Connecticut Wants to Restrict Social Networking&lt;/a&gt;. csefft writes &quot;According to the Hartford Courant, Connecticut became the latest state to want to restrict the use of MySpace and other social networking sites. The proposed bill would require that all such sites &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-myspace0309.artmar09,0,1936412.story&quot;&gt;verify the identity and age of users&lt;/a&gt;, as well as get parent&apos;s permission for those under 18. Sites that failed to comply would be subject to a $5,000 per day fine. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said of the proposition, &apos;If we can put a man on the moon, we can verify age on the Internet,&apos; but quickly followed with the acknowledgment that there is no foolproof method.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8751</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:06:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Don&apos;t like ID cards? Hand over your passport | the Daily Mail</title>			<link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;ito=newsnow</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody who objects to their personal details going on the new &quot;BigBrother&quot; ID cards database will be banned from having a passport.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James Hall, the official in charge of the supposedly-voluntaryscheme, said the Government would allow people to opt out - but inreturn they must &quot;forgo the ability&quot; to have a travel document.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With one in every eight people saying they will refuse tosign-up, up to five million adults could effectively be refusedpermission to leave the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Campaigners reacted to Mr Hall&apos;s remarks with fury, saying theywere yet more evidence of the lurch towards &quot;Big Brother&quot; Britain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Phil Booth, of the NO2ID group, said: &quot;The idea that ID cards scheme is voluntary, and people can opt-out, is a joke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;There are all sorts of reasons why people need to travel, not just for holidays. There is work, visiting relatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;What are these people supposed to do? It stretches thedefinition of voluntary beyond breaking point. They will go to anylength to get personal information for this huge database. Who knowswhat will happen to it then?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8750</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:56:16 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8749</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100791998/article.pl&quot;&gt;No Passport For Britons Refusing Mass Surveillance&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waronfreedom.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UpnAtom&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;People who refuse to give up their &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6370627.stm&quot;&gt;bank records&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristol-no2id.org.uk/blog/?page_id=5&quot;&gt;tax records &amp;amp; details of any benefits they&apos;ve claimed&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article334686.ece&quot;&gt;records of their car movements for the last year&lt;/a&gt;, or refuse to submit to an interrogation on whether they are the same person that this mountain of data belongs to -- will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441329&amp;amp;in_page_id=1770&amp;amp;ito=newsnow&quot;&gt;denied passports&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.no2id.net/viewtopic.php?t=14792&quot;&gt;March 26th&lt;/a&gt;.The Blair government has already admitted that this and other data willbe cross-linked so that the Home Office and other officials can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1993055,00.html&quot;&gt;spy on the everyday lives of innocent Britons&lt;/a&gt;. Britons were already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-545269&quot;&gt;the most spied upon nation in Western Europe&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/09/1823255&amp;amp;tid=158&quot;&gt;more so even than Sweden&lt;/a&gt;.Data-mining through this unprecedented level of mass-surveillanceallows any future British government to leapfrog even countries likeChina and North Korea.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/11.html#a8749</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:52:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice Department Says F.B.I. Misused Patriot Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/10.html#a8743</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/09/justice-department-says-fbi-misused-patriot-act/&quot;&gt;Justice Department Says F.B.I. Misused Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;In what should not come as that big of a surprise, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070309/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters&quot;&gt;AP reports&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And for three years the FBI underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]The audit by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine found that FBI agents sometimes demanded personal data on individuals without proper authorization. The 126-page audit also found the FBI improperly obtained telephone records in non-emergency circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]Fine[base &apos;]s annual review is required by Congress, over the objections of the Bush administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The audit released Friday found that the number of national security letters issued by the FBI skyrocketed in the years after the Patriot Act became law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2000, for example, the FBI issued an estimated 8,500 letters. By 2003, however, that number jumped to 39,000. It rose again the next year, to about 56,000 letters in 2004, and dropped to approximately 47,000 in 2005.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over the entire three-year period, the FBI reported issuing 143,074 national security letters requesting customer data from businesses, the audit found. But that did not include an additional 8,850 requests that were never recorded in the FBI[base &apos;]s database, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]The FBI also used so-called [OE][base &apos;]exigent letters,&apos;[base &apos;] signed by officials at FBI headquarters who were not authorized to sign national security letters, to obtain information. In at least 700 cases, these exigent letters were sent to three telephone companies to get toll billing records and subscriber information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[OE][base &apos;]In many cases, there was no pending investigation associated with the request at the time the exigent letters were sent,&apos;[base &apos;] the audit concluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unbelievable. The full 199-page report can be downloaded &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/images/doj_fbiletters_032007.pdf&quot;&gt;here (PDF)&lt;/a&gt;. And more coverage is available at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2007/03/09/doj_fbi_misused_patr.html&quot;&gt;Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/fbi_misuses_und.html&quot;&gt;27B Stroke 6&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/10.html#a8743</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:49:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/10.html#a8741</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000215.html&quot;&gt;Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings. The release of a new report detailing massive FBI abusesof the PATRIOT Act (particularly in regard to National SecurityLetters), now confirms concerns that I and others have been longexpressing about the potential abuse of retained Internet and otherdata, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000175.html&quot;&gt;Sounding the Alarm on Government-Mandated Data Retention&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/google-privacy-initiative&quot;&gt;An Open Letter to Google:  Concepts for a Google Privacy Initiative&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Broad abuses of retained data are now demonstrated to be real, not theoretical, as described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902353.html&quot;&gt;this Washington Post story&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don&apos;t yet really know the full extent of these violations, butwhat has already been revealed is bad enough as a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that these events will not only trigger considerablesoul-searching by those firms who voluntarily retain user activitydata, but also cause a renewed recognition of how broad mandated dataretention can facilitate, and inevitably will facilitate, such abusesin the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Lauren--&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/&quot;&gt;Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/10.html#a8741</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:43:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://lauren.vortex.com/index.rdf">Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Open-source ID project awaits Microsoft&apos;s blessing | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Open-source+ID+project+awaits+Microsofts+blessing/2100-7344_3-6165850.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;An open-source rival to a Microsoft identity tool has been in limbofor months, awaiting the software giant&apos;s go-ahead on certainpatent-related issues. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Developers working on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Microsofts+InfoCard+draws+open-source+response/2100-7355_3-6043360.html&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft&apos;s InfoCard draws open-source response -- Sunday, Feb 26, 2006&quot;&gt;Higgins project&lt;/a&gt; want to create a tool equivalent to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Ending+Microsofts+identity+crisis/2008-1029_3-6040281.html&quot; title=&quot;Ending Microsoft&apos;s identity crisis -- Thursday, Feb 16, 2006&quot;&gt;Microsoft&apos;s Windows CardSpace&lt;/a&gt;,but fear the software giant&apos;s legal wrath if they don&apos;t receivepermission on certain features. Although parts of the project continueto move forward, proponents say it may not reach its full potentialwithout Microsoft&apos;s help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &quot;There are some pieces that we would not be able to releasethat we would like to,&quot; Mary Ruddy, a Higgins project leader, saidThursday. &quot;We want to make sure that the intellectual property for allof our open-source projects is really clean, so that people can feelconfident about using our code.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; In September, Microsoft pledged not to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Microsoft+gives+go-ahead+to+open-source+Web+services/2100-7344_3-6115204.html&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft gives go-ahead to open-source Web services -- Wednesday, Sep 13, 2006&quot;&gt;assert its patents pertaining to nearly three dozen Web services specifications&lt;/a&gt;.That did help the Higgins project, but developers say that wasn&apos;tenough to help them deliver all the features they hope to. They haveasked Microsoft to provide guarantees that it won&apos;t sue on other partsof its intellectual property. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8740</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:42:06 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Open-Source ID Project Awaits Microsoft&apos;s Blessing.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8739</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100555760/article.pl&quot;&gt;Open-Source ID Project Awaits Microsoft&apos;s Blessing&lt;/a&gt;. An anonymous reader writes to mention that an open-source &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Open-source+ID+project+awaits+Microsofts+blessing/2100-7344_3-6165850.html&quot;&gt;alternative to Microsoft&apos;s CardSpace&lt;/a&gt; tool has been on hold for months while they await patent blessing from the Redmond software giant. &quot;While CardSpace is available on Windows, one goal of the Higgins project is to cover other operating systems. Higgins wants to offer an open-source alternative that works on Windows and on alternatives such as Linux and Mac OS X. The application would work similarly to CardSpace.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8739</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:39:39 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice: FBI misused Patriot Act powers - Yahoo! News</title>			<link>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE</link>			<description>The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday.&lt;p&gt;And for three years the FBI underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who oversees the FBI, described the problems cited in the report as unacceptable and left open the possibility of criminal charges. He ordered further investigation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&quot;Once we get that information, we&apos;ll be in a better position to assess what kinds of steps should be taken,&quot; Gonzales told reporters following a speech to privacy officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI also used so-called &quot;exigent letters,&quot; signed by officials atFBI headquarters who were not authorized to sign national securityletters, to obtain information. In at least 700 cases, these exigentletters were sent to three telephone companies to get toll billingrecords and subscriber information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;In many cases, there was no pending investigation associatedwith the request at the time the exigent letters were sent,&quot; the auditconcluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a letter to Fine, Gonzales asked the inspector general toissue a follow-up audit in July on whether the FBI had followedrecommendations to fix the problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;To say that I am concerned about what has been revealed inthis report would be an enormous understatement,&quot; Gonzales told theprivacy officials. &quot;Failure to adequately protect information privacysimply is a failure to do our jobs.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senators outraged over the conclusions signaled they would provide tougher oversight of the FBI -- and perhaps limit its power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The report indicates abuse of the authority&quot; Congress gave the FBI, said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Patrick%20Leahy%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=1174vafan/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=592&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11g49da8m/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=592&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Vt. &quot;You cannot have people act as free agents on something where they&apos;re going to be delving into your privacy.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The committee&apos;s top Republican, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Arlen%20Specter%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117p02ae7/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=497&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gg4hb20/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=497&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;),said the FBI appears to have &quot;badly misused national security letters.&quot;The senator said, &quot;This is, regrettably, part of an ongoing processwhere the federal authorities are not really sensitive to privacy andgo far beyond what we have authorized.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Russ Feingold (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Russ%20Feingold%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117l228rs/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=629&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gobi8e5/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=629&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Wis., another member on the panel that oversees the FBI, said the report &quot;proves that &apos;trust us&apos; doesn&apos;t cut it.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The American Civil Liberties Union said the audit proves Congress must amend the Patriot Act to require judicial approval anytime the FBI wants access to sensitive personal information. &quot;The Attorney General and the FBI are part of the problem and they cannot be trusted to be part of the solution,&quot; said Anthony D. Romero, the ACLU&apos;s executive director.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8738</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:34:53 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8737</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100579673/article.pl&quot;&gt;Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt;. happyslayer writes to mention that according to Yahoo! News a recent audit shows that the FBI has improperly and in some cases &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE&quot;&gt;illegally utilized the Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt; to obtain information. &quot;The audit by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine found that FBI agents sometimes demanded personal data on individuals without proper authorization. The 126-page audit also found the FBI improperly obtained telephone records in non-emergency circumstances. The audit blames agent error and shoddy record-keeping for the bulk of the problems and did not find any indication of criminal misconduct. Still, &apos;we believe the improper or illegal uses we found involve serious misuses of national security letter authorities,&apos; the audit concludes.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8737</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:27:43 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Local - Olofsson claims Sweden has tapped phones &apos;for decades&apos;</title>			<link>http://www.thelocal.se/6645/20070309/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Deputy prime minister &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/search.php?keywordSearch=Maud_Olofsson&quot; class=&quot;nodec&quot;&gt;Maud Olofsson&lt;/a&gt;has added a new twist to Sweden&apos;s divisive surveillance debate. TheCentre Party leader claims that defence minister Mikael Odenberg&apos;sproposed legislation would merely codify practices that have alreadybeen in operation for decades. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Previously, at a time when all telecommunications were state-operated, Sweden&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/search.php?keywordSearch=National_Defence_Radio_Establishment&quot; class=&quot;nodec&quot;&gt;National Defence Radio Establishment&lt;/a&gt; (F&amp;Atilde;&amp;#182;rsvarets Radioanstalt - FRA) regularly tapped telephone lines in and out of the country, says Olofsson. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8736</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:23:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Blotter(ABC NEWS) - Exclusive: Report Says FBI Violated Patriot Act Guidelines</title>			<link>http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/exclusive_repor.html</link>			<description>The FBI repeatedly failed to follow the strict guidelines of thePatriot Act when its agents took advantage of a new provision allowingthe FBI to obtain phone and financial records without a court order,according to a report to be made public Friday by the JusticeDepartment&apos;s Inspector General.&lt;p&gt;The report, in classified and unclassified versions, remains closelyheld, but Washington officials who have seen it tell ABC News itdocuments &quot;numerous lapses&quot; and describe it as &quot;scathing&quot; and &quot;not apretty picture for the FBI.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FBI Director Robert Mueller is scheduled to brief Congress on the report at noon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The officials say the inspector general found the FBI underreportedby at least 20 percent the use of the controversial provision, known asNational Security Letters, NSLs, in required disclosures to Congress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Patriot Act gave FBI agents the ability to demand telephone,bank, credit card and library records by issuing an administrativeletter, bypassing the need to seek a warrant from a federal judge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8731</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:02:02 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>DNS Attack Factsheet Released. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8729</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104325&amp;amp;ti=DNS+Attack+Factsheet+Released&quot;&gt;DNS Attack Factsheet Released&lt;/a&gt;. Hoped to be first in a series. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8729</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:30:25 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Malware with Rootkit Features Grows. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8728</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104324&amp;amp;ti=Malware+with+Rootkit+Features+Grows&quot;&gt;Malware with Rootkit Features Grows&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Rootkit techniques are becoming increasingly popular among malware creators.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8728</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:49 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Policy Makers call for University Internet Filters.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8726</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/%7Er/publicknowledge-main/%7E3/100352631/858&quot;&gt;Policy Makers call for University Internet Filters&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;At today[base &apos;]s House Judiciary &lt;a href=&quot;http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=280&quot;&gt;Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property hearing&lt;/a&gt;, titled [base &quot;]An Update - Piracy on University Networks,[per thou] we heard from legislators that they[base &apos;]re very concerned about [base &quot;]piracy[per thou] on campus networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://boss.streamos.com/real/judiciary/courts/courts030807.smi&quot;&gt;You should be able to watch the video of the hearing here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;The common theme of the solutions was not only educating students (which all of the witnesses said that they were working on collaboratively), but for campuses to employ technology to filter the packets flowing over the network.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/858&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/%7Er/publicknowledge-main/%7E4/100352631&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org&quot;&gt;Public Knowledge - Blogging, Events, and Action Alerts&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8726</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:16:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/publicknowledge-main">Public Knowledge - Blogging, Events, and Action Alerts</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Shred Your Data to Stay Ahead of the Pack. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8724</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/100525855/article.html&quot;&gt;Shred Your Data to Stay Ahead of the Pack&lt;/a&gt;. IBM&apos;s chief scientist has developed a data sharing system that hides what that data contains--by shredding it. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8724</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:09:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Crash-Testing a Killer Bot. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8722</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/in_late_2004_th.html&quot;&gt;Crash-Testing a Killer Bot&lt;/a&gt;. Israel rolls out a tiny, Uzi-toting robot. But what happens when the armed equivalent of the Blue Screen of Death occurs? In Danger Room. In Danger Room. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/09.html#a8722</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:57:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>State Eyes Age Checks for MySpace. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8717</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/100129072/MYSPACE_DANGERS&quot;&gt;State Eyes Age Checks for MySpace&lt;/a&gt;. Connecticut legislators want to force social-networking sites to verify users&apos; ages and lock down parents&apos; permission before minors can post personal profiles. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8717</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:36:59 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Now on the menu at Ruby Tuesday: Better security.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8716</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/100340914/article.do&quot;&gt;Now on the menu at Ruby Tuesday: Better security&lt;/a&gt;. Spurred by the growing list of data breaches that have plagued other companies in recent years, restaurant chain Ruby Tuesday is moving to strengthen its credit card security efforts. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8716</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:30:36 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Image Gallery: Seven ways to keep your search history private. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8715</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9012082&amp;amp;source=rss_topic84&quot;&gt;Image Gallery: Seven ways to keep your search history private&lt;/a&gt;. Worried that Google and other search sites know too much about you -- and that the federal government can subpoena that data? Fear not -- we&apos;ve got seven steps you can follow to keep your search history to yourself. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8715</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:22:29 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Managing Access to Critical Data for Protection and Privacy. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8714</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99786147/whitepapers.do&quot;&gt;Managing Access to Critical Data for Protection and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;b&gt;(Source: Symantec)&lt;/b&gt;  One common mistake that organizations make is by using Identity management solutions in isolation. Doing so risks access inflation, workarounds and coverage gaps. This white paper shows how comprehensive access management deploys identity management within a framework that includes disciplines for data protection, integration with hiring and promotion, and especially monitoring. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8714</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:18:13 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security revives supersnoop - The Washington Times</title>			<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070308-124323-4382r.htm</link>			<description>Homeland Security officials are testing a supersnoop computer system that sifts through personal information on U.S. citizens to detect possible terrorist attacks, prompting concerns from lawmakers who have called for investigations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The system uses the same data-mining process that was developed by the Pentagon&apos;s Total Information Awareness (TIA) project that was banned by Congress in 2003 because of vast privacy violations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of the project called ADVISE -- Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement -- was requested by Rep. David R. Obey, Wisconsin Democrat and chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The investigation focuses on whether the program violates privacy laws, and the findings will be released after completion of the Iraq war supplemental spending bill, possibly as early as this week, a panel aide said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ADVISE and TIA data-mining projects rely on personal data to track individual behavior and consumer transactions to develop computer algorithms that create a pattern that some behavioral scientists say can predict terrorist behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Privacy concerns prompted lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to introduce legislation in January to require that government agencies disclose data-mining practices in regular reports to Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;A serious discussion on the implications of data-mining programs is long overdue,&quot; Sen. Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat and a sponsor of the bill, said yesterday. Sen. John E. Sununu, New Hampshire Republican, is also a bill sponsor.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8711</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:21:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>FCW.com News - Census Bureau accidentally exposes personal data</title>			<link>http://www.fcw.com/article97859-03-08-07-Web</link>			<description>&lt;span class=&quot;storybody&quot;&gt;The Census Bureau accidentally posted personalinformation on 302 households on a public server several times sinceOctober 2006, officials said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The personal information,including names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, family incomeranges and other demographic data, was contained in a file that wasplaced on a public server for the purposes of testing new softwareapplications. The file included about 250 fake accounts in addition tothe real information. The bureau found out about the mistake when itfound the file on the server in mid-February.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8708</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:04:50 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>heise Security - All Microsoft updates phone home</title>			<link>http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86429</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Possibly as a reaction to heise Security&apos;s report that Windows Genuine Advantage Notification sends back data to Redmond even when users choose to terminate its installation, a Microsoft developer using the pseudonym alexkoc has now posted an entry in the WGA blog. There he reveals that every update that flows through Windows Update at the very least informs Microsoft about whether the installation was successful or not. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://update.microsoft.com/windowsupdate/v6/privacy.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Privacy Statement&lt;/a&gt; of Windows Update Microsoft grants itself fairly far-reaching rights. Thus the information collected by the Redmond-based behemoth includes the computer make and model, version information for the operating system, browser, and any other Microsoft software for which updates might be available, Plug&amp;amp;Play ID numbers of hardware devices, region and language setting, Globally Unique Identifier (GUID), Product ID and Product Key, BIOS name, revision number, and revision date. By way of justifying Microsoft&apos;s approach, alexkoc writes that the EULA, likewise presented by the WGA installer, also covered the relaying of such information. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With some updates such as the WGA Notification, the installer transmits data that Microsoft says it merely requires for quality control purposes and to improve the installer itself. The WGA package thus, among other things, sends back an event code. To calm the fears of users, alexkoc presents a graphic explaining the various fields of such a data packet. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When the product IDs and product keys found belong to legal software, Microsoft will delete the data right away; only in cases of suspected software piracy will it store the data, the company has said. In the blog, the company once again explicitly states that it does not use the information gathered to identify or contact users. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8706</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:54:34 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Vishing: Dialing for Dollars, Part II.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8703</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/vishing_dialing_for_dollars_pa_1.html&quot;&gt;Vishing: Dialing for Dollars, Part II&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Security Fix&lt;/strong&gt; received a copy of a new scam e-mail targeting &lt;strong&gt;Bank of America&lt;/strong&gt; customers that is likely to con quite a few folks before it is shut down. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, Bank of America is hit by this sort of thing all the time. It&apos;s the fourth most popular target for &quot;phishing&quot; scams that use e-mail to lure people into giving away their data at counterfeit sites, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phishtank.com/stats/2007/02/&quot;&gt;stats just released&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;PhishTank&lt;/strong&gt;. But this is one of the more convincing voice phishing or &quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishing&quot;&gt;vishing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; attacks I&apos;ve seen yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vishing scams start with an e-mail lure that asks the recipient to call a specific 1-800 number to settle some matter with his or her account. The numbers usually are connected to an automated system that asks the caller to key in data from a credit card -- the 16-digit account number, the expiration date and the three-digit security code on the back. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This new Bank of America scam has the same elements, but its execution is nearly flawless (unlike the majority of previous vishing scams Security Fix has seen, which either bungle the voice mail system or use a lure full of poor spelling and grammar). It informs the recipient that his account has been suspended because it was used to purchase &quot;obscene or certain sexually oriented goods or services.&quot; From the e-mail: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;We are hereby notifying you that, after a recent review of your account activity, it has been determined that you are in violation of Bank of America&apos;s Acceptable Use Policy. Therefore, your account has been temporarily limited for: hotjasmin.com cam shows. In order to remove the limit please call our TOLL FREE number [omitted].&quot;&lt;/em&gt; That domain is registered to a guy in the Netherlands, but it&apos;s currently inactive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recorded a short snippet of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/rec0308-081041.mp3&quot;&gt;first 45 seconds or so&lt;/a&gt; of the automated phone message used in this attack. If the you enter the requested information, the voice then asks for your bank PIN: &quot;Bank of America asks for your PIN in order to verify your identity. This also enables us to  assist federal authorities in order to prevent money laundering and other illegal activities.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Generally, it&apos;s a good idea not to even dial these bogus 1-800 numbers, as you&apos;re essentially giving the scammers your phone number, a key piece of your personal data. It&apos;s also a good idea to be very suspicious of e-mails that ask you to call any number. When in doubt, open up a browser Window and find the official Web site of your financial institution, then look up the customer-service number listed there. &lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8703</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:41:03 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Patch Reprieve for March&apos;s Black Tuesday.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8702</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/patch_reprieve_for_marchs_blac.html&quot;&gt;Patch Reprieve for March&apos;s Black Tuesday&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows&lt;/strong&gt; PC users and corporate system administrators worldwide will earn a reprieve from Redmond next week. &lt;strong&gt;Microsoft&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/advance.mspx&quot;&gt;said today&lt;/a&gt; it has no plans to release new software security updates this month. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s not as if there aren&apos;t any &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.eeye.com/html/alerts/zeroday/index.html&quot;&gt;outstanding security flaws&lt;/a&gt; that Microsoft could fix this month, but the situation could be a lot worse. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps Redmond is simply being kind to corporate IT folk, many of whom are working hard to update their companies&apos; software and hardware for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/02/AR2007030201346.html?nav=rss_technology&quot;&gt;early &lt;strong&gt;daylight saving&lt;/strong&gt; switch&lt;/a&gt; this weekend: For the first time in 20 years, daylight saving time will not start on the first Sunday in April. Instead, it will begin three weeks earlier, at 2 a.m. on the second Sunday in March, the 11th. Our IT staff has sent numerous e-mails to laptop users to drop by and make sure the Macs and PCs are all up to date. (&lt;strong&gt;Apple&lt;/strong&gt; and Microsoft have already pushed out patches to address this issue, and if you&apos;ve been keeping up to date with them, you should be fine, but Windows users can &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/dst2007&quot;&gt;consult this page&lt;/a&gt; to be sure.) By the way, updates are available to  fix this shift for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palm.com/us/support/downloads/dst.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Palm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/daylightsaving/default.mspx&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows Mobile&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; PDAs. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Normally, Microsoft plugs security holes in its software on the second Tuesday of every month, also known as &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Patch Tuesday&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;  Microsoft moved to a regular patch cycle a few years ago to make it more predictable for companies who need to staff or schedule extra IT personnel to test and deploy the updates to what could be thousands of systems. The system administrators to whom that task falls typically dread the monthly chore and have a different name for it: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Black Tuesday&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s been a while since Windows users have been given a pass on patches. By my count, the last time Microsoft skipped a cycle was &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2005/09/microsoft_nixes_patch_for_blac_1.html&quot;&gt;back in September 2005&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8702</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:03:31 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>No Microsoft Security Updates Coming Mext Week.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8697</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/100336510/article.html&quot;&gt;No Microsoft Security Updates Coming Mext Week&lt;/a&gt;. In one of only a handful of times since 2003, Microsoft won&apos;t have security patches available next week. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8697</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:40:55 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>How Computers Can Make Voting More Secure.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8694</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1130&quot;&gt;How Computers Can Make Voting More Secure&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;By now there is overwhelming evidence that today[base &apos;]s paperless computer-based voting technologies have such serious security and reliability problems that we should not be using them.   Computers can[base &apos;]t do the job by themselves; but what role should they play in voting?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It[base &apos;]s tempting to eliminate computers entirely, returning to old-fashioned paper voting, but I think this is a mistake.  Paper has an important role, as I[base &apos;]ll describe below, but paper systems are subject to well-known problems such as ballot-box stuffing and &lt;a href=&quot;http://vote.nist.gov/threats/papers/ChainVoting.pdf&quot;&gt;chain voting&lt;/a&gt;, as well as other user-interface and logistical challenges.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Security does require some role for paper.   Each vote must be recorded in a manner that is directly verified by the voter.  And the system must be software-independent, meaning that its accuracy cannot rely on the correct functioning of any software system.   Today[base &apos;]s paperless e-voting systems satisfy neither requirement, and the only practical way to meet the requirements is to use paper.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The proper role for computers, then, is to backstop the paper system, to improve it.  What we want is not a computerized voting system, but a computer-&lt;i&gt;augmented&lt;/i&gt; one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This mindset changes how we think about the role of computers.  Instead of trying to make computers do everything, we will look instead for weaknesses and gaps in the paper system, and ask how computers can plug them.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are two main ways computers can help.  The first is in helping voters cast their votes.  Computers can check for errors in ballots, for example by detecting an invalid ballot while the voter is still in a position to fix it.  Computers can present the ballot in audio format for the blind or illiterate, or in multiple languages.  (Of course, badly designed computer interfaces can do harm, so we have to be careful.)  There must be a voter-verified paper record at the end of the vote-casting process, but computers, used correctly, can help voters create and validate that record, by acting as ballot-marking devices or as scanners to help voters spot mismarked ballots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The second way computers can help is by improving security.  Usually the e-voting security debate is about how to keep computers from making security too much worse than it was before.  Given the design of today[base &apos;]s e-voting systems, this is appropriate [~] just bringing these systems up to the level of security and reliability in (say) the Xbox and Wii game consoles would be nice.   Even in a computer-augmented system, we[base &apos;]ll need to do a better job of vetting the computers[base &apos;] design [~] if a job is worth doing with a computer, it[base &apos;]s worth doing correctly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But once we adopt the mindset of augmenting a paper-based system, security looks less like a problem and more like an opportunity.  We can look for the security weaknesses of paper-based systems, and ask how computers can help to address them.  For example, paper-based systems are subject to ballot-box stuffing [~] how can computers reduce this risk?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surprisingly, the designs of current e-voting technologies, even the ones with paper trails, don[base &apos;]t do all they can to compensate for the weaknesses of paper.  For example, the current systems I[base &apos;]ve seen keep electronic records that are subject to straightforward post-election tampering.   Researchers have studied approaches to this problem, but as far as I know none are used in practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In future posts, we[base &apos;]ll discuss design ideas for computer-augmented voting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1130&amp;amp;akst_action=share-this&quot; title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; id=&quot;akst_link_1130&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com&quot;&gt;Freedom to Tinker&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/08.html#a8694</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:35:06 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?feed=rss2">Freedom to Tinker</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WGA Reports Back To MS Even If You Choose Not To Install - Aviran&apos;s Place</title>			<link>http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Heise online &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2F85884&amp;amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;on a very interesting action Microsoft is taking during the installation of WGA. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt;to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel theinstallation, the setup program will send your info and the fact thatyou choose not to install WGA back to their servers.&lt;/p&gt;In addition to that it seems that the setup program send someinformation stored in your registry to &lt;a href=&quot;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&lt;/a&gt;.While it does not specifically identify the user, it looks like it doessend some identification of your computer and Windows version (seepicture) to Microsoft servers.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8693</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:06:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8692</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100015015/article.pl&quot;&gt;Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No&lt;/a&gt;. Aviran writes &quot;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided NOT to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel the installation, the setup program &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/&quot;&gt;will send information stored in your registry&lt;/a&gt; and the fact that you choose not to install WGA back to Microsoft&apos;s servers.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8692</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Malware Increased 172 Percent in 2006, According to Report. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8686</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104265&amp;amp;ti=Malware+Increased+172+Percent+in+2006%2C+According+to+Report&quot;&gt;Malware Increased 172 Percent in 2006, According to Report&lt;/a&gt;. Amount of malware detected in 2006 same as past 15 years, combined. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8686</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:57:37 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Patient control of EHR data on network gets mixed reaction</title>			<link>http://govhealthit.com/article97834-03-06-07-Web</link>			<description>The Health and Human Services Department has received mixed reviews forits decision to insist that the next iteration of the Nationwide HealthInformation Network (NHIN) allow patients to control who sees theirelectronic health records on the network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Robert Kolodner,interim national coordinator of health information technology, saidMarch 1 that trial networks funded by his office should give &quot;peoplethe capability to decide how they view, store and control access totheir own information. A person could say how that information flows tospecific entities or completely block the flow of information.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Ifthey do what they say, it&apos;s a tremendous thing for privacy,&quot; said Dr.Deborah Peel, founder of the Patient Privacy Rights Foundation. &quot;It&apos;sexactly what we&apos;ve been talking about for a long time.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peelsaid she talked with Kolodner and learned that he wants to givepatients the ability to control what happens to their healthinformation, &quot;down to the data field level.&quot; &quot;I think his intentionsare fantastic,&quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Asked whether such a network would betechnically feasible, Peel said the existing technology would supportthat degree of granularity in controlling the flow of EHR data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ButMark Rothstein, director of the Institute for Bioethics, Health Policyand Law at the University of Louisville School of Medicine, said hedoubts the HHS move will make a difference. &quot;I don&apos;t really have a lotof confidence that it would really have any effect whatsoever,&quot; saidRothstein, a member of the official National Committee on Vital andHealth Statistics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason Rothstein was less thanenthusiastic about the HHS move: Privacy problems are primarily policyand legal issues in his view, not technology-based. Rothstein recentlytestified before a Senate subcommittee, criticizing HHS for failing totackle privacy and other policy issues associated with development ofthe NHIN. Kolodner&apos;s announcement doesn&apos;t address many of the policyquestions, he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kolodner&apos;s office &quot;has indicated no priorinterest in this concept,&quot; Rothstein said, suggesting that there is noway to know how committed HHS is to its plans. Others have pointed outit is one of the first HHS health IT initiatives that deviates fromplans outlined by Kolodner&apos;s predecessor, Dr. David Brailer.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8685</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:56:32 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Wal-Mart fires technician who recorded phone calls</title>			<link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012319</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;March 05, 2007 &amp;nbsp;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(Reuters)&lt;/a&gt;-- CHICAGO - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said today it fired a systemstechnician for intercepting text messages of people who were notWal-Mart employees and for recording telephone conversations with a &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; reporter without authorization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart, the world&apos;s largest retailer, said an internalinvestigation found the technician had monitored and recorded phonecalls between Wal-Mart public relations employees and a New York TimesCo. reporter between September and January.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer also said the technician, whoworked in its information systems division, intercepted and stored textmessages that contained certain key words, including those sent bypeople in the Bentonville area who were not Wal-Mart employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart spokeswoman Mona Williams said on a call with reporters that the technician &quot;did this on his own.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While interviews with the technician gave the retailer an idea as towhy he recorded the calls, Williams said she could not disclose thereasons because the case has been turned over to federal investigators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8684</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:52:20 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?  </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8683</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99782770/article.do&quot;&gt;Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Does the Wal-Mart eavesdropping debacle have the potential to be this year&apos;s HP scandal? A former IT security staffer for the retailer evaluates what might have happened. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8683</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:37 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Texas House exempts courthouse clerks from privacy laws.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8681</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99802862/article.do&quot;&gt;Texas House exempts courthouse clerks from privacy laws&lt;/a&gt;. The Texas House of Representatives has approved a bill that would allow local courthouse clerks  to disclose &quot;in the ordinary course of business&quot; Social Security numbers contained in public records maintained by their offices. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8681</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:43:07 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Crack! Security expert hacks RFID in UK passport.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8680</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99829740/article.do&quot;&gt;Crack! Security expert hacks RFID in UK passport&lt;/a&gt;. The British government says that forgery of their new biometric passports is inconceivable, but a security expert has demonstrated a successful crack of the embedded RFID chip and its info. And he did it without taking the document out of its mailing envelope. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/07.html#a8680</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:41:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Your Wi-Fi can tell people a lot about you | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;ARLINGTON, Va.--Simply booting up a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop can tellpeople sniffing wireless network traffic a lot about your computer--andabout you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Soon after a computer powers up, it starts looking for wirelessnetworks and network services. Even if the wireless hardware is thenshut-off, a snoop may already have caught interesting data. Much moreinformation can be &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Insecure+networks+could+lead+to+lawsuits/2009-1033_3-940460.html&quot; title=&quot;Insecure networks could lead to lawsuits -- Monday, Jul 1, 2002&quot;&gt;plucked out of the air&lt;/a&gt; if the computer is connected to an access point, in particular an access point without security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &quot;You&apos;re leaking all kinds of information that an attacker can use,&quot;David Maynor, chief technology officer at Errata Security, saidThursday in a presentation at the Black Hat DC event here. &quot;If thegovernment was taking this information from you, people would be up inarms. Yet you&apos;re leaking this voluntarily using your laptop at theairport.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; There are many tools that let anyone &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Wi-Fi+group+backs+brawnier+security+standard/2100-7351_3-5342824.html&quot; title=&quot;Wi-Fi group backs brawnier security standard -- Wednesday, Sep 1, 2004&quot;&gt;listen in on wireless network traffic&lt;/a&gt;.These tools can capture information such as usernames and passwords fore-mail accounts and instant message tools as well as data entered intounsecured Web sites. At the annual Defcon hacker gathering, a &quot;wall ofsheep&quot; always &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2300-1029_3-6102806-1.html&quot; title=&quot;Photos: Hacking at Defcon -- Monday, Aug 7, 2006&quot;&gt;lists captured log-in credentials&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Errata has developed another network sniffer that looks fortraffic using 25 protocols, including those for the popular instantmessage clients as well as DHCP, SNMP, DNS and HTTP. This means thesniffer will capture requests for network addresses, network managementtools, Web sites queries, Web traffic and more. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8678</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:20:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>A Network Sniffer On Steroids.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8677</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99790580/article.pl&quot;&gt;A Network Sniffer On Steroids&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QuantumCrypto&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Errata has developed &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html&quot;&gt;a new network sniffer&lt;/a&gt;,dubbed &apos;Ferret,&apos; that looks for traffic using 25 protocols, includingthose for the popular instant message clients as well as DHCP, SNMP,DNS and HTTP. This means the sniffer will capture requests for networkaddresses, network management tools, Web sites queries, Web traffic andmore. &apos;You don&apos;t realize how much you&apos;re making public, so I wrote atool that tells you,&apos; said Robert Graham, Errata&apos;s chief executive.Errata has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erratasec.com/ferret.html&quot;&gt;released the source code&lt;/a&gt;to this version 1.0, &apos;feature-poor and buggy&apos; tool on its site. Anyonewith a wireless card will be able to run it, Graham said.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8677</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:14:20 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty: What it Means to You</title>			<link>http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD</link>			<description>&lt;span id=&quot;intelliTXT&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that vein, in August the Senate ratified the Convention onCybercrime, drafted by the Council of Europe with considerable inputfrom the United States. So far, 43 nations have signed on. TheConvention includes many sensible provisions aimed at unifying globalcomputer-crime laws, and closes loopholes that make it possible forcriminals to escape prosecution by locating their activities offshore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But civil libertarians, along with leading telecommunicationscompanies, strongly oppose the treaty. Civil libertarians areespecially concerned about the sweeping authority given toparticipating countries to seize information from private parties asthey investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigatedisn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located. If France isinvestigating a sale of Nazi memorabilia on eBay, the U.S. mustcooperate, even though such transactions are not illegal in the U.S. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require membercountries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies fornetwork traffic, and require any operator of a computer network torespond to requests for information from any participating countrywithout compensation of any kind. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- Vignette V6 Tue Mar 06 11:46:26 2007 --&gt;&lt;!--WEB 6--&gt;&lt;!-- RELATED LINKS --&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are potentially serious problems, especially given that theConvention is open to any country that wants to join. But there aremore practical reasons U.S. businesses should be concerned. Theprovisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of acomputer network, not just telecoms. Worse, Article 12 attachesliability to businesses for &quot;lack of supervision or control&quot; ofemployees who commit criminal offenses covered by the Convention.Businesses must worry about employee activities that may be legal here,but illegal elsewhere, risking administrative, civil, or even criminalpenalties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These investigative and supervision costs will invariably beimposed on businesses without any real controls. Worldwidelaw-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves ofthe opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8674</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:53:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty &amp;#243; Hidden Costs For All.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8673</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99855559/article.pl&quot;&gt;Cybercrime Treaty [~] Hidden Costs For All&lt;/a&gt;. linuxtelephony writes in with an article at CIO Insight about a cybercrime treaty drafted in Europe with help from the US. It has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD&quot;&gt;implications for just about everyone with a network.&lt;/a&gt; From the article: &quot;Civil libertarians are especially concerned about the sweeping authority given to participating countries to seize information from private parties as they investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigated isn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located... Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require member countries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies for network traffic, and require any operator of a computer network to respond to requests for information from any participating country without compensation of any kind... The provisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of a computer network, not just telecoms... Worldwide law-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves of the opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8673</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:48:08 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Bagle Worm Still Swarming over the Net. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8672</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/99803365/article.html&quot;&gt;Bagle Worm Still Swarming over the Net&lt;/a&gt;. Three years after it first appeared, the Bagle is still in business, with many anti-virus engines unable to keep up, a security vendor claims&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E4/99803365&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8672</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:36:02 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Apple Patches QuickTime Holes.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8664</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/03/apple_patches_quicktime_holes.html&quot;&gt;Apple Patches QuickTime Holes&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple&lt;/strong&gt; on Monday issued security patches to plug &lt;a href=&quot;https://webmail.wpni.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798&quot;&gt;multiple security holes&lt;/a&gt; in its &lt;strong&gt;QuickTime&lt;/strong&gt; media player software. The new version of the player -- QuickTime 7.1.5 -- fixes at least eight separate and serious vulnerabilities. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Updates are available for &lt;strong&gt;Mac OS X&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Windows 2000&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Windows XP&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/strong&gt; versions. Mac users can get the latest version either from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/mac.html&quot;&gt;Apple&apos;s site&lt;/a&gt; or via the built-in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/softwareupdates.html&quot;&gt;Software Update&lt;/a&gt; feature.  Windows users with recent versions of QuickTime installed will already have Apple&apos;s Software Update program and should use that to get this latest version.  Alternatively, Windows users can download it by following &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/&quot;&gt;Security Fix&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8664</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:04:12 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/index.rdf">Security Fix</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Month of PHP Bugs Gets Rolling. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8663</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/99645809/article.html&quot;&gt;Month of PHP Bugs Gets Rolling&lt;/a&gt;. Developer launches a Month of PHP Bugs project with 11 bugs in five days. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8663</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:58:44 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline - The NSA at AT&amp;T</title>			<link>http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/</link>			<description>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline is an episode on the NSA having a monitoring station in the AT&amp;amp;T wire room. They have the guy who originally broke the story being interviewed tonight.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/06.html#a8661</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:55:07 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Top Secret: We&apos;re Wiretapping You. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/05.html#a8656</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/99405897/0,72811-0.html&quot;&gt;Top Secret: We&apos;re Wiretapping You&lt;/a&gt;. The feds accidentally give a D.C. attorney a classified document showing that the NSA intercepted his phone calls without a warrant. When they ask for it back, they get a $2 million lawsuit along with it. By Ryan Singel. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/05.html#a8656</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:41:41 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WIRED Blogs: Danger Room - The Pentagon Wants TiVo (to Watch You)</title>			<link>http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/the_pentagon_wa.html</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=inDepthNews&amp;amp;storyID=2007-03-01T213258Z_01_N01472468_RTRUKOC_0_US-ARMS-USA-FUTURE.xml&amp;amp;WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C3-inDepthNews-2&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; yesterday reported on a recently issued study on future technologies written by the Pentagon&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/&quot;&gt;Defense Science Board&lt;/a&gt;.More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillancesystem that would put Big Brother to shame, and they&apos;re looking at thecommercial sector to provide it:</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8651</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:34:51 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>PC World - Microsoft OneCare Last in Antivirus Tests</title>			<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,129521-c,antivirus/article.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&apos;s Windows Live OneCare came in dead last out of a group of17 antivirus programs tested against hundreds of thousands of worms,viruses, Trojan horses and other malware, an Austrian antivirusresearcher reported Wednesday.&lt;/p&gt;		&lt;p&gt;The AV Comparatives Web site,which is maintained by Andreas Cleminti from Innsbruck, Austria, postsquarterly results of tests that pit the top antivirus products againsta dynamic list of nearly half a million individual pieces of malware.&lt;/p&gt;		</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8649</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:27:26 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Microsoft OneCare Last in Antivirus Tests.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8648</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/98967463/article.pl&quot;&gt;Microsoft OneCare Last in Antivirus Tests&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:juha-matti.laurio@netti.fi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juha-Matti Laurio&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;PC World has a story reporting that Microsoft&apos;s Windows Live OneCare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,129521-c,antivirus/article.html&quot;&gt;came in dead last&lt;/a&gt; out of a group of 17 antivirus programs tested against hundreds of thousands of pieces of malware. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_02.php&quot;&gt;report of an Austrian antivirus researcher&lt;/a&gt; was released at the AV Comparatives Web site this week. Several free AV products were included in the test as well.&quot; ---&amp;nbsp;While the top dog was able to find 99.5% of the malicious code, OneCareclocked in at 82.4%. Of course, there&apos;s no metric for the severity ofthe malware in the 17% gap. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8648</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:23:42 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Hacker Defeats Hardware-based Rootkit Detection. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8644</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/99263359/article.pl&quot;&gt;Hacker Defeats Hardware-based Rootkit Detection&lt;/a&gt;. Manequintet writes &quot;Joanna Rutkowska&apos;s latest bit of rootkit-related research shatters the myth that hardware-based (PCI cards or FireWire bus) RAM acquisition is the most reliable and secure way to do forensics. At this year&apos;s Black Hat Federal conference, she &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=109&quot;&gt;demonstrated three different attacks against AMD64 based systems&lt;/a&gt;, showing how the image of volatile memory (RAM) can be made different from the real contents of the physical memory as seen by the CPU. The overall problem, Rutkowska explained, is the design of the system that makes it impossible to reliably read memory from computers. &quot;Maybe we should rethink the design of our computer systems so they they are somehow verifiable,&quot; she said.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/security/2007/03/04.html#a8644</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:52:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>