<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.2.1 on Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:05:36 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Paul Hardwick: Surveillance</title>		<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/</link>		<description>Surveillance technology and usage. Some in places you wouldn&apos;t expect.</description>		<language>en-us</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2007 Paul Hardwick</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:05:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.2.1</generator>		<managingEditor>editor.radio (-at-) MacRonin.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>webmaster.radio(-at-) MacRonin.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>6</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>7</hour>			<hour>1</hour>			</skipHours>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>Big Brother State: surveillance society animation.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8746</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/10/big-brother-state-surveillance-society-animation/&quot;&gt;Big Brother State: surveillance society animation&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Another slick animation outlining the threats of our growing surveillance society: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.bigbrotherstate.com/&quot;&gt;Big Brother State&lt;/a&gt; (YouTube version &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=jJTLL1UjvfU&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[via &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tmttlt.com/archives/2007/03/10/5400/&quot;&gt;Jeremy Hunsinger&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8746</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:08:05 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Big Brother State - An animated short about public surveillance by David Scharf</title>			<link>http://www.bigbrotherstate.com/</link>			<description>please also download using Bit Torrent: &lt;br&gt;(Xvid Version, ca. 50 MB, 768 px x 432 px) ---&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://torrentbox.com/download/94235/bbs_xvid.torrent&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; (Big FLV Version, 55 MB, 768 px x 432 px, use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.download.com/FLV-Player/3000-2139_4-10467081.html&quot;&gt;FLV Player&lt;/a&gt; to view) ---&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torrentbox.com/download/94221/bbs.torrent&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Check the Internet Archive for other resolutions and formats:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ia311541.us.archive.org/0/items/BigBrotherState/&quot;&gt;CLICK HERE&lt;/a&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8745</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:06:35 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF Calls For Aggressive Congressional Hearings on National Security Letter Misuse.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8744</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005153.php&quot;&gt;EFF Calls For Aggressive Congressional Hearings on National Security Letter Misuse&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;EFF is calling for Congress to hold aggressive hearings on the FBI&apos;s domestic intelligence authority after the release of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;Justice Department report&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] showing the Bureau abusing its power to collect telephone, Internet, financial, credit, and other personal records about Americans without judicial approval.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vermont, has said the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings into the report&apos;s findings. But the widespread abuse detailed in the report requires more than just a cursory examination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Bureau&apos;s misuse of its intelligence authority is an ongoing critical problem,&quot; said EFF Staff Attorney Marcia Hofmann. &quot;Congress must use its investigative power to find out what&apos;s really going on at the FBI -- and then rein in the Bureau&apos;s investigative authority to where is was before the USA PATRIOT Act.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the report, the Justice Department&apos;s inspector general identifies four dozen instances in which demands for personal information -- known as National Security Letters -- may have violated laws and agency regulations. The report also found that the Bureau lied to Congress about its use of the letters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI has had limited authority to issue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;National Security Letters&lt;/a&gt; for many years. However, a controversial provision of the PATRIOT Act greatly expanded the Bureau&apos;s ability to use them to gather information about anyone, as long as the agency believes the information could be relevant to a terrorism or espionage investigation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today&apos;s report follows the inspector general&apos;s findings last year that the Bureau had disclosed more than 100 instances of possible intelligence misconduct to the Intelligence Oversight Board in the preceding two years, a number of which were &quot;significant.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2005, EFF argued in a friend of the court brief that the FBI&apos;s &quot;unfettered authority&quot; to issue National Security Letters &quot;is ripe for abuse.&quot; The danger of such abuse has now been documented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is not simply about errors in &apos;oversight,&apos;&quot; said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien. &quot;This is about disregard for the law.  For example, FBI terrorism investigators ignored their own lawyers&apos; advice to stop using so-called &apos;exigent&apos; letters for about two years.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0703b/final.pdf&quot;&gt;read the full report from the Justice Department&lt;/a&gt;, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/patriot/sunset/505.php&quot;&gt;this brief description of  National Security Letters &lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8744</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 03:52:46 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice Department Says F.B.I. Misused Patriot Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8743</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/09/justice-department-says-fbi-misused-patriot-act/&quot;&gt;Justice Department Says F.B.I. Misused Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;In what should not come as that big of a surprise, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070309/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters&quot;&gt;AP reports&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And for three years the FBI underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]The audit by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine found that FBI agents sometimes demanded personal data on individuals without proper authorization. The 126-page audit also found the FBI improperly obtained telephone records in non-emergency circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]Fine[base &apos;]s annual review is required by Congress, over the objections of the Bush administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The audit released Friday found that the number of national security letters issued by the FBI skyrocketed in the years after the Patriot Act became law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2000, for example, the FBI issued an estimated 8,500 letters. By 2003, however, that number jumped to 39,000. It rose again the next year, to about 56,000 letters in 2004, and dropped to approximately 47,000 in 2005.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over the entire three-year period, the FBI reported issuing 143,074 national security letters requesting customer data from businesses, the audit found. But that did not include an additional 8,850 requests that were never recorded in the FBI[base &apos;]s database, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[sigma]The FBI also used so-called [OE][base &apos;]exigent letters,&apos;[base &apos;] signed by officials at FBI headquarters who were not authorized to sign national security letters, to obtain information. In at least 700 cases, these exigent letters were sent to three telephone companies to get toll billing records and subscriber information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[OE][base &apos;]In many cases, there was no pending investigation associated with the request at the time the exigent letters were sent,&apos;[base &apos;] the audit concluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unbelievable. The full 199-page report can be downloaded &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/images/doj_fbiletters_032007.pdf&quot;&gt;here (PDF)&lt;/a&gt;. And more coverage is available at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2007/03/09/doj_fbi_misused_patr.html&quot;&gt;Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/fbi_misuses_und.html&quot;&gt;27B Stroke 6&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org&quot;&gt;michaelzimmer.org&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8743</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 03:49:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/michaelzimmer">michaelzimmer.org</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8741</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000215.html&quot;&gt;Newly Revealed FBI Data Abuses and the Data Retention Red Flag&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings. The release of a new report detailing massive FBI abusesof the PATRIOT Act (particularly in regard to National SecurityLetters), now confirms concerns that I and others have been longexpressing about the potential abuse of retained Internet and otherdata, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000175.html&quot;&gt;Sounding the Alarm on Government-Mandated Data Retention&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/google-privacy-initiative&quot;&gt;An Open Letter to Google:  Concepts for a Google Privacy Initiative&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Broad abuses of retained data are now demonstrated to be real, not theoretical, as described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902353.html&quot;&gt;this Washington Post story&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don&apos;t yet really know the full extent of these violations, butwhat has already been revealed is bad enough as a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that these events will not only trigger considerablesoul-searching by those firms who voluntarily retain user activitydata, but also cause a renewed recognition of how broad mandated dataretention can facilitate, and inevitably will facilitate, such abusesin the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Lauren--&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/&quot;&gt;Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/10.html#a8741</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 03:43:18 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://lauren.vortex.com/index.rdf">Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice: FBI misused Patriot Act powers - Yahoo! News</title>			<link>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE</link>			<description>The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Justice Department audit concluded Friday.&lt;p&gt;And for three years the FBI underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who oversees the FBI, described the problems cited in the report as unacceptable and left open the possibility of criminal charges. He ordered further investigation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&quot;Once we get that information, we&apos;ll be in a better position to assess what kinds of steps should be taken,&quot; Gonzales told reporters following a speech to privacy officials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FBI also used so-called &quot;exigent letters,&quot; signed by officials atFBI headquarters who were not authorized to sign national securityletters, to obtain information. In at least 700 cases, these exigentletters were sent to three telephone companies to get toll billingrecords and subscriber information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;In many cases, there was no pending investigation associatedwith the request at the time the exigent letters were sent,&quot; the auditconcluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a letter to Fine, Gonzales asked the inspector general toissue a follow-up audit in July on whether the FBI had followedrecommendations to fix the problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;To say that I am concerned about what has been revealed inthis report would be an enormous understatement,&quot; Gonzales told theprivacy officials. &quot;Failure to adequately protect information privacysimply is a failure to do our jobs.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senators outraged over the conclusions signaled they would provide tougher oversight of the FBI -- and perhaps limit its power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The report indicates abuse of the authority&quot; Congress gave the FBI, said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Patrick%20Leahy%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=1174vafan/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=592&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11g49da8m/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=592&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Vt. &quot;You cannot have people act as free agents on something where they&apos;re going to be delving into your privacy.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The committee&apos;s top Republican, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Arlen%20Specter%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117p02ae7/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=497&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gg4hb20/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=497&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;),said the FBI appears to have &quot;badly misused national security letters.&quot;The senator said, &quot;This is, regrettably, part of an ongoing processwhere the federal authorities are not really sensitive to privacy andgo far beyond what we have authorized.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Russ Feingold (&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/politics/news/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/*http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?fr=news-storylinks&amp;amp;p=%22Russ%20Feingold%22&amp;amp;c=&amp;amp;n=20&amp;amp;yn=c&amp;amp;c=news&amp;amp;cs=nw&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/bio/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=117l228rs/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=629&quot;&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/capadv/vote/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/national_security_letters/22210451/SIG=11gobi8e5/*http://yahoo.capwiz.com/y/bio/keyvotes/?id=629&quot;&gt;voting record&lt;/a&gt;), D-Wis., another member on the panel that oversees the FBI, said the report &quot;proves that &apos;trust us&apos; doesn&apos;t cut it.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The American Civil Liberties Union said the audit proves Congress must amend the Patriot Act to require judicial approval anytime the FBI wants access to sensitive personal information. &quot;The Attorney General and the FBI are part of the problem and they cannot be trusted to be part of the solution,&quot; said Anthony D. Romero, the ACLU&apos;s executive director.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8738</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:34:53 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8737</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100579673/article.pl&quot;&gt;Audit Finds FBI Abused Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt;. happyslayer writes to mention that according to Yahoo! News a recent audit shows that the FBI has improperly and in some cases &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/national_security_letters;_ylt=A0WTUe.Un_FFy2sBOAms0NUE&quot;&gt;illegally utilized the Patriot Act&lt;/a&gt; to obtain information. &quot;The audit by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine found that FBI agents sometimes demanded personal data on individuals without proper authorization. The 126-page audit also found the FBI improperly obtained telephone records in non-emergency circumstances. The audit blames agent error and shoddy record-keeping for the bulk of the problems and did not find any indication of criminal misconduct. Still, &apos;we believe the improper or illegal uses we found involve serious misuses of national security letter authorities,&apos; the audit concludes.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8737</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:27:43 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Local - Olofsson claims Sweden has tapped phones &apos;for decades&apos;</title>			<link>http://www.thelocal.se/6645/20070309/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Deputy prime minister &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/search.php?keywordSearch=Maud_Olofsson&quot; class=&quot;nodec&quot;&gt;Maud Olofsson&lt;/a&gt;has added a new twist to Sweden&apos;s divisive surveillance debate. TheCentre Party leader claims that defence minister Mikael Odenberg&apos;sproposed legislation would merely codify practices that have alreadybeen in operation for decades. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Previously, at a time when all telecommunications were state-operated, Sweden&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/search.php?keywordSearch=National_Defence_Radio_Establishment&quot; class=&quot;nodec&quot;&gt;National Defence Radio Establishment&lt;/a&gt; (F&amp;Atilde;&amp;#182;rsvarets Radioanstalt - FRA) regularly tapped telephone lines in and out of the country, says Olofsson. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8736</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:23:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Local - &apos;Big brother&apos; surveillance makes waves in Sweden</title>			<link>http://www.thelocal.se/6619/20070307/</link>			<description>A far-reaching wiretapping programme proposed by Sweden&apos;s government todefend against foreign threats, including monitoring emails andtelephone calls, has stirred up a fiery debate in the past few weeks,with critics decrying the creation of a &quot;big brother&quot; state.&lt;br&gt;     &lt;br&gt;The new legislation, to be presented to parliament on Thursday, wouldenable the National Defence Radio Establishment (FRA) to tap allInternet and telephone communication in and out of Sweden.&lt;br&gt;   </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8735</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:21:39 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Sweden Admits Tapping Citizens&apos; Phones for Decades. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8734</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100567859/article.pl&quot;&gt;Sweden Admits Tapping Citizens&apos; Phones for Decades&lt;/a&gt;. 			paulraps writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Sweden is close to implementing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/6619/20070307/&quot;&gt;new surveillance legislation&lt;/a&gt;that will include the monitoring of emails, telephone calls and keywordsearches using advanced pattern analysis. The objective is to detect&apos;threats such as terrorism, IT attacks or the spread of weapons of massdestruction&apos; but the proposals have divided the country. In a misguidedattempt to put people at ease, the government admitted that Sweden hasbeen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelocal.se/6645/20070309/&quot;&gt;tapping its citizens&apos; phones&lt;/a&gt; for decades anyway.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8734</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:18:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Blotter(ABC NEWS) - Exclusive: Report Says FBI Violated Patriot Act Guidelines</title>			<link>http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/03/exclusive_repor.html</link>			<description>The FBI repeatedly failed to follow the strict guidelines of thePatriot Act when its agents took advantage of a new provision allowingthe FBI to obtain phone and financial records without a court order,according to a report to be made public Friday by the JusticeDepartment&apos;s Inspector General.&lt;p&gt;The report, in classified and unclassified versions, remains closelyheld, but Washington officials who have seen it tell ABC News itdocuments &quot;numerous lapses&quot; and describe it as &quot;scathing&quot; and &quot;not apretty picture for the FBI.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FBI Director Robert Mueller is scheduled to brief Congress on the report at noon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The officials say the inspector general found the FBI underreportedby at least 20 percent the use of the controversial provision, known asNational Security Letters, NSLs, in required disclosures to Congress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Patriot Act gave FBI agents the ability to demand telephone,bank, credit card and library records by issuing an administrativeletter, bypassing the need to seek a warrant from a federal judge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8731</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:02:02 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Pine Bluff - Scaled-back version of drug database passes Senate</title>			<link>http://www.pbcommercial.com/articles/2007/03/09/ap-state-ar/d8noh5o82.txt</link>			<description>LITTLEROCK - Scaling back the scope of a statewide database to monitor someprescription drug purchases gained Senate approval of the measureThursday. The bill&apos;s sponsor said the amendments were intended toaddress concerns about patient privacy.          &lt;table align=&quot;right&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;4&quot; width=&quot;&quot;&gt;            &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;              &lt;td&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;            &lt;/tr&gt;            &lt;tr&gt;              &lt;td class=&quot;cutline&quot; width=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;            &lt;/tr&gt;          &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;          &lt;p class=&quot;text12&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;[...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By a 20-7 vote, the Senate approveda bill by Sen. Denny Altes, R-Fort Smith, that would allow the stateBoard of Pharmacy to establish standards for setting up the database ondrug purchases. The database would track schedule II and schedule IIInarcotics, such as morphine or OxyContin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I think we&apos;ve amendedthis about six times now,&quot; Altes said before the vote. &quot;I think thesechanges should address all the concerns that were raised.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Altesoriginally called for a database to track virtually all prescriptiondrug purchases in the state. The measure passed by the Senate allowsthe Board of Pharmacy to set the criteria for the information to betracked by the database.&lt;/p&gt;          &lt;!-- AdSys ad not found for ap-state-ar:middle --&gt;          Sen.Jim Argue, D-Little Rock, said he still believed the database could besubject to abuse and could harm the privacy of some patients.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Thereis no evidence that a database like this works, but there is evidencethat databases like this could be violated,&quot; Argue said.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8730</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:33:58 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security Tests Snoop Computer System. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8727</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100464513/article.pl&quot;&gt;Homeland Security Tests Snoop Computer System&lt;/a&gt;. Parallax Blue writes &quot;The Washington Times reports that Homeland Security has developed and is testing a new computer system called &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070308-124323-4382r.htm&quot;&gt;ADVISE (Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement)&lt;/a&gt; that collects and analyzes personal information on US citizens. Relevant data &apos;can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information.&apos; The program apparently uses the same process as the Pentagon&apos;s Total Information Awareness project, which was aborted in 2003 due to privacy concerns.&quot;&lt;p&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8727</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:23:56 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Policy Makers call for University Internet Filters.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8726</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/%7Er/publicknowledge-main/%7E3/100352631/858&quot;&gt;Policy Makers call for University Internet Filters&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;At today[base &apos;]s House Judiciary &lt;a href=&quot;http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=280&quot;&gt;Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property hearing&lt;/a&gt;, titled [base &quot;]An Update - Piracy on University Networks,[per thou] we heard from legislators that they[base &apos;]re very concerned about [base &quot;]piracy[per thou] on campus networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://boss.streamos.com/real/judiciary/courts/courts030807.smi&quot;&gt;You should be able to watch the video of the hearing here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;The common theme of the solutions was not only educating students (which all of the witnesses said that they were working on collaboratively), but for campuses to employ technology to filter the packets flowing over the network.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/858&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/%7Er/publicknowledge-main/%7E4/100352631&quot;&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org&quot;&gt;Public Knowledge - Blogging, Events, and Action Alerts&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8726</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:16:28 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/publicknowledge-main">Public Knowledge - Blogging, Events, and Action Alerts</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Sweden: Monitor Communications.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8721</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SWEDEN_E_MAIL_SPYING?SITE=WIRE&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&quot;&gt;Sweden: Monitor Communications&lt;/a&gt;. A Swedish government security plan would allow a defense intelligence agency to monitor -- without a court order -- e-mail traffic and phone calls crossing the nation&apos;s borders. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/09.html#a8721</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:35:34 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>NHL Union Denies E-mail Spying.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8718</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/H/HKN_NHLPA_SASKIN?SITE=WIRE&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;amp;CTIME=2007-03-08-18-45-41&quot;&gt;NHL Union Denies E-mail Spying&lt;/a&gt;. The union&apos;s chief Ted Saskin denies monitoring player&apos;s e-mails, pointing fingers at his predecessor Bob Goodenow, who also denied the spying allegations.  By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8718</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:55:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Image Gallery: Seven ways to keep your search history private. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8715</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9012082&amp;amp;source=rss_topic84&quot;&gt;Image Gallery: Seven ways to keep your search history private&lt;/a&gt;. Worried that Google and other search sites know too much about you -- and that the federal government can subpoena that data? Fear not -- we&apos;ve got seven steps you can follow to keep your search history to yourself. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8715</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:22:29 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security revives supersnoop - The Washington Times</title>			<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070308-124323-4382r.htm</link>			<description>Homeland Security officials are testing a supersnoop computer system that sifts through personal information on U.S. citizens to detect possible terrorist attacks, prompting concerns from lawmakers who have called for investigations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The system uses the same data-mining process that was developed by the Pentagon&apos;s Total Information Awareness (TIA) project that was banned by Congress in 2003 because of vast privacy violations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of the project called ADVISE -- Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement -- was requested by Rep. David R. Obey, Wisconsin Democrat and chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The investigation focuses on whether the program violates privacy laws, and the findings will be released after completion of the Iraq war supplemental spending bill, possibly as early as this week, a panel aide said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ADVISE and TIA data-mining projects rely on personal data to track individual behavior and consumer transactions to develop computer algorithms that create a pattern that some behavioral scientists say can predict terrorist behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Privacy concerns prompted lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to introduce legislation in January to require that government agencies disclose data-mining practices in regular reports to Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;A serious discussion on the implications of data-mining programs is long overdue,&quot; Sen. Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat and a sponsor of the bill, said yesterday. Sen. John E. Sununu, New Hampshire Republican, is also a bill sponsor.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8711</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:21:29 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Gates calls for new privacy law | InfoWorld | By Grant Gross</title>			<link>http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/03/08/HNgatesprivacylaw_1.html?source=NLC-TB&amp;cgd=2007-03-08</link>			<description>&lt;p page=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot;&gt;Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates asked the U.S. Congress to pass a comprehensive privacy law this year, allowing consumers to                     control how their personal information is used.                  &lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;div class=&quot;embedContainer&quot;&gt;                     			                                             				&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; language=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;getLHCRelSpArt(&apos;/article/07/03/08/HNgatesprivacylaw_1.html&apos;,&apos;leftColumn&apos;);&lt;/script&gt;                  &lt;/div&gt;                  &lt;!--end div embedContainer--&gt;                  &lt;p page=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot;&gt;Gatesrepeated past Microsoft calls for a wide-ranging privacy law during aspeech at advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology&apos;s(CDT) annual gala dinner Wednesday. A comprehensive privacy bill shouldallow consumers to control their personal data, should providetransparency about what their data is used for, and should notify themwhen their data has been compromised, Gates said. &lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;p page=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot;&gt;Gates said he believes the U.S. can achieve a balance between privacy and protecting the country against terrorists and other                     criminals. But the balance will not be an easy one to create, Gates said.                  &lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;p page=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot;&gt;Whilemany U.S. residents would say they want as much privacy &quot;as possible,&quot;law enforcement needs to be able to track criminals, Gates said. &quot;Theseprivacy issues are not as easy as you might think,&quot; he told the crowd. &lt;/p&gt;                  </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8709</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:09:19 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>heise Security - All Microsoft updates phone home</title>			<link>http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86429</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Possibly as a reaction to heise Security&apos;s report that Windows Genuine Advantage Notification sends back data to Redmond even when users choose to terminate its installation, a Microsoft developer using the pseudonym alexkoc has now posted an entry in the WGA blog. There he reveals that every update that flows through Windows Update at the very least informs Microsoft about whether the installation was successful or not. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://update.microsoft.com/windowsupdate/v6/privacy.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Privacy Statement&lt;/a&gt; of Windows Update Microsoft grants itself fairly far-reaching rights. Thus the information collected by the Redmond-based behemoth includes the computer make and model, version information for the operating system, browser, and any other Microsoft software for which updates might be available, Plug&amp;amp;Play ID numbers of hardware devices, region and language setting, Globally Unique Identifier (GUID), Product ID and Product Key, BIOS name, revision number, and revision date. By way of justifying Microsoft&apos;s approach, alexkoc writes that the EULA, likewise presented by the WGA installer, also covered the relaying of such information. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With some updates such as the WGA Notification, the installer transmits data that Microsoft says it merely requires for quality control purposes and to improve the installer itself. The WGA package thus, among other things, sends back an event code. To calm the fears of users, alexkoc presents a graphic explaining the various fields of such a data packet. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When the product IDs and product keys found belong to legal software, Microsoft will delete the data right away; only in cases of suspected software piracy will it store the data, the company has said. In the blog, the company once again explicitly states that it does not use the information gathered to identify or contact users. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8706</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:54:34 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>All Microsoft Updates Phone Home.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8705</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/100320461/article.pl&quot;&gt;All Microsoft Updates Phone Home&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:ju@heisec.de&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;juct&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;In the wake of heise Security&apos;s report on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86294&quot;&gt;garrulous WGA Notification&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft has now supplied additional details on the data sent. They have revealed to developers that apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86429&quot;&gt;all updates relay information&lt;/a&gt; to the company in Redmond.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/08.html#a8705</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:49:17 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WGA Reports Back To MS Even If You Choose Not To Install - Aviran&apos;s Place</title>			<link>http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;Heise online &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2F85884&amp;amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;on a very interesting action Microsoft is taking during the installation of WGA. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt;to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel theinstallation, the setup program will send your info and the fact thatyou choose not to install WGA back to their servers.&lt;/p&gt;In addition to that it seems that the setup program send someinformation stored in your registry to &lt;a href=&quot;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;http://genuine.microsoft.com/&lt;/a&gt;.While it does not specifically identify the user, it looks like it doessend some identification of your computer and Windows version (seepicture) to Microsoft servers.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8693</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:06:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8692</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/100015015/article.pl&quot;&gt;Microsoft WGA Phones Home Even When Told No&lt;/a&gt;. Aviran writes &quot;When you start WGA setup and get to the license agreement page but decided NOT to install the highly controversial WGA component and cancel the installation, the setup program &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aviransplace.com/2007/03/07/wga-reports-back-to-ms-even-if-you-choose-not-to-install/&quot;&gt;will send information stored in your registry&lt;/a&gt; and the fact that you choose not to install WGA back to Microsoft&apos;s servers.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8692</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Nightline NSA Spy Exclusive: Dud. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8687</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/abc_news_klein_.html&quot;&gt;Nightline NSA Spy Exclusive: Dud&lt;/a&gt;. AT&amp;amp;T whistleblower Mark Klein breaks silence to tell ABC News&apos; Nightline about the NSA eavesdropping on the internet, but reveals little new information. In 27B Stroke 6. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8687</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:07:37 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Wal-Mart fires technician who recorded phone calls</title>			<link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012319</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;March 05, 2007 &amp;nbsp;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(Reuters)&lt;/a&gt;-- CHICAGO - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said today it fired a systemstechnician for intercepting text messages of people who were notWal-Mart employees and for recording telephone conversations with a &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; reporter without authorization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart, the world&apos;s largest retailer, said an internalinvestigation found the technician had monitored and recorded phonecalls between Wal-Mart public relations employees and a New York TimesCo. reporter between September and January.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Bentonville, Ark.-based retailer also said the technician, whoworked in its information systems division, intercepted and stored textmessages that contained certain key words, including those sent bypeople in the Bentonville area who were not Wal-Mart employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart spokeswoman Mona Williams said on a call with reporters that the technician &quot;did this on his own.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While interviews with the technician gave the retailer an idea as towhy he recorded the calls, Williams said she could not disclose thereasons because the case has been turned over to federal investigators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8684</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:52:20 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?  </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8683</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99782770/article.do&quot;&gt;Spying at Wal*Mart: Human nature run amuck?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Does the Wal-Mart eavesdropping debacle have the potential to be this year&apos;s HP scandal? A former IT security staffer for the retailer evaluates what might have happened. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/07.html#a8683</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:46:37 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Your Wi-Fi can tell people a lot about you | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;ARLINGTON, Va.--Simply booting up a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop can tellpeople sniffing wireless network traffic a lot about your computer--andabout you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Soon after a computer powers up, it starts looking for wirelessnetworks and network services. Even if the wireless hardware is thenshut-off, a snoop may already have caught interesting data. Much moreinformation can be &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Insecure+networks+could+lead+to+lawsuits/2009-1033_3-940460.html&quot; title=&quot;Insecure networks could lead to lawsuits -- Monday, Jul 1, 2002&quot;&gt;plucked out of the air&lt;/a&gt; if the computer is connected to an access point, in particular an access point without security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &quot;You&apos;re leaking all kinds of information that an attacker can use,&quot;David Maynor, chief technology officer at Errata Security, saidThursday in a presentation at the Black Hat DC event here. &quot;If thegovernment was taking this information from you, people would be up inarms. Yet you&apos;re leaking this voluntarily using your laptop at theairport.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; There are many tools that let anyone &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Wi-Fi+group+backs+brawnier+security+standard/2100-7351_3-5342824.html&quot; title=&quot;Wi-Fi group backs brawnier security standard -- Wednesday, Sep 1, 2004&quot;&gt;listen in on wireless network traffic&lt;/a&gt;.These tools can capture information such as usernames and passwords fore-mail accounts and instant message tools as well as data entered intounsecured Web sites. At the annual Defcon hacker gathering, a &quot;wall ofsheep&quot; always &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2300-1029_3-6102806-1.html&quot; title=&quot;Photos: Hacking at Defcon -- Monday, Aug 7, 2006&quot;&gt;lists captured log-in credentials&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Errata has developed another network sniffer that looks fortraffic using 25 protocols, including those for the popular instantmessage clients as well as DHCP, SNMP, DNS and HTTP. This means thesniffer will capture requests for network addresses, network managementtools, Web sites queries, Web traffic and more. &lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8678</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:20:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>A Network Sniffer On Steroids.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8677</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99790580/article.pl&quot;&gt;A Network Sniffer On Steroids&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QuantumCrypto&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;Errata has developed &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Your+Wi-Fi+can+tell+people+a+lot+about+you/2100-7355_3-6163666.html&quot;&gt;a new network sniffer&lt;/a&gt;,dubbed &apos;Ferret,&apos; that looks for traffic using 25 protocols, includingthose for the popular instant message clients as well as DHCP, SNMP,DNS and HTTP. This means the sniffer will capture requests for networkaddresses, network management tools, Web sites queries, Web traffic andmore. &apos;You don&apos;t realize how much you&apos;re making public, so I wrote atool that tells you,&apos; said Robert Graham, Errata&apos;s chief executive.Errata has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erratasec.com/ferret.html&quot;&gt;released the source code&lt;/a&gt;to this version 1.0, &apos;feature-poor and buggy&apos; tool on its site. Anyonewith a wireless card will be able to run it, Graham said.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8677</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:14:20 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty: What it Means to You</title>			<link>http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD</link>			<description>&lt;span id=&quot;intelliTXT&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that vein, in August the Senate ratified the Convention onCybercrime, drafted by the Council of Europe with considerable inputfrom the United States. So far, 43 nations have signed on. TheConvention includes many sensible provisions aimed at unifying globalcomputer-crime laws, and closes loopholes that make it possible forcriminals to escape prosecution by locating their activities offshore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But civil libertarians, along with leading telecommunicationscompanies, strongly oppose the treaty. Civil libertarians areespecially concerned about the sweeping authority given toparticipating countries to seize information from private parties asthey investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigatedisn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located. If France isinvestigating a sale of Nazi memorabilia on eBay, the U.S. mustcooperate, even though such transactions are not illegal in the U.S. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require membercountries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies fornetwork traffic, and require any operator of a computer network torespond to requests for information from any participating countrywithout compensation of any kind. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- Vignette V6 Tue Mar 06 11:46:26 2007 --&gt;&lt;!--WEB 6--&gt;&lt;!-- RELATED LINKS --&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are potentially serious problems, especially given that theConvention is open to any country that wants to join. But there aremore practical reasons U.S. businesses should be concerned. Theprovisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of acomputer network, not just telecoms. Worse, Article 12 attachesliability to businesses for &quot;lack of supervision or control&quot; ofemployees who commit criminal offenses covered by the Convention.Businesses must worry about employee activities that may be legal here,but illegal elsewhere, risking administrative, civil, or even criminalpenalties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These investigative and supervision costs will invariably beimposed on businesses without any real controls. Worldwidelaw-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves ofthe opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8674</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:53:57 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cybercrime Treaty &amp;#243; Hidden Costs For All.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8673</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99855559/article.pl&quot;&gt;Cybercrime Treaty [~] Hidden Costs For All&lt;/a&gt;. linuxtelephony writes in with an article at CIO Insight about a cybercrime treaty drafted in Europe with help from the US. It has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2100916,00.asp?kc=COQFTEMNL030607EOAD&quot;&gt;implications for just about everyone with a network.&lt;/a&gt; From the article: &quot;Civil libertarians are especially concerned about the sweeping authority given to participating countries to seize information from private parties as they investigate cybercrimes, even when the activity being investigated isn&apos;t a crime in the country where the data is located... Telecommunications companies object to provisions that require member countries to establish and enforce potent data-retention policies for network traffic, and require any operator of a computer network to respond to requests for information from any participating country without compensation of any kind... The provisions for data retention and production apply to any operator of a computer network, not just telecoms... Worldwide law-enforcement agencies, in other words, may now avail themselves of the opportunity to outsource their most expensive problems to you.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8673</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:48:08 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Action Alert: Repeal the REAL ID Act!</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8671</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005145.php&quot;&gt;Action Alert: Repeal the REAL ID Act!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;p&gt;The federal government has taken another step towards forcing you to carry a national ID in order to get on airplanes, open a bank account, enter federal buildings, and much more. But with state legislatures and Congressional representatives increasingly turning against the REAL ID Act, you can help stop this costly, privacy-invasive mandate -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=275&quot;&gt;voice your opposition now.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On March 1, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nprm_realid.pdf&quot;&gt;draft regulations&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] for implementing REAL ID, which makes states standardize drivers licenses and create a vast national database linking all of the ID records together. Once in place, uses of the IDs and database will inevitably expand to facilitate a wide range of tracking and surveillance activities. Remember, the Social Security number started innocuously enough, but it has become a prerequisite for a host of government services and been co-opted by private companies to create massive databases of personal information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;REAL ID won&apos;t just cost you your privacy. The states and individual taxpayers bear the estimated 23 billion dollar burden of implementing the law, and that figure is probably low given that the necessary verification systems don&apos;t exist yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what will you get in return? Not improved national security, because IDs do little to stop those who haven&apos;t already been identified as threats, and wrongdoers will still be able to create fake documents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;REAL ID is fundamentally flawed, and DHS&apos; proposed regulations do nothing to change that. Thankfully, the tide is turning against REAL ID in a big way -- state legislatures around the country are passing or considering legislation rejecting its implementation, and Congress is considering repealing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The DHS regulations mean that states must have an implementation plan ready by October 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=275&quot;&gt;Make sure your Congressional representatives support the repeal of REAL ID before it&apos;s too late.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information, check out San Jose Mercury News&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/16843010.htm&quot;&gt;recent editorial opposing REAL ID&lt;/a&gt; as well as the ACLU&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realnightmare.org&quot;&gt;Realnightmare.org&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8671</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:24:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WH Privacy Board OKs Eavesdropping.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8670</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TERROR_PRIVACY?SITE=WIRE&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&quot;&gt;Privacy Board OKs Eavesdropping&lt;/a&gt;. A secretive White House privacy board says two Bush surveillance programs -- electronic eavesdropping and financial tracking -- do not violate citizens&apos; civil liberties. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8670</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:44:09 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Blue Box #52: Skype spyware? Cisco SIP issue again, secure call recording, Phil Zimmermann on VON Magazine, US Congress and Caller ID, ringjacking, Skype security, VoIP security, listener comments and more.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8669</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/BlueBox/%7E3/99544727/blue_box_52_sky.html&quot;&gt;Blue Box #52: Skype spyware? Cisco SIP issue again, secure call recording, Phil Zimmermann on VON Magazine, US Congress and Caller ID, ringjacking, Skype security, VoIP security, listener comments and more&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Synopsis:&lt;/strong&gt; Skype spyware? Cisco SIP issue again, secure call recording, Phil Zimmermann on VON Magazine, US Congress and Caller ID, ringjacking, Skype security, VoIP security, listener comments and more&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueboxpodcast.com/&quot;&gt;Blue Box: The VoIP Security Podcast&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8669</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:25:11 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BlueBox">Blue Box: The VoIP Security Podcast</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Wal-Mart fires technician who recorded phone calls.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8667</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.computerworld.com/%7Er/Computerworld/Privacy/News/%7E3/99574057/article.do&quot;&gt;Wal-Mart fires technician who recorded phone calls&lt;/a&gt;. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said it fired a systems technician for intercepting text messages of people who were not Wal-Mart employees and for recording telephone conversations with a New York Times reporter without authorization. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com&quot;&gt;Computerworld Privacy News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8667</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:18:41 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Privacy/News">Computerworld Privacy News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Anti-terror tests broke law, says watchdog - 03/01/07 - Tennessean.com</title>			<link>http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070301/NEWS08/703010393/1025/NEWS06</link>			<description>The Department of Homeland Security is testing a data-mining program that would attempt to spot terrorists by combing vast amounts of information about average Americans, such as flight and hotel reservations.&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The new program, similar to a Pentagon program that Congress killed in 2003 over concerns about civil liberties, could take effect as soon as next year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;But system testers probably already have violated privacy laws by reviewing real information, instead of fake data, a source familiar with a congressional investigation into the $42.5 million program told &lt;i&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The program, called Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE), is on the cutting edge of analytical technology that applies mathematical algorithms to uncover hidden relationships in data. The idea is to troll a vast sea of information and extract suspicious people, places and other elements based on their links and behavioral patterns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;bodytext&quot;&gt;The privacy violation is described in a Government Accountability Office report due out soon. &quot;Undoubtedly there are likely to be more,&quot; GAO Comptroller David Walker said recently.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8665</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:13:09 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline - The NSA at AT&amp;T</title>			<link>http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/</link>			<description>Tonight(Tuesday) on Nightline is an episode on the NSA having a monitoring station in the AT&amp;amp;T wire room. They have the guy who originally broke the story being interviewed tonight.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/06.html#a8661</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:55:07 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Real Life &amp;quot;Candid Camera&amp;quot; in Advertising Billboards</title>			<link>http://www.nowpublic.com/real_life_candid_camera_in_advertising_billboards</link>			<description> No, no, no, the government isn&apos;t spying on us again this time around. Advertisers are actually putting hidden cameras in their billboards to see how customers react to their slogans, products, and pictures. It&apos;s all apart of a grocery store experiment/product that senses when people come to an item, and zooms into their faces to find how out what their expression is. </description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/05.html#a8660</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:00:18 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>What Are You? A Mind Reader? </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/05.html#a8659</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/R/READING_MINDS?SITE=WIRE&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&quot;&gt;What Are You? A Mind Reader?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Well, in a manner of speaking, yes. Researchers use a brain scan that lets them identify your intentions before you actually do anything. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Top Stories&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/05.html#a8659</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:50:34 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News: Top Stories</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Top Secret: We&apos;re Wiretapping You. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/05.html#a8656</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/99405897/0,72811-0.html&quot;&gt;Top Secret: We&apos;re Wiretapping You&lt;/a&gt;. The feds accidentally give a D.C. attorney a classified document showing that the NSA intercepted his phone calls without a warrant. When they ask for it back, they get a $2 million lawsuit along with it. By Ryan Singel. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/05.html#a8656</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:41:41 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>WIRED Blogs: Danger Room - The Pentagon Wants TiVo (to Watch You)</title>			<link>http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/the_pentagon_wa.html</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=inDepthNews&amp;amp;storyID=2007-03-01T213258Z_01_N01472468_RTRUKOC_0_US-ARMS-USA-FUTURE.xml&amp;amp;WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C3-inDepthNews-2&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; yesterday reported on a recently issued study on future technologies written by the Pentagon&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/&quot;&gt;Defense Science Board&lt;/a&gt;.More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillancesystem that would put Big Brother to shame, and they&apos;re looking at thecommercial sector to provide it:</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/04.html#a8651</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:34:51 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>The Pentagon Wants a &apos;TiVo&apos; to Watch You.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/04.html#a8650</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/99351007/article.pl&quot;&gt;The Pentagon Wants a &apos;TiVo&apos; to Watch You&lt;/a&gt;. An anonymous reader writes &quot;Danger Room, a Wired blog, today cites &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/03/the_pentagon_wa.html&quot;&gt;a study of future electronic snooping technologies &lt;/a&gt;from Reuters, written by the Pentagon&apos;s Defense Science Board. More than anything, it seems these outside advisers want a surveillance system that would put Big Brother to shame, and they&apos;re looking at the commercial sector to provide it. &apos;The ability to record terabyte and larger databases will provide an omnipresent knowledge of the present and the past that can be used to rewind battle space observations in TiVo-like fashion and to run recorded time backwards to help identify and locate even low-level enemy forces. For example, after a car bomb detonates, one would have the ability to play high-resolution data backward in time to follows the vehicle back to the source, and then use that knowledge to focus collection and gain additional information by organizing and searching through archived data.&apos;&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/04.html#a8650</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:31:33 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Justice Department takes aim at image-sharing sites | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6163679.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; The Bush administration has accelerated its Internet surveillancepush by proposing that Web sites must keep records of who uploadsphotographs or videos in case police determine the content is illegaland choose to investigate, CNET News.com has learned.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That proposal surfaced Wednesday in a private meeting during which U.S.Department of Justice officials, including Assistant Attorney GeneralRachel Brand, tried to convince industry representatives such as AOLand Comcast that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales pressures ISPs on data retention -- Friday, May 26, 2006&quot;&gt;data retention&lt;/a&gt;would be valuable in investigating terrorism, child pornography andother crimes. The discussions were described to News.com by severalpeople who attended the meeting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A second purpose of the meeting in Washington, D.C., according to thesources, was to ask Internet service providers how much it would costto record details on their subscribers for two years. At the veryleast, the companies would be required to keep logs for police of whichcustomer is assigned a specific Internet address.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only universities and libraries would be excluded, one participantsaid. &quot;There&apos;s a PR concern with including the libraries, so we&apos;re notgoing to include them,&quot; the participant quoted the Justice Departmentas saying. &quot;We know we&apos;re going to get a pushback, so we&apos;re not goingto do that.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+ISPs+must+keep+records+on+users/2100-1028_3-6117455.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales: ISPs must keep records on users -- Tuesday, Sep 19, 2006&quot;&gt;lobbying Congress&lt;/a&gt; for mandatory data retention, calling it a &quot;national problem that requires federal legislation.&quot; Gonzales has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html&quot; title=&quot;Gonzales pressures ISPs on data retention -- Friday, May 26, 2006&quot;&gt;convened earlier private meetings&lt;/a&gt; to pressure industry representatives. And last month, Republicans introduced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/GOP+revives+ISP-tracking+legislation/2100-1028_3-6156948.html&quot; title=&quot;GOP revives ISP-tracking legislation -- Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007&quot;&gt;mandatory data retention bill&lt;/a&gt; in the U.S. House of Representatives that would &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00837:&quot;&gt;let the attorney general&lt;/a&gt; dictate what must be stored and for how long.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8630</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:12:46 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>DoJ Mulls Tracking Picture Uploads. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8629</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/98887304/article.pl&quot;&gt;DoJ Mulls Tracking Picture Uploads&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:hislordship@canada.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dominus Suus&lt;/a&gt;passed us a link to a C|Net article about a disturbing threat toprivacy from the Justice Department. According to the article, aprivate meeting was held Wednesday between Justice officials andtelecom industry representatives. With individuals from companies suchas AOL and Comcast looking on, the officials continued overtures toincrease data retention by ISPs on American citizens. This week, theywere specifically looking to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6163679.html&quot;&gt;records kept of photo uploads&lt;/a&gt;.In this way, and &apos;in case police determine the content is illegal andchoose to investigate,&apos; an easy trail from A to Z will be available.The article provides a good deal of background on the BushAdministration&apos;s history with data retention, with ties to events evenolder than the Bush presidency.&amp;nbsp; --- &quot;The Justice Department&apos;s requestfor information about compliance costs echoes a decade-ago debate overwiretapping digital telephones, which led to the 1994 CommunicationsAssistance for Law Enforcement Act. To reduce opposition by telephonecompanies, Congress set aside $500 million for reimbursement and thelegislation easily cleared both chambers by voice votes. Once Internetproviders come up with specific figures, privacy advocates worry,Congress will offer to write a generous check to cover all compliancecosts and the process will repeat itself.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8629</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:57:23 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security offers details on Real ID | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+offers+details+on+Real+ID/2100-1028_3-6163509.html</link>			<description>Hundreds of millions of Americans will have until 2013 to beoutfitted with new digital ID cards, the Bush administration said onThursday in a long-awaited announcement that reveals details of how thenew identification plan will work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;p&gt;The announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security offers afive-year extension to the deadline for states to issue the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+chief+defends+Real+ID+plan/2100-1028_3-6143862.html&quot; title=&quot;Homeland Security chief defends Real ID plan -- Thursday, Dec 14, 2006&quot;&gt;ID cards&lt;/a&gt;, and proposes creating the equivalent of a national database that would include details on all 240 million licensed drivers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nprm_realid.pdf&quot;&gt;draft regulations&lt;/a&gt;  (PDF), which were required by Congress in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/FAQ+How+Real+ID+will+affect+you/2100-1028_3-5697111.html&quot; title=&quot;FAQ: How Real ID will affect you -- Friday, May 6, 2005&quot;&gt;2005 Real ID Act&lt;/a&gt; and are unlikely to assuage &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Maine+rejects+Real+ID+Act/2100-7348_3-6153532.html&quot; title=&quot;Maine rejects Real ID Act -- Thursday, Jan 25, 2007&quot;&gt;privacy and cost concerns&lt;/a&gt; raised by state legislatures:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;acirc;o&amp;#162; The Real ID cards must include all drivers&apos; home addresses and otherpersonal information printed on the front and in a two-dimensionalbarcode on the back. The barcode will not be encrypted because of&quot;operational complexity,&quot; which means that businesses like bars andbanks that require ID would be capable of scanning and recordingcustomers&apos; home addresses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;acirc;o&amp;#162; A radio frequency identification (RFID) tag is underconsideration. Homeland Security is asking for input on how thelicenses could incorporate &quot;RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology, inaddition to&quot; the two-dimensional barcode requirement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8628</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:52:36 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Homeland Security Offers Details on Real ID.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8627</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/99047876/article.pl&quot;&gt;Homeland Security Offers Details on Real ID&lt;/a&gt;. 			pr0nqu33n writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;C|Net is running an article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Homeland+Security+offers+details+on+Real+ID/2100-1028_3-6163509.html&quot;&gt;the DHS&apos;s requirements for the Real ID system&lt;/a&gt;.Thursday members of the Bush administration finally unveiled details ofthe anticipated national identification program. Millions of Americanswill have until 2013 to register for the system, which will (some wouldargue) constitute a national ID. RFID trackers for the cards are underconsideration, as is a cohesive nation-wide design for the card. Statesmust submit a proposal for how they&apos;ll adopt the system by earlyOctober of this year. If they don&apos;t, come May of next year theirresidents will see their licenses unable to gain them access to federalbuildings and airplanes. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nprm_realid.pdf&quot;&gt;full regulations for the system&lt;/a&gt; are available online in PDF format. Likewise, the DHS has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/laws/gc_1172767635686.shtm&quot;&gt;Questions and Answers style FAQ&lt;/a&gt; available to explain the program to the curious.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/03.html#a8627</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:48:45 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Audio Watermark Web Spider Starts Crawling.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8617</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/97525077/article.pl&quot;&gt;Audio Watermark Web Spider Starts Crawling&lt;/a&gt;. DippityDo writes &quot;A new web tool is &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070227-8937.html&quot;&gt;scanning the net for signs of copyright infringement.&lt;/a&gt; Digimarc&apos;s patented system searches video and audio files for special watermarks that would indicate they are not to be shared, then reports back to HQ with the results. It sounds kind of creepy, but has a long way to go before it makes a practical difference. &apos;For the system to work, players at multiple levels would need to get involved. Broadcasters would need to add identifying watermarks to their broadcast, in cooperation with copyright holders, and both parties would need to register their watermarks with the system. Then, in the event that a user capped a broadcast and uploaded it online, the scanner system would eventually find it and report its location online. Yet the system is not designed to hop on P2P networks or private file sharing hubs, but instead crawls public web sites in search of watermarked material.&apos;&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8617</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:43:48 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot">Slashdot</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>TIA becomes ADVISE | Free Government Information (FGI)</title>			<link>http://freegovinfo.info/node/973</link>			<description>Congress killed the Total Information Awareness (TIA) program in 2003and several new programs have been reported to take its place. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://freegovinfo.info/node/419&quot;&gt;Total Information Awareness just changed its name&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;FGI&lt;/i&gt;,2006-02-26.) A forthcoming GAO report looks at the use of the Analysis,Dissemination, Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE)system.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8613</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:13:23 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Legislation eyes nightclubs - Greenwich Time</title>			<link>http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/local/newyork/ny-nyclub015113247mar01,0,1729301.story</link>			<description>&amp;nbsp;Pending the mayor&apos;s signature, which is expected, all clubs where dancing is permitted will be required to install surveillance cameras at entrances and exits. While some Council members raised privacy concerns, the overwhelming majority agreed the surveillance tapes would be an invaluable deterrent and aid police if a crime is committed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All surveillance tapes must be securely stored, and clubs could be fined up to $50,000 if the footage makes its way onto TV or gossip Web sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Industry representatives welcomed the surveillance camera vote, but pointed out that 90 percent of clubs with dancing already have such cameras installed.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8607</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:50:56 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>National ID Card Rules Unveiled. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8606</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/98123398/0,72843-0.html&quot;&gt;National ID Card Rules Unveiled&lt;/a&gt;. The DHS chief reveals how he&apos;ll turn state driver&apos;s licenses into internal passports. By Ryan Singel. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8606</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:48:35 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>DOD, Microsoft sign deal to data mine health records</title>			<link>http://govhealthit.com/article97802-03-01-07-Web</link>			<description>The Defense Department has signed an agreement with Microsoft underwhich the software vendor will help develop tools and methods foranalyzing the department&apos;s 9.1 million electronic patient records tofind better ways to manage the health of DOD beneficiaries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Underthe cooperative research and development agreement, Microsoft will workwith the Army&apos;s Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center toextract, store and analyze data stored in DOD&apos;s Armed Forces HealthLongitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) electronic health recordsystem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The AHLTA clinical data repository (CDR) is &quot;an untappedgoldmine of health information, and the ability to draw upon andefficiently use this data will allow us to unleash the true power ofAHLTA,&quot; said Dr. William Winkenwerder Jr., assistant secretary ofDefense for health affairs. &quot;This project has the potential to vastlyimprove our ability to provide both force health protection andpopulation health improvement activities for every soldier, sailor,airman and Marine.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft and the Army center aim to developa clinical data warehouse (CDW) that provides predefined queries ofinterest to clinicians and analysts. The warehouse also will supportdata mining, which uses clustering and pattern recognition techniquesto discover previously unknown correlations in the data. Intel and HPare providing support on security, sizing, and scalability testing ofthe CDW architecture, Microsoft said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Deborah Peel,chairwoman of the Patient Privacy Rights Foundation, views the patientinformation not as a goldmine ripe for exploitation but as a collectionof personal and sensitive health information that needs to be zealouslyguarded and only accessed with express consent by the patient.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8605</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:46:58 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>War of Words Erupts Between HP Scandal Players. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8598</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/97688138/article.html&quot;&gt;War of Words Erupts Between HP Scandal Players&lt;/a&gt;. The attorney for the ousted HP chairman fired back  at public comments made by board rival about the HP pretexting scandal. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/03/01.html#a8598</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:20:30 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>New Profiling Program Raises Privacy Concerns - washingtonpost.com</title>			<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/27/AR2007022701542.html</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;The Department of Homeland Security is testing a data-mining programthat would attempt to spot terrorists by combing vast amounts ofinformation about average Americans, such as flight and hotelreservations. Similar to a Pentagon program killed by Congress in 2003over concerns about civil liberties, the new program could take effectas soon as next year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But researchers testing the system arelikely to already have violated privacy laws by reviewing realinformation, instead of fake data, according to a source familiar witha congressional investigation into the $42.5 million program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bearing the unwieldy name Analysis, Dissemination, Visualization,Insight and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE), the program is on thecutting edge of analytical technology that applies mathematicalalgorithms to uncover hidden relationships in data. The idea is totroll a vast sea of information, including audio and visual, andextract suspicious people, places and other elements based on theirlinks and behavioral patterns.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The privacy violation, describedin a Government Accountability Office report that is due out soon, wasone of three by separate government data mining programs, according tothe GAO. &quot;Undoubtedly there are likely to be more,&quot; GAO ComptrollerDavid M. Walker said in a recent congressional hearing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Theviolations involved the government&apos;s use of citizens&apos; privateinformation without proper notification to the public and using thedata for a purpose different than originally envisioned, said thesource, who declined to be identified because the report is not yetpublic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue lies at the heart of the debate over whetherpattern-based data mining -- or searching for bad guys without a knownsuspect -- can succeed without invading people&apos;s privacy and violatingtheir civil liberties.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8592</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:36:54 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Canada Rejects Anti-Terror Laws.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8590</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/97467149/article.pl&quot;&gt;Canada Rejects Anti-Terror Laws&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;			&lt;a href=&quot;http://jedidiah.stuff.gen.nz/wp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Coryoth&lt;/a&gt; writes&amp;nbsp; &quot;The Canadian parliament has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6403241.stm&quot;&gt;voted against renewing anti-terror laws&lt;/a&gt;that had been introduced after September 11, 2001. The rejected lawsincluded provisions to hold terror suspects indefinitely, and to compelwitnesses to testify, and were in some sense Canada&apos;s version fo thePatriot Act. The laws were voted down in the face of claims from theminority Conservative government that the Liberal Party was soft onterror, and despite the fact that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/06/03/canada.terror/index.html&quot;&gt;Canada has faced active terrorist cells&lt;/a&gt;in their own country. The anti-terror laws have never been used, and itwas viewed that they are neither relevant, nor needed, in dealing withterrorist plots. Hopefully more countries will come to the sameconclusion.&quot;&amp;nbsp; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8590</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:28:09 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Microsoft Tackles &apos;False Positives&apos; in Antipiracy Tool. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8588</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.pcworld.com/%7Er/pcworld/latestnews/%7E3/97457770/article.html&quot;&gt;Microsoft Tackles &apos;False Positives&apos; in Antipiracy Tool&lt;/a&gt;. Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications is revised to cut customers some slack after erroneous reports. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com&quot;&gt;PC World: Latest Technology News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8588</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:12:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://feeds.pcworld.com/pcworld/latestnews">PC World: Latest Technology News</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>NY1: Nightclub Safety On Council Agenda</title>			<link>http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&amp;aid=67213</link>			<description>Clubs will also now be required to have security cameras at theirentrances and exits. Outside monitors could also be installed at clubsin frequent trouble with the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The New York Civil Liberties Union have said some of the proposalsviolate privacy, but the bill&apos;s sponsors have said they are just tryingto keep club patrons safe.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8585</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:06:21 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is Bugged. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8582</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000202.html&quot;&gt;How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is Bugged&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Blog Update (February 27, 2007):&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;New!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;A short free video&lt;/b&gt; demonstrating this topic:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/cellbug-vid-youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Play Via &lt;i&gt;YouTube&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/cellbug-vid-google&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Play Via &lt;i&gt;Google Video&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. More information at &lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000213.html&quot;&gt;this blog entry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr width=&quot;50%&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings.  A story is making the rounds right now regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1029-6140191.html&quot;&gt;FBI use of cell phones as remote bugs&lt;/a&gt;.  I originally wrote about this concept in my PRIVACY Forum in 1999 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vortex.com/privacy/priv.08.11&quot;&gt;&quot;Cell Phones Become Instant Bugs!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;) so the issue is real, but we still need to bring the current saga back down to earth.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This discussion doesn&apos;t only relate to &quot;legal&quot; bugs but also to theuse of such techniques by illegal clandestine operations, and appliesto physically unmodified cell phone hardware (not phones that mighthave had separate, specialized bugs physically installed within them bythird parties).&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://lauren.vortex.com/&quot;&gt;Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8582</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:56:25 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://lauren.vortex.com/index.rdf">Lauren Weinstein&apos;s Blog</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF - miniLinks for 2007-02-28.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8581</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005142.php&quot;&gt;miniLinks for 2007-02-28&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;ul style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=597&quot;&gt;Supreme Court Debates Patentability of Software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Justices look skeptically at the details of software&apos;s protection.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ethipat.org/&quot;&gt;Toward an Ethical Patent System&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;European citizens unite against over-broad patents....&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esoma.org/&quot;&gt;Bad Patents Are Bad for Business&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;... as does the European business community to go with it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/23/NEVIUS.TMP&quot;&gt;Canada Turns Away Americans for Past Misdemeanors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Thanks to DHS data mining, Canada turned away a visitor who shop-lifted during a fraternity prank 20 years ago and others with minor criminal records.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2007/02/25/#002355&quot;&gt;Has the Media Center Moved to Silicon Valley?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;On the day of the Oscars, Tom Forenski thinks that films have lost their magic, and Net technology has seized it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.csoonline.com/blog_view.html?CID=29005&quot;&gt;Whit Diffie Warns Of Overbroad Privacy Laws&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;I am, on balance, more pleased with the fact that I can learn lots of information about people in minutes by using the Web than I am concerned about the fact that people can learn lots of information about me that way. And I would not like to see laws that restrict people&apos;s ability to go investigate things. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=596&quot;&gt;Protect Your Users&apos; Data With a Privacy Wall&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;How one company works to protect its users&apos; financial information.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/02/23/EDGRJN77SG1.DTL&quot;&gt;SF Chronicle: Reverse Real ID&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Congress must take a hard look at whether it makes sense to proceed with an expansive law that would be more appropriately called the National ID Act.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8640881&quot;&gt;North Korea and the Internet &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;North Korea&apos;s strange, inward-looking national intranet.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/3971717a4560.html&quot;&gt;Did WIPO&apos;s Director-General Lie About his age?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Confidential report suggests that he was 28 when he first took the job, not 37, and has repeatedly given the wrong age on official documents for 24 years.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8013&quot;&gt;The &quot;Crime&quot; of Blogging in Egypt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Abdelkareem Nabil Soliman is sentenced to four years for free speech.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=598&quot;&gt;Recording Industry Targets Colleges&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Administrators get caught in the crossfire: &quot;[The complaint] is asking us to pursue an investigation and as the service provider we don&apos;t see that as our role&quot;, says Purdue spokesman.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/28.html#a8581</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:50:21 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Lawsuits, patent claims silence Black Hat talk | InfoWorld | 2007-02-27 | By Paul F. Roberts</title>			<link>http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/27/HNioactiverfid_1.html</link>			<description>&lt;span class=&quot;artText&quot;&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot; page=&quot;1&quot;&gt;A planned talk onRFID security by a security researcher has been pulled from this week&apos;sBlack Hat Federal security conference after secure card maker HIDclaimed the talk violated the company&apos;s patent rights and threatened totake legal action against Chris Paget, the researcher, and IOActive,Paget&apos;s employer, if the talk went forward. &lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;div class=&quot;embedContainer&quot;&gt;                     			                                             				&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; language=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;getLHCRelSpArt(&apos;/article/07/02/27/HNioactiverfid_1.html&apos;,&apos;leftColumn&apos;);&lt;/script&gt;                  &lt;/div&gt;                  &lt;!--end div embedContainer--&gt;                  &lt;p class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot; page=&quot;1&quot;&gt;Thecompany decided to cancel the talk after all-night negotiations withHID collapsed, said Josh Pennell, CEO of IOActive. In response, BlackHat organizers were forced to tear materials out of printed showproceedings and will instead present a discussion by a representativeof the ACLU on the criticality of RFID security, said Jeff Moss,founder and director of Black Hat. &lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;p class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot; page=&quot;1&quot;&gt;A spokeswoman for HID did not immediately respond to a request for comment.&lt;/p&gt;                  &lt;p class=&quot;ArticleBody&quot; page=&quot;1&quot;&gt;The incident recalled a 2005 &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/techwatch/archives/002373.html&quot; class=&quot;regularArticleU&quot;&gt;dispute over a presentation at Black Hat in Las Vegas&lt;/a&gt; involving Cisco Systems and Michael Lynn, a security researcher who worked for Internet Security Systems at the time.                  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/27.html#a8577</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:59:50 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Administrivia:  Now we have a overheated CPU ( 60 degrees centigrade )</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/27.html#a8574</link>			<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;OK, if the DDOS attack wasn&apos;t enough. Now our server went down with a temperature overload. We were up to 60 degrees centigrade when we shut down. The CPU and a broken fan have been replaced.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/27.html#a8574</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:39:01 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Administrivia: Our data-center was hit by a DDOS attack today.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/27.html#a8573</link>			<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Sorry for being either very slow or off the net for a while recently. The data-center we are part of was hit by a DDOS (Distributed Denial Of Service) attack &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;recently&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;. At the moment it looks to be under control, but we are keeping an eye on things.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/27.html#a8573</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:19:59 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>RFID Chips Shrink to Powder Size. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8566</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.wired.com/%7Er/wired/politics/privacy/%7E3/94511677/JAPAN_POWDER_CHIP&quot;&gt;RFID Chips Shrink to Powder Size&lt;/a&gt;. Hitachi&apos;s new tags measure 0.002 inches square, but store as much information as their much-larger predecessors. The company&apos;s still investigating possible uses. By the Associated Press. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News: Security Blanket&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8566</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:15:53 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news/feeds/rss2/0,2610,50,00.xml">Wired News: Security Blanket</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Critics: New airport X-ray is a virtual strip search | CNET News.com</title>			<link>http://news.com.com/Critics+New+airport+X-ray+is+a+virtual+strip+search/2100-1008_3-6161954.html?tag=newsmap</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt; U.S. authorities in Phoenix on Friday began testing a controversialnew X-ray machine to screen air passengers for weapons, a process thatcritics likened to a &quot;virtual strip search.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Feds+Homeland+Security+project+didnt+protect+privacy/2100-1029_3-6145796.html&quot; title=&quot;Feds: Homeland Security project didn&apos;t protect privacy -- Friday, Dec 22, 2006&quot;&gt;U.S. Transportation Security Administration&lt;/a&gt; rolled out an X-ray machine that uses so-called &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Post-911+antiterror+technology+A+report+card/2100-1028_3-6113064.html&quot; title=&quot;Post-9/11 antiterror technology: A report card -- Thursday, Sep 7, 2006&quot;&gt;backscatter&quot; technology&lt;/a&gt;at one checkpoint at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. Themachine peers beneath passengers&apos; clothes to search for hiddenexplosives and weapons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The TSA will test the machine in Phoenix for 60 to 90 daysbefore deploying machines in Los Angeles and New York&apos;s John F. KennedyAirport for additional testing this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Everyday the bad guys are working and improving their tools.We need to continue working to improve ours, and introducing thistechnology is part of that work,&quot; TSA regional spokesman Nico Melendeztold Reuters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Privacy groups and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/State+officials+oppose+repealing+Real+ID+Act/2100-1028_3-6157813.html&quot; title=&quot;State officials oppose repealing Real ID Act -- Thursday, Feb 8, 2007&quot;&gt;American Civil Liberties Union&lt;/a&gt; have labeled the new screening a &quot;virtual strip search&quot; that could be abused.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But TSA officials said Friday they had worked with industryspecialists to blur any images of body parts generated by the scan, andlikened the resulting picture to a &quot;chalk outline&quot; of a person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8563</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:05:45 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Privacy Concerns a Major Roadblock for Location-based Services Says Survey. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8559</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/story_rss.php?id=104064&amp;amp;ti=Privacy+Concerns+a+Major+Roadblock+for+Location-based+Services+Says+Survey&quot;&gt;Privacy Concerns a Major Roadblock for Location-based Services Says Survey&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Providers must give users control over location-based features to allay privacy concerns.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3&quot;&gt;GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8559</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:40:51 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.govtech.net/rss/channels.php?channel=3">GT: &lt;!--GT home: --&gt;Security and Privacy</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Surveillance Cameras Get Smarter - International Business Times</title>			<link>http://ibtimes.com/articles/20070226/surveillance-cameras.htm</link>			<description>Look around - You might not be the only one watching. Thenever-blinking surveillance cameras, rapidly becoming a part of dailylife in public and even private places, may be sizing you up as well.And they may soon get a lot smarter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Researchers and security companies are developing cameras that notonly watch the world but also interpret what they see. Soon, somecameras may be able to find unattended bags at airports, guess yourheight or analyze the way you walk to see if you are hiding something.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of the cameras widely used today are used as forensic tools toidentify crooks after-the-fact. (Think grainy video on local TV news ofconvenience store robberies gone wrong.) But the latest breed, known as&quot;intelligent video,&quot; could transform cameras from passive observers toeyes with brains, able to detect suspicious behavior and potentiallyprevent crime before it occurs.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8557</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:16:37 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Surveillance Cameras Get Smarter.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8556</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/96441085/article.pl&quot;&gt;Surveillance Cameras Get Smarter&lt;/a&gt;. kog777 writes to mention that the IB Times is taking a look at where surveillance camera technology is headed. Soon researchers tell us that cameras will be available that not only record, but are able to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ibtimes.com/articles/20070226/surveillance-cameras.htm&quot;&gt;interpret what they see.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The advancements have already been put to work. For example, cameras in Chicago and Washington can detect gunshots and alert police. Baltimore installed cameras that can play a recorded message and snap pictures of graffiti sprayers or illegal dumpers. In the commercial market, the gaming industry uses camera systems that can detect facial features, according to Bordes. Casinos use their vast banks of security cameras to hunt cheating gamblers who have been flagged before.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8556</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:12:54 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Tor Open To Attack. </title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8553</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline/%7E3/95886586/article.pl&quot;&gt;Tor Open To Attack&lt;/a&gt;. An anonymous reader writes &quot;A group of researchers have written a paper that lays out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.colorado.edu/department/publications/reports/docs/CU-CS-1025-07.pdf&quot;&gt;an attack against Tor&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) in enough detail to cause Roger Dingledine a fair amount of heartburn. The essential avenue of attack is that Tor doesn&apos;t verify claims of uptime or bandwidth, allowing an attacker to advertise more than it need deliver, and thus draw traffic. If the attacker controls the entry and exit node and has decent clocks, then the attacker can link these together and trace someone through the network.&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;Slashdot: Your Rights Online&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/26.html#a8553</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:00:19 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline">Slashdot: Your Rights Online</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Wired News: Why Smart Cops Do Dumb Things By Bruce Schneier</title>			<link>http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,72774-0.html?tw=rss.index</link>			<description>Since 9/11, we&apos;ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars defendingourselves from terrorist attacks. Stories about the ineffectiveness ofmany of these security measures are common, but less so are discussionsof &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; they are so ineffective. In short: Much of ourcountry&apos;s counterterrorism security spending is not designed to protectus from the terrorists, but instead to protect our public officialsfrom criticism when another attack occurs.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/24.html#a8542</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:58:46 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>NYC Gothamist: How the NYPD Videotapes You</title>			<link>http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2007/02/21/how_the_nypd_vi.php</link>			<description>&lt;p&gt;In the wake of a federal judge &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2007/02/16/judge_slams_nyp.php&quot;&gt;criticizing the NYPD&apos;s videotaping procedures&lt;/a&gt; last week, I-Witness Video &lt;a href=&quot;http://iwitnessvideo.info/blog/15.html&quot;&gt;looks at what the NYPD actually uses to record public events&lt;/a&gt;and calls it &quot;360 degrees of surveillance,&quot; best illustrated by whatthe police used during the 2004 Republican National Convention. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Officers used &quot;lipstick cameras&quot; which are easily concealed, as wellas helicopters with &quot;military-style infrared imaging.&quot; And Fuji lentthe NYPD its BlimpCam, and I-Witness Video describes the blimpcamfootage from August 27, 2004:&lt;/p&gt;</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/24.html#a8530</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:16:23 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>EFF - miniLinks for 2007-02-21.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/23.html#a8525</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005131.php&quot;&gt;miniLinks for 2007-02-21&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;ul style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theopenhouseproject.com/&quot;&gt;Free Congress!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Coders gather to open up more of the legislature&apos;s deliberations.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/02/post_2.php&quot;&gt;Republicans, Democrats Spat Over IP Rights in Congress TV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;After Speaker of the House Nancy Polosi is accused of &quot;pirating&quot; C-SPAN, the TV service reiterates that it has no copyright interest in the video.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=591&quot;&gt;Chinese Lawyers Protest Sina&apos;s Blog Censorship&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fight the arbitrary nature of China&apos;s limits on free speech.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/magazine/18djdrama.t.html?ref=slashdot&quot;&gt;New York Times on the DJ Mixtape Arrests&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;DJs continued to release tapes -- some with hastily added tracks on which rappers cursed the RIAA&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdirt.com/articles/20070219/015211.shtml&quot;&gt;Disney Must Consider Sharing Pooh&apos;s Honey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The endless fight over the merchandising rights to A.A. Milne&apos;s work continues to plague the copyright maximalist company.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=592&quot;&gt;Students Balk at University&apos;s &quot;Free&quot; Music Deals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;One insider&apos;s view of dealing with the college-only licensed music services.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=593&quot;&gt;Bipartisan Effort to Junk Real ID Law&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Democrat Rep. Tom Allen and Republican Rep. Scott Lansley push for reform of costly, invasive national ID mandate.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cepro.com/news/editorial/17746.html&quot;&gt;A 55-inch TV Is too big for the Super Bowl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Consumer electronics mavens scratch their heads at NFL&apos;s Super Bowl rules.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39285993,00.htm?r=1&quot;&gt;UK Government Rejects Calls for DRM Ban&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;While faulty, DRM is good for price discrimination, Prime Minister&apos;s office says.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxworld.com/community/?q=node/372&quot;&gt;Framing the DRM Debate &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;LinuxJournal&apos;s Don Marti says it&apos;s about more than property.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=594&quot;&gt;Europe&apos;s Plan to Track Phone and Net Use&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Data retention implementation to be far worse than original plans.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;ml-even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=595&quot;&gt;UK Now Running 439,000 E-mail and Phone Taps&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Report&apos;s author declares wiretap error rate &quot;unacceptably high.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/23.html#a8525</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:14:58 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Colleges Struggle to Cope With Flood of Copyright Complaints.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/23.html#a8516</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005133.php&quot;&gt;Colleges Struggle to Cope With Flood of Copyright Complaints&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;The major record labels &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070221/ap_on_hi_te/downloading_music;_ylt=Atl91m6mSsirc51m6M3hfaIjtBAF&quot;&gt;are &lt;/a&gt; sending thousands more copyright nastygrams to colleges regarding student file sharing this year. Of course, file sharing continues unabated, and these P2P-related notices will simply push fans to use other readily-accessible technologies that the RIAA can&apos;t easily monitor -- copying music through iTunes over the campus LAN, swapping hard drives and USB flash drives, burning recordable DVDs, and forming ad hoc wireless networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the RIAA&apos;s strategy still won&apos;t stop file sharing, but it certainly will cause collateral damage to academic freedom, free speech, and privacy. In a recently released report, the Brennan Center &lt;a href=&quot;http://fairusenetwork.org/resources/OSPreport-2007.pdf&quot;&gt;lays out&lt;/a&gt; what that cost looks like today based on interviews with representatives from 25 service providers including 10 from universities. Universities are already being forced to waste substantial resources on doing the RIAA&apos;s dirty work. Flooded with machine-generated complaints, schools are unable to evaluate the merits of particular complaints. While lacking procedural safeguards to make sure students wrongly accused of infringement are not penalized, many schools have adopted stricter penalties than the law requires. Schools have also adopted network monitoring and filtering tools that interfere with legitimate expression. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The increase in P2P-related notices stands only to make matters worse. The RIAA&apos;s Cary Sherman states that the increase in the notices is &quot;something we feel we have to do,&quot; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005132.php&quot;&gt;blanket licensing provides a clear alternative to blanket lawsuits.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/share/petition&quot;&gt;Take action now to help stop the lawsuit campaign.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/23.html#a8516</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:49:38 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>AT&amp;T Whistleblower Wins Award.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/22.html#a8513</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005129.php&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Whistleblower Wins Award&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Whistleblower Mark Klein will get some well-deserved acknowledgement when he receives a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spj.org/norcal/&quot;&gt;James Madison Freedom of Information Award&lt;/a&gt; next month. The award could hardly find a more deserving recipient [~] Klein is the former AT&amp;amp;T technician who exposed the extent of the government&apos;s warrantless wiretapping program&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In early 2006, Klein came forward with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70944-0.html&quot;&gt;internal AT&amp;amp;T documents&lt;/a&gt; that show the company cooperated with the NSA&apos;s secret program to eavesdrop on internet communications, in violation of federal wiretapping laws and the Fourth Amendment. Klein&apos;s evidence demonstrates that in at least one of AT&amp;amp;T&apos;s facilities, internet traffic was diverted to a secret, secure room to which only the NSA had access. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of the documents have been used in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&quot;&gt;EFF&apos;s court case&lt;/a&gt;, which is currently under review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and a portion have been made broadly available on the internet since April, 2006.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the words of EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl, Klein is [base &quot;]a true American hero.[per thou] This public recognition of his bravery in defense of the public&apos;s right to know is richly deserved.&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/&quot;&gt;EFF: Deep Links&lt;/a&gt;]</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/22.html#a8513</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:28:40 GMT</pubDate>			<source url="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/index.xml">EFF: Deep Links</source>			</item>		<item>			<title>Music moguls seek security blanket - Los Angeles Times</title>			<link>http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-healey19feb19,0,5551102.story?coll=la-opinion-center</link>			<description>One way to judge the music industry&apos;s troubles is to watch annual sales figures for CDs, which have slumped 25% since 2000. But it&apos;s morerevealing to chart how the major record companies&apos; attitudes about new business models online have been shifting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At first the shifts were almost too small to notice, as when thelabels started making &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2000/lose.html&quot;&gt;a handful of downloadable songs available&lt;/a&gt; for $2.50 ormore. But as the file-sharing phenomenon grew and CD sales slipped, the changesbecame more pronounced. The labels started offering the rights to songs onterms that didn&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1017-255642.html&quot;&gt;cripple their online partners&lt;/a&gt;. They embraced Apple&apos;s iTunesMusic Store, whose anti-piracy technology &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macrumors.com/2003/04/29/itunes-music-store-digital-rights-summary/&quot;&gt;doesn&apos;t actually limit copying&lt;/a&gt;. Theycut &lt;a href=&quot;http://freedomtodiffer.typepad.com/freedom_to_differ/2006/07/kazaa_settlemen.html&quot;&gt;deals&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imesh.com/&quot;&gt;file-sharing&lt;/a&gt; companies for subscription services that let usersshare the songs they rented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Along the way, though, the major labels adamantly refused to dothe kind of deal necessary to replicate what the original Napster,Kazaa andeDonkey had provided: they would not accept a flat fee a &quot;blanket&quot;license that lets Internet service providers sell an all-you-can-eatsonic buffet, enabling customers to download, burn and swap as much asthey pleased.The rights would be included in the cost of a high-speed Internetaccess line,so the downloads would seem free while still generating royalties forartists,songwriters, labels and publishers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That reticence may be giving way, too, thanks to therelentless decline in revenue. Just look at what the head of themajor record companies&apos; global trade group, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/24/business/ptend25.php&quot;&gt;let slip&lt;/a&gt; last month at amusic-industry gathering in France. If Internet service providers &quot;want to cometo us and look for a blanket license for an amount per month,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ifpi.org/&quot;&gt;IFPI&lt;/a&gt; chief John Kennedy said, &quot;let&apos;sengage in that discussion.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His U.S. counterpart, Mitch Bainwol of the Recording IndustryAssn. of America (RIAA), quickly added that the licenses should be negotiatedvoluntarily, not compelled by the government. So that part of the labels&apos;thinking hasn&apos;t changed. Nevertheless, Kennedy&apos;s remark reflects a potentialsea change in the way the record companies do business. If the labels followthrough, it could trigger the greatest explosion in innovation since engineersat the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany &lt;a href=&quot;http://mp3licensing.com/mp3/history.html&quot;&gt;developed the MP3format&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;That&apos;s a big &quot;if,&quot; but two of the four majors have already takenthe first step. In England, a venture called &lt;a href=&quot;http://playloudermsp.com/thedifference.html&quot;&gt;PlayLouder MSP&lt;/a&gt; is negotiatingdeals with record companies and music publishers for a competitively pricedhigh-speed Internet access service that will include the right to downloadmillions of songs, transfer them to portable devices and share them withfriends. The main restriction is that subscribers can&apos;t send songs to peoplewho aren&apos;t customers of PlayLouder MSP. In other words, it&apos;s a privateelectronic playground for music lovers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The company, which expects to launch its service this year, &lt;a href=&quot;http://playloudermsp.com/faq.html&quot;&gt;plans&lt;/a&gt; to put a chunk of the monthly service chargesinto a royalty pool that would be divided according to popularity--the moreoften a song is downloaded, the larger the share of the pool that its copyrightholders will receive. To monitor the network and enforce its borders,PlayLouder MSP relies on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ci-info.com/&quot;&gt;technology&lt;/a&gt; that can identify songs as they passthrough the network--and, if necessary, block them. So far, &lt;a href=&quot;http://playloudermsp.com/industrypartners.html&quot;&gt;several largeindependent labels&lt;/a&gt; from the U.S. and the U.K. have agreed to let the companyoffer MP3s of all their songs, while two of the majors, &lt;a href=&quot;http://playloudermsp.com/pressrelease_22aug05.html&quot;&gt;Sony BMG&lt;/a&gt; and EMI, haveagreed to supply songs wrapped in electronic locks. Those locks won&apos;t make muchdifference, though; as part of the deal, subscribers will be free to share MP3sfrom all of PlayLouder MSP&apos;s partners, including Sony BMG and EMI.</description>			<guid>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/22.html#a8512</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:24:50 GMT</pubDate>			</item>		<item>			<title>Judge Refuses to Release Critical Documents in AT&amp;T Surveillance Case.</title>			<link>Http://www.PrivacyDigest.com/topic/surveillance/2007/02/22.html#a8505</link>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_02.php#005127&quot;&gt;Judge Refuses to Release Critical Documents in AT&amp;amp;T Surveillance Case&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;Klein Declaration and Other Internal Documents to Stay Sealed for Now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;San Francisco - A federal judge in San Francisco today denied requests from media groups to unseal critical evidence in the Electronic Frontier Foundation&apos;s (EFF&apos;s) class-action lawsuit against AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EFF&apos;s suit accuses the telecom giant of collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in illegal spying on millions of ordinary Americans. The sealed evidence includes a declaration by Mark Klein, a retired AT&amp;amp;T telecommunications technician, as well as several internal AT&amp;amp;T documents and portions of a declaration from EFF&apos;s expert witness. Some of the evidence was previously released in redacted form, while other evidence is still completely unavailable to the media and the public.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&apos;re disappointed that the court did not choose to unseal all of the documents that include or refer to the evidence presented by Mark Klein and our expert, J. Scott Marcus. The government has already agreed that the evidence is neither classified nor a state secret, and is only being held under seal because of AT&amp;amp;T&apos;s weak trade secrecy claims,&quot; said Cindy Cohn, EFF&apos;s Legal Director. &quot;Given that the privacy of millions of Americans is at stake, we strongly believe that the public would benefit from seeing this evidence for themselves.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today&apos;s order is in response to a December hearing on the sealing issue. U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker granted the media groups&apos; request to intervene in the case, and said that he might revisit the unsealing motion at a later date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For Judge Walker&apos;s full order:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/order_media_unsealing.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/order_media_unsealing.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/order_media_unsealing.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on EFF&apos;s case against AT&amp;amp;T:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Contacts:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cindy Cohn&lt;br&gt;   Legal Director&lt;br&gt;   Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:cindy@eff.org&quot;&gt;cindy@eff.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Jeschke&lt;br&gt;   Media Coordinator&lt;br&gt;   Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;br&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:press@eff.org&quot;&gt;press@eff.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; [&lt;a href=&